Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

North Indian Ocean Cyclone season 2013


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 217
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The last track map I took and plotted onto Google Earth so everyone can see where this Cyclone is heading. Looks like the city of Brahmapur.

 

 

Considering it has currently deviated about 50 miles to the south of that track, with a 6hr heading of 285, I think landfall will be further south the coast, closer to Srikakulam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering it has currently deviated about 50 miles to the south of that track, with a 6hr heading of 285, I think landfall will be further south the coast, closer to Srikakulam

 

O, that far! Looks like in addition to surge, the mountains just a little bit inland will really take a beating with heavy rain. Terrain between 2000-4000ft.

Mudslides, rock slides will likely be common with this system. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7.3 886.6 +0.0 149.0 7.3 7.6 7.6

 

The CIMISS ADT has been a bit more conservative....I notice both it and the NOAA ADT has been fluctuating wildly in the last few hours - at this level of intensity perhaps the automated algorithm begins to break down?

 

 

                     UW - CIMSS                    

              ADVANCED DVORAK TECHNIQUE      

                  ADT-Version 8.1.5               

         Tropical Cyclone Intensity Algorithm      

             ----- Current Analysis -----

     Date :  11 OCT 2013    Time :   190000 UTC

      Lat :   16:58:00 N     Lon :   87:01:06 E

     CI# /Pressure/ Vmax 6.8 / 925.1mb/134.8kt

             Final T#  Adj T#  Raw T#

                6.8     7.1     7.1

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The CIMISS ADT has been a bit more conservative....I notice both it and the NOAA ADT has been fluctuating wildly in the last few hours - at this level of intensity perhaps the automated algorithm begins to break down?

 

 

                     UW - CIMSS                    

              ADVANCED DVORAK TECHNIQUE      

                  ADT-Version 8.1.5               

         Tropical Cyclone Intensity Algorithm      

             ----- Current Analysis -----

     Date :  11 OCT 2013    Time :   190000 UTC

      Lat :   16:58:00 N     Lon :   87:01:06 E

     CI# /Pressure/ Vmax 6.8 / 925.1mb/134.8kt

             Final T#  Adj T#  Raw T#

                6.8     7.1     7.1

 

Yeah I'd love to see a "true" intensity over time chart with storms this powerful, as slight, short-lived environmental permutations probably have huge impacts on the actual strength of the system 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I'd love to see a "true" intensity over time chart with storms this powerful, as slight, short-lived environmental permutations probably have huge impacts on the actual strength of the system 

 

 

Well, the real long-term answer is affordable, persistent UAV reconnaissance of storms in all basins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The CIMISS ADT has been a bit more conservative....I notice both it and the NOAA ADT has been fluctuating wildly in the last few hours - at this level of intensity perhaps the automated algorithm begins to break down?

 

 

                     UW - CIMSS                    

              ADVANCED DVORAK TECHNIQUE      

                  ADT-Version 8.1.5               

         Tropical Cyclone Intensity Algorithm      

             ----- Current Analysis -----

     Date :  11 OCT 2013    Time :   190000 UTC

      Lat :   16:58:00 N     Lon :   87:01:06 E

     CI# /Pressure/ Vmax 6.8 / 925.1mb/134.8kt

             Final T#  Adj T#  Raw T#

                6.8     7.1     7.1

 

 

Maybe because the eye is so small and the satellite resolution rather poor in that area, the eye temperature is not being well measured?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe because the eye is so small and the satellite resolution rather poor in that area, the eye temperature is not being well measured?

 

  Probably a good guess; speaking of same:

 

2013OCT11 190000  7.3  886.6   +0.0  149.0  7.3 7.6 7.6  NO LIMIT  OFF  OFF    4.64 -81.25  EYE     16 IR  44.9   17.04  -87.03 

2013OCT11 193000  7.3  886.6   +0.0  149.0  7.2 6.3 5.3  0.7T/6hr   ON  OFF  -64.56 -78.29  EMBC     N/A   44.9   17.46  -86.80 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the real long-term answer is affordable, persistent UAV reconnaissance of storms in all basins.

Given the impacts that the environment has on its member states, I wonder why the UN isn't more active in sponsoring that type of surveillance and research (sorry, this is off-topic I guess)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  Probably a good guess; speaking of same:

 

2013OCT11 190000  7.3  886.6   +0.0  149.0  7.3 7.6 7.6  NO LIMIT  OFF  OFF    4.64 -81.25  EYE     16 IR  44.9   17.04  -87.03 

2013OCT11 193000  7.3  886.6   +0.0  149.0  7.2 6.3 5.3  0.7T/6hr   ON  OFF  -64.56 -78.29  EMBC     N/A   44.9   17.46  -86.80 

Haha, the eye temp dropped 69.5c in 30 minutes, that would be some type of open ocean weakening record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha, the eye temp dropped 69.5c in 30 minutes, that would be some type of open ocean weakening record.

 

 

Well, in the 1930 image the eywall convection seems to have warmed quite a bit, but the eye itself looks to have suddenly wobbled back north - I suspect the algorithm simply doesn't have the eye in the right place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...