Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    23Yankee
    Newest Member
    23Yankee
    Joined

Weak-Moderate El Nino 2018-2019


Recommended Posts

The subsurface readings for 100W-180W, for the top 300m came in warmer than September, as expected - and in line with the animations of the warm waters moving east.

http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ocean/index/heat_content_index.txt

Equtorial Upper 300m temperature Average anomaly based on 1981-2010 Climatology (deg C)
YR    MON   130E-80W   160E-80W   180W-100W 
2018    8     0.75      0.73       0.81
2018    9     1.03      1.06       1.12
2018   10     1.20      1.38       1.59

The closest blend in the 100W-180W zone for Aug to Oct is 1991 (x2), 2002 (x3). That blend actually looks pretty close to what I think will happen in November.

Subsurface August Sept October
2002 1.05 1.41 1.72
2002 1.05 1.41 1.72
2002 1.05 1.41 1.72
1991 0.49 0.6 1.41
1991 0.49 0.6 1.41
Mean 0.83 1.09 1.60
2018 0.81 1.12

1.59

The anti-logs for Aug-Oct show a near opposite pattern too, which is good indication that the blend is probably about right for November, even with 1991, the Pinatubo year in there. The blend of 1991 and 2002 is fairly similar to my outlook for temps too, except the NE/SE are flipped.

kYYXul4.png

DqjXa52WwAMj4HM.jpg

That +1.59 subsurface means this could (but probably won't?) end up as a pretty powerful El Nino, all things being equal. Based on the historical relationship between the Oct subsurface and DJF anomalies v. 1951-2010, there is an 80% chance of the DJF value coming between +0.9C and +2.1C, with an expected value of +1.5C. Against the warmer more recent 30-year means, you knock off 0.1, so +0.8 to +2.0. The only Octobers ahead in the 1979-2017 data are 1982, 1997, 2002 and 2015.

These are the most negative Aug-Oct subsurface years for Nov -

xXfiW82.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The subsurface warmth has definitely been warming regions 3.4 and 3 pretty rapidly, but as I have been saying....still not breaching region 1.2.
Modoki all the way.

                               1.2                   3                          3.4                       4

03OCT2018     21.3 0.7     25.6 0.7     27.4 0.7     29.5 0.8
 10OCT2018     21.1 0.4     25.6 0.7     27.3 0.6     29.5 0.9
 17OCT2018     21.1 0.3     25.9 1.0     27.6 0.9     29.6 0.9
 24OCT2018     21.3 0.3     25.9 1.0     27.7 1.1     29.8 1.1
21OCT2009     21.2 0.3     25.8 0.8     27.7 1.0     29.8 1.2

 

25OCT2006     22.7 1.6     26.1 1.1     27.6 0.9     29.6 1.0

 

26OCT1994     21.7 0.7     25.6 0.6     27.6 1.0     29.5 0.9

Much closer to 2009 over 2006.

 

Like I said before when folks were sweating the 1.2 warming...its unstable, and cooled right back off....poof.

However the warm punch is good news for the mid atl because we are now likely to make moderate....I'd say 1.1-1.2C tri monthly.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nino 3.4 is up to +1.4C according to Griteater. Probably not as low of a chance as you think of hitting +1.5 now in that zone. Doesn't seem to be weakening. I've been trying to point out for two months now that the models showing a long-lasting or double El Nino may not be crazy. Those events tend to peak late. This event still has at least another few weeks to grow in strength. The westward extension of the subsurface heat is draining to the East, the longer it does that, the less and less it will become like 2002, 2004, 2009, 2014. The next set of +3C waters seem closest to surfacing pretty far East. That should warm up Nino 3 and Nino 1.2 pretty fast. For what its worth, Nino 1.2 had been negative, almost uninterrupted, from essentially August 2016 to Sept 2017, so snapping that in one month is kind of impressive. When I say hybrid, I mean the warmth, by anomalies looks like it could centered in Nino 3, not 1.2 or 3.4/4.

Equatorial Pacific Temperature Depth Anomalies Animation

I think my analogs for October, at least in the ENSO zone did pretty well for the structure of the El Nino. The core of the event is around 120W so far, Modokis are around 160-180W typically. East based to me means 90W centered, or east.

MZ7Y1bg.png

4MDQji7.png

This El Nino formed west to east at the surface which is unusual because Nino 1.2 was severely cold last winter. The box to the right of the right black line has warmed and it is filling in right of the right yellow line. The warmth is clearly getting into Nino 1.2, it just isn't quite there yet. If anything, Nino 4 seems like it could cool fairly soon.

I've also tried to point this out, the monthly Nino 1.2 tends to run warmer than the weeklies in October for whatever reason, it may end up near 21.3-21.5C officially.

zoappjv.png

I'll look at the objective best matches for the four Nino zones in October when the data comes in. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

October 2009 saw the same spike in 1.2.

07OCT2009     20.1-0.5     25.5 0.6     27.3 0.6     29.4 0.7
 14OCT2009     21.0 0.2     25.6 0.7     27.5 0.8     29.6 1.0
 21OCT2009     21.2 0.3     25.8 0.8     27.7 1.0     29.8 1.2
 28OCT2009     21.6 0.5     26.1 1.2     28.1 1.4     30.0 1.3

I don't think its that important....the event is maturing.

Not a big deal, but like I said, it will probably make moderate now....which is the big take away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, raindancewx said:

Nino 3.4 is up to +1.4C according to Griteater. Probably not as low of a chance as you think of hitting +1.5 now in that zone. Doesn't seem to be weakening. I've been trying to point out for two months now that the models showing a long-lasting or double El Nino may not be crazy. Those events tend to peak late. This event still has at least another few weeks to grow in strength. The westward extension of the subsurface heat is draining to the East, the longer it does that, the less and less it will become like 2002, 2004, 2009, 2014. The next set of +3C waters seem closest to surfacing pretty far East. That should warm up Nino 3 and Nino 1.2 pretty fast. For what its worth, Nino 1.2 had been negative, almost uninterrupted, from essentially August 2016 to Sept 2017, so snapping that in one month is kind of impressive. When I say hybrid, I mean the warmth, by anomalies looks like it could centered in Nino 3, not 1.2 or 3.4/4.

Equatorial Pacific Temperature Depth Anomalies Animation

I think my analogs for October, at least in the ENSO zone did pretty well for the structure of the El Nino. The core of the event is around 120W so far, Modokis are around 160-180W typically. East based to me means 90W centered, or east.

MZ7Y1bg.png

4MDQji7.png

This El Nino formed west to east at the surface which is unusual because Nino 1.2 was severely cold last winter. The box to the right of the right black line has warmed and it is filling in right of the right yellow line. The warmth is clearly getting into Nino 1.2, it just isn't quite there yet. If anything, Nino 4 seems like it could cool fairly soon.

I've also tried to point this out, the monthly Nino 1.2 tends to run warmer than the weeklies in October for whatever reason, it may end up near 21.3-21.5C officially.

zoappjv.png

I'll look at the objective best matches for the four Nino zones in October when the data comes in. 

So if it becomes less like those years...then what years would it resemble instead? (Of course I'm asking since those other years were great for my region, lol)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The warmest sub surface anomalies are progressing east of region 3.4 now, so its not an unlimited ceiling. Most of the greatest anomalies are shifting into region 3. And not all of it will reach the surface necessarily.

This is the el nino event's push toward maturity.

2009 featured a peak weekly anomaly of .7C in region 1.2, so I don't know where this notion that all of the warm anomalies are supposed to remain west came from. They progressed eastward as it matured even in the king of all modoki events.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2009 started east and went west. That is my problem with it. 2009 and 2018 are like ships passing in opposite directions at the same point, for a brief moment. These are like night and dry trends honestly. Maybe it doesn't matter? But my hunch is it does. 2010 looked most like a classic Modoki late. This event looked most like Modoki...now? There aren't many events that do the West to East thing, where the West warms first in an El Nino.

XXtzm2Y.pngA2XwWzT.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, raindancewx said:

2009 started east and went west. That is my problem with it. 2009 and 2018 are like ships passing in opposite directions at the same point, for a brief moment. These are like night and dry trends honestly. Maybe it doesn't matter? But my hunch is it does. 2010 looked most like a classic Modoki late. This event looked most like Modoki...now? There aren't many events that do the West to East thing, where the West warms first in an El Nino.

XXtzm2Y.pngA2XwWzT.png

In what way do you think it'll matter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, raindancewx said:

2009 started east and went west. That is my problem with it. 2009 and 2018 are like ships passing in opposite directions at the same point, for a brief moment. These are like night and dry trends honestly. Maybe it doesn't matter? But my hunch is it does. 2010 looked most like a classic Modoki late. This event looked most like Modoki...now? There aren't many events that do the West to East thing, where the West warms first in an El Nino.

XXtzm2Y.png

A2XwWzT.png

It still trended back east as it matured.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OSUmetstud said:

The JAS ONI was 0.1. I can't seem to find a single event that started so late which peaked in moderate. Every single one had a JAS of 0.5 or higher. 

 

 

This is why the thought of 1.5 ONI peak is absurd imo.....1.2C is the highest conceivable bounds imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@OSUmetstud

Part of the issue here is NOAA now bases ONI on 30-year periods that change every five years. Against a constant 1951-2010 mean for JAS (26.74C), the ONI was actually +0.39C in July-Sept. NOAA uses 26.99C for that period now. http://origin.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ensostuff/detrend.nino34.ascii.txt

Similar years by using a constant base for anomalies for July, Aug, Sept

1976 27.13 26.98 27.02 0.30
1969 27.08 27.02 27.15 0.34
1968 27.58 27.01 26.72 0.36
1977 27.38 26.85 27.12 0.38
2018 27.42 26.94 27.02 0.39
1953 27.43 26.94 27.01 0.39
1990 27.38 27.07 26.94 0.39
1993 27.52 26.99 27.07 0.45
1986 27.18 27.17 27.24 0.46
2003 27.50 27.11 26.99 0.46
2006 27.30 27.16 27.32 0.52

A jump well over +1.2 probably would be unprecedented v. 1951-2010 means, but the data says what it says - +0.9C is historically the low end for what the surface was in October.

DJF 1.20 3.00 3.4 4   1.2 3 3.4 4
1951 24.40 26.00 26.77 28.30   0.19 0.41 0.26 0.20
1953 23.25 25.73 27.00 28.37   -0.96 0.14 0.49 0.27
1957 24.84 26.96 28.16 29.02   0.63 1.37 1.65 0.92
1958 23.88 25.58 26.96 28.34   -0.33 -0.01 0.45 0.24
1963 23.75 26.10 27.36 28.33   -0.46 0.51 0.85 0.23
1965 24.53 26.68 27.73 28.74   0.32 1.09 1.22 0.64
1968 24.23 26.15 27.54 29.23   0.02 0.56 1.03 1.13
1969 24.69 26.12 26.92 28.65   0.48 0.53 0.41 0.55
1972 25.64 27.37 28.33 28.93   1.43 1.78 1.82 0.83
1976 24.57 26.46 27.18 28.19   0.36 0.87 0.67 0.09
1977 24.04 25.89 27.15 28.69   -0.17 0.30 0.64 0.59
1982 27.10 28.48 28.79 28.76   2.89 2.89 2.28 0.66
1986 25.35 26.79 27.76 28.73   1.14 1.20 1.25 0.63
1987 24.62 26.32 27.34 28.97   0.41 0.73 0.83 0.87
1991 25.13 27.06 28.40 29.12   0.92 1.47 1.89 1.02
1994 25.06 26.44 27.64 29.14   0.85 0.85 1.13 1.04
1997 27.97 28.72 28.87 28.95   3.76 3.13 2.36 0.85
2002 24.86 26.50 27.50 29.05   0.65 0.91 0.99 0.95
2004 24.29 26.07 27.22 29.16   0.08 0.48 0.71 1.06
2006 24.99 26.46 27.29 29.03   0.78 0.87 0.78 0.93
2009 24.83 26.85 28.14 29.41   0.62 1.26 1.63 1.31
2014 24.40 26.13 27.18 29.15   0.19 0.54 0.67 1.05
2015 26.26 28.23 29.13 29.62   2.05 2.64 2.62 1.52
60 yr 24.21 25.59 26.51 28.10          

 

Here is 2009 in JAS v. DJF in Nino 3.4 and Nino 1.2 (v. 1951-2010 means)

          3.4       1.2

JAS:  +0.8     +1.0   net: warmer east by 0.2

DJF:  +1.6     +0.6   net: colder east by 1.0

The nature of the event clearly went from east-based to start to Modoki. There is no "slosh back" on the net. This event appears to be doing the exact opposite, since JAS was +0.0 in Nino 1.2, but is warming/about to warm. Nino 3.4 may warm too, its just, on net, the core switched from East to West, and now it is switching from West to East, even if we don't reach basin wide or obviously 1997 status, it is opposite, at least for now.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, OSUmetstud said:

The JAS ONI was 0.1. I can't seem to find a single event that started so late which peaked in moderate. Every single one had a JAS of 0.5 or higher. 

 

 

There have been cases of 3.4 warming by another 1.0C or 1.1C from the JAS value, though.  So if that happens this time, the peak would be flirting with or getting into moderate territory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, raindancewx said:

@OSUmetstud

Part of the issue here is NOAA now bases ONI on 30-year periods that change every five years. Against a constant 1951-2010 mean for JAS (26.74C), the ONI was actually +0.39C in July-Sept. NOAA uses 26.99C for that period now. http://origin.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ensostuff/detrend.nino34.ascii.txt

Similar years by using a constant base for anomalies for July, Aug, Sept

1976 27.13 26.98 27.02 0.30
1969 27.08 27.02 27.15 0.34
1968 27.58 27.01 26.72 0.36
1977 27.38 26.85 27.12 0.38
2018 27.42 26.94 27.02 0.39
1953 27.43 26.94 27.01 0.39
1990 27.38 27.07 26.94 0.39
1993 27.52 26.99 27.07 0.45
1986 27.18 27.17 27.24 0.46
2003 27.50 27.11 26.99 0.46
2006 27.30 27.16 27.32 0.52

A jump well over +1.2 probably would be unprecedented v. 1951-2010 means, but the data says what it says - +0.9C is historically the low end for what the surface was in October.

DJF 1.20 3.00 3.4 4   1.2 3 3.4 4
1951 24.40 26.00 26.77 28.30   0.19 0.41 0.26 0.20
1953 23.25 25.73 27.00 28.37   -0.96 0.14 0.49 0.27
1957 24.84 26.96 28.16 29.02   0.63 1.37 1.65 0.92
1958 23.88 25.58 26.96 28.34   -0.33 -0.01 0.45 0.24
1963 23.75 26.10 27.36 28.33   -0.46 0.51 0.85 0.23
1965 24.53 26.68 27.73 28.74   0.32 1.09 1.22 0.64
1968 24.23 26.15 27.54 29.23   0.02 0.56 1.03 1.13
1969 24.69 26.12 26.92 28.65   0.48 0.53 0.41 0.55
1972 25.64 27.37 28.33 28.93   1.43 1.78 1.82 0.83
1976 24.57 26.46 27.18 28.19   0.36 0.87 0.67 0.09
1977 24.04 25.89 27.15 28.69   -0.17 0.30 0.64 0.59
1982 27.10 28.48 28.79 28.76   2.89 2.89 2.28 0.66
1986 25.35 26.79 27.76 28.73   1.14 1.20 1.25 0.63
1987 24.62 26.32 27.34 28.97   0.41 0.73 0.83 0.87
1991 25.13 27.06 28.40 29.12   0.92 1.47 1.89 1.02
1994 25.06 26.44 27.64 29.14   0.85 0.85 1.13 1.04
1997 27.97 28.72 28.87 28.95   3.76 3.13 2.36 0.85
2002 24.86 26.50 27.50 29.05   0.65 0.91 0.99 0.95
2004 24.29 26.07 27.22 29.16   0.08 0.48 0.71 1.06
2006 24.99 26.46 27.29 29.03   0.78 0.87 0.78 0.93
2009 24.83 26.85 28.14 29.41   0.62 1.26 1.63 1.31
2014 24.40 26.13 27.18 29.15   0.19 0.54 0.67 1.05
2015 26.26 28.23 29.13 29.62   2.05 2.64 2.62 1.52
60 yr 24.21 25.59 26.51 28.10          

 

Here is 2009 in JAS v. DJF in Nino 3.4 and Nino 1.2 (v. 1951-2010 means)

          3.4       1.2

JAS:  +0.8     +1.0   net: warmer east by 0.2

DJF:  +1.6     +0.6   net: colder east by 1.0

The nature of the event clearly went from east-based to start to Modoki. There is no "slosh back" on the net. This event appears to be doing the exact opposite, since JAS was +0.0 in Nino 1.2, but is warming/about to warm. Nino 3.4 may warm too, its just, on net, the core switched from East to West, and now it is switching from West to East, even if we don't reach basin wide or obviously 1997 status, it is opposite, at least for now.

 

El Nino exists as a relative difference to the Global and PAC SST, why shouldn't we adjust for warming oceans? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hoosier said:

There have been cases of 3.4 warming by another 1.0C or 1.1C from the JAS value, though.  So if that happens this time, the peak would be flirting with or getting into moderate territory.

Sure, I'm just saying there's nothing in the data set that's been this low in JAS that jumped into moderate from here. Anything can happen and I'm certainly not a Nino expert. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point is even though this event may get classified against the modern threshold as a weak El Nino, the actual SSTs are pretty similar to some of the events that became moderate historically. Speaking for at least the SW, I find that the actual SSTs in the Nino zones against a constant base are far more predictive for the weather than the changing anomalies NOAA uses. I haven't looked in other areas though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you use actual SSTs in Nino 3.4 and Nino 1.2, and make the assumption of an El Nino for DJF, there are really three options in the historical data from a similar set of observations to JAS in 2018. Nino 3.4 can warm with Nino 1.2 cooling. That is 1958. Nino 3.4 can warm, while Nino 1.2 remains neutral. That is 1968. Or you can have a lot of warming in Nino 3.4, but even more in Nino 1.2. That is 1986, which also happens be the only year with low solar of the three. Given the subsurface heat moving East...I like 1986. It also matches local/national weather much better than the other two. 1968 was hot in the center of the US in October, 1958 was hot where it was coldest in October.

7AIo3bk.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, raindancewx said:

My point is even though this event may get classified against the modern threshold as a weak El Nino, the actual SSTs are pretty similar to some of the events that became moderate historically. Speaking for at least the SW, I find that the actual SSTs in the Nino zones against a constant base are far more predictive for the weather than the changing anomalies NOAA uses. I haven't looked in other areas though.

That doesn't matter. ENSO is anomaly based.

I'm going to side with NOAA on this...call me crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't get the "coldest winter evah" rah-rah stuff for the NE I see for the sunspot stuff. I use solar data in my analogs, but it seems to mostly impact certain things about storm tracks, cloud formation and storm positions, you have to combine it with other things. The -NAO seems to really be a function of the Atlantic and solar activity as a blend, more than one or the other.

If solar matters, we have the opposite of 1957, 1958, 1968, 2002 and 2014 for solar, those are cold/modoki winters.

If the PDO matters, we don't have the major positive PDO readings of 1986, 2002, 2014, etc. The PDO if anything looks to be trending more negative which is a warm signal for the East.

If El Nino formation patterns matter we are opposite of 2009, and many other severe winters that started in Nino 1.2 in July-Sept.

If the QBO matters, the metric should be positive soon.

If ENSO type matters, we have a subsurface trending very warm and more easterly, even if that just takes the event to a basin-wide or hybrid look instead of Nino 1.2 focus.

If the Arctic matters, you have vastly less sea-ice right now than 1976, 1977, 1986, 2002, or even 2009 or 2014.

The Atlantic is also incredibly warm by the East Coast and seems like it would promote warm lows throughout winter, even if it leads to more storminess and precipitation. You can already see the effect with how much warmer the East was than in October 2002.

Boston (+2.5F warmer high), Philly (+1.5F warmer high), Atlanta (+4.3F warmer high), Richmond (+4.7F warmer high), Jacksonville (+1.6 warmer high), all finished warmer than October 2002, presumably due to the Atlantic being warmer on the coast. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/31/2018 at 8:46 PM, raindancewx said:

The Canadian has shifted to a stronger, longer-lasting, and more-east centered El Nino.

9kC6eXm.png

 

 

Couple questions here. Considering there is a lag time with ENSO forcing wouldn't a better SST anomaly be for Nov-Jan? Also, doesn't a particular ENSO state bear different results depending on whether it is leading into the winter/early winter vs. the middle/tail end of winter?

Looking at the above I think I would still consider that a Modoki even though there is a patch of higher anomalies just east of the 3.4 region. Wouldn't surprise me if we crunched the hard numbers on it that is what they would say as well.

*Weatherbell doesn't really have a good break down of the CANSIPS and I would really like to see a month to month evolution of the SST's. Is the site you are using above a paysite? If not could I get the link? Thanks.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nino 3.4 / Modoki Index for the last 5 days (Daily AVHRR Data) - the warm spike continues

11/1: 1.46 / 0.90

10/31: 1.39 / 1.00

10/30: 1.23 / 1.03

10/29: 0.98 / 0.86

10/28: 0.54 / 0.60

 

The recent warm spike is likely due to the West Pac typhoon that kicked off a brief westerly wind burst on its south side (Oct 20-28), which then rolled east with MJO related tropical forcing.  Any westerly wind anomalies in the central Pacific are going to cause Nino 3.4 warming given the structure of the surface and subsurface warmth.  After this MJO passage, we should see at least some level of cooling, all part of the back and forth slosh with ENSO.

N3AOrJK.gif

pBRJqBT.gif 

 

ZlWHkSh.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, griteater said:

Nino 3.4 / Modoki Index for the last 5 days (Daily AVHRR Data) - the warm spike continues

11/1: 1.46 / 0.90

10/31: 1.39 / 1.00

10/30: 1.23 / 1.03

10/29: 0.98 / 0.86

10/28: 0.54 / 0.60

 

The recent warm spike is likely due to the West Pac typhoon that kicked off a brief westerly wind burst on its south side (Oct 20-28), which then rolled east with MJO related tropical forcing.  Any westerly wind anomalies in the central Pacific are going to cause Nino 3.4 warming given the structure of the surface and subsurface warmth.  After this MJO passage, we should see at least some level of cooling, all part of the back and forth slosh with ENSO.

N3AOrJK.gif

pBRJqBT.gif 

 

ZlWHkSh.png

Great post..thank you. I never would have made the connection between the cyclone and the recent WWB that has been fueling the growth of el nino.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, raindancewx said:

I really don't get the "coldest winter evah" rah-rah stuff for the NE I see for the sunspot stuff. I use solar data in my analogs, but it seems to mostly impact certain things about storm tracks, cloud formation and storm positions, you have to combine it with other things. The -NAO seems to really be a function of the Atlantic and solar activity as a blend, more than one or the other.

If solar matters, we have the opposite of 1957, 1958, 1968, 2002 and 2014 for solar, those are cold/modoki winters.

But similar to 1976, 1977 and 2009.

If the PDO matters, we don't have the major positive PDO readings of 1986, 2002, 2014, etc. The PDO if anything looks to be trending more negative which is a warm signal for the East.

I'm willing to bet that the PDO will elevate as el nino grows.

If El Nino formation patterns matter we are opposite of 2009, and many other severe winters that started in Nino 1.2 in July-Sept.

Again, this criteria is only of significance to you. This event is solidly between 2006 and 2009 on the modoki scale...not opposite of 2009.

If the QBO matters, the metric should be positive soon.

Yes, very similar to 1977. The QBO is but one factor, and while a +QBO is less favorable, it is not prohibitive to blocking, nor a cold/ snowy east. Nor is it prohibitive to a very favorable PAC regime. I think 2004 was similar QBO, as well.

I may be wrong on this, but I think there is some research the transition area (weak west) from east to westerly QBO is also favorable for blocking. I could be wrong, though.

If ENSO type matters, we have a subsurface trending very warm and more easterly, even if that just takes the event to a basin-wide or hybrid look instead of Nino 1.2 focus.

Okay. Agreed...this will not be as extreme a modoki as 2009.

If the Arctic matters, you have vastly less sea-ice right now than 1976, 1977, 1986, 2002, or even 2009 or 2014.

Doesn't a dearth of sea ice correlate to a more high latitude blocking? Regardless, why would sea ice comparisons to 2014, 2002 and 1986 matter much, since they were Pacific driven harsh eastern winters?

The Atlantic is also incredibly warm by the East Coast and seems like it would promote warm lows throughout winter, even if it leads to more storminess and precipitation. You can already see the effect with how much warmer the East was than in October 2002.

Do you have literature regarding this? I have lived here my entire life, and first of all, the ssts are highly malleable, cool rapidly one the temperature does. Secondly, they are really only relevant when there is a coastal storm to shift the winds to the onshore NE trajectory....otherwise the predominate flow is from west to east, but you know this. Even during coastal storms, the marine layer will only translate about 30 miles inland in even in the most anomalously strong accompanying easterly fetch. All you need id a well placed HP, and its half of that, if lucky via some ageostrophic magic.

My main take away from this is increased baroclinic potential for cyclogensis, which likely translates to more NE snow in the absence of an obnoxiously mild regime.

Boston (+2.5F warmer high), Philly (+1.5F warmer high), Atlanta (+4.3F warmer high), Richmond (+4.7F warmer high), Jacksonville (+1.6 warmer high), all finished warmer than October 2002, presumably due to the Atlantic being warmer on the coast. 

 

Finally, If one of the most prominent volcanic eruptions on the globe matters, the 1991-1992 and 1994-1995 el nino events are pretty useless as analogs, however you continue to cite them as viable, while discarding 2009 due to the location of the first observed positive sst anomaly during the evolution of that particular ENSO event. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with most of your points, Ray.

 

The biggest takeaway from this ENSO event is twofold for me:

1. It is NOT east based. It is central/west based...whether you classify it as central or west is almost purely a semantical matter for the downstream sensible wx aspect in North America. The important detail is that is is not an EP El Nino.

2. It is weak...or low end moderate at most. This matters in relation to the formation of the STJ. The STJ is also affected by position as well...it tends to be more influential in EP El Ninos but even in modokis like 2009 it is present. The weaker events will produce a weaker STJ and that obviously matters for snow events on the east coast. Weaker STJ also tends to have colder winters in the east.

 

None of this guarantees anything obviously.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...