Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,529
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    northernriwx
    Newest Member
    northernriwx
    Joined

Winter 2012-2013


TheTrials

Recommended Posts

I put together a graphic.

Using the 6 closest years that matched the same snowfall totals as last winter.. Here's how the very next winter looked for these locations. Every location had practically double the amount of snow the following winter (minus a couple years).

In Connecticut, the Winter of 1950-51 had just 13.70", but the following year brought nearly two feet (23.50").

The Winter of 1999-00 just 13.30" of snow, the following year (2000-01) brought more than four feet (52.2") to the coast.

The Winter of 1988-89 just over a foot (13") of snow fell, the following winter (1989-90) dumped 31.3".

Check out the other cities and numbers. Take a look at Boston after their 1994-95 winter. :o

NextYearsSnowSigned.jpg

There are no other years that had closer amounts of last years.

Important to note.. Just because it was double... it doesnt mean it was above normal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 727
  • Created
  • Last Reply

the el nino development has taken a kick to the groin...It still can develop later on or next year...here are some analogs that had enso that warmed during the Summer from winters low only to cool off by late fall and winter...No year went from a minus 1.000 to plus 1.000 on the mei index like 2012 and then dropped to plus 0.271...1951 is the closest...

mei index....................................

year....Dec/Jan.....July/Aug*.....Nov/Dec...* some peak enso came before/after the JA period...

2012.....-1.046.......1.139........

1951.....-1.068.......0.739*........0.467

2008.....-1.012.......0.136........-0.667

1943.....-1.257.......0.505........-0.347

1891.....-0.557.......0.360*.......-0.188

the best fit for the JMA is 1891 and 1934...

JMA index...

2012.....-3.....9

2011.....-9.....3.....-4

2008...-10.....6.....-3

2001.....-2.....2.....-3

1993......2.....9......4

1990.....-1.....4......2

1948......1.....5......0

1947.....-1.....2.....-3

1945.....-9.....1...-10

1944.....-4.....4.....-8

1943...-14.....1.....-6

1937.....-3.....3.....-3

1934.....-1.....8.....-1

1932......2...10......3

1917...-18.....4.....-8

1891.....-1.....8......3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the el nino development has taken a kick to the groin...It still can develop later on or next year...here are some analogs that had enso that warmed during the Summer from winters low only to cool off by late fall and winter...No year went from a minus 1.000 to plus 1.000 on the mei index like 2012 and then dropped to plus 0.271...1951 is the closest...

That year continues to rear its ugly head, and as far as ENSO/PDO/NAO so far it looks like a good analog. On the bright side, it was a very good analog for spring/summer, but it's not often that we follow a particular year so well for 2+ consecutive seasons. Hopefully the Oct/Nov data swings the NAO likelihood in the other direction as the early indicators say positive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That year continues to rear its ugly head, and as far as ENSO/PDO/NAO so far it looks like a good analog. On the bright side, it was a very good analog for spring/summer, but it's not often that we follow a particular year so well for 2+ consecutive seasons. Hopefully the Oct/Nov data swings the NAO likelihood in the other direction as the early indicators say positive.

snowfall from 1949-50 to 1954-55...

season amount...

1949-50...13.8"

1950-51...11.6"

1951-52...19.7"

1952-53...15.1"

1953-54...15.8"

1954-55...11.5"

that winter was the best of a six year snow drought...it was close to 1965-66's 21.4"...1951-52 had it's moments but failed to produce a major storm...Mid December had a 3" snow/rain event that would have been 10" if it came in February...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

snowfall from 1949-50 to 1954-55...

season amount...

1949-50...13.8"

1950-51...11.6"

1951-52...19.7"

1952-53...15.1"

1953-54...15.8"

1954-55...11.5"

that winter was the best of a six year snow drought...it was close to 1965-66's 21.4"...1951-52 had it's moments but failed to produce a major storm...Mid December had a 3" snow/rain event that would have been 10" if it came in February...

51-52 looks just fine if our goal is to avoid any type of repeat of 11-12. Considering that the NE wind off the sound prevented even one flake of snow from falling in my neighborhood during the October storm, my 11-12 total of about 4.5 inches will be shattered by a winter like 51-52. I say bring it on lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure, speaking to some of the largest energy traders in the street the consensus is 1 to 2 below normal in Notheast ( I TOOK TOP END ) with normal snowfall ( I TOOK TOP END ) . Take a peak at NAT GAS in the last month fund managers are gearing up for a draw down in supply this winter in the northeast . Buying out month upside calls ( rates are low , so the carry is cheap ) and selling downside puts to finance it ..

I have not run into too many fund managers who`s private METS believe this winter is a warm one in the northeast .Drillers are starting to filter back into the marcelles shale increasing production

you dont do that infront of warm winters .

You guys can debate model run to model run , and you can guess the strength of the El Nino

and what kind of blocking takes hold .As of now there are models already looking colder than they did a month ago .

As for me I am giving you some insight on what Derivatives traders r thinking

hope that helps clarifies it .

It does explain your reasoning...and may I add..I hope the money guys collect..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think we're going to punt nov/dec with that vortex

That's a conclusion I'm not ready to jump to yet especially considering it's Oct 8. The vortex still seems somewhat transient even on the medium range ensembles. It's nothing like the black death hole that we dealt with last year.

http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~fxg1/ENSHGTAVGNH_12z/ensloopmref.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a conclusion I'm not ready to jump to yet especially considering it's Oct 8. The vortex still seems somewhat transient even on the medium range ensembles. It's nothing like the black death hole that we dealt with last year.

http://www.meteo.psu...nsloopmref.html

Yes it is way too early to assume that. Some just see what they want to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's Sunday...bordem settling in.

Taking the actual monthly average for October, November, December, January, & February since 1990 for Syracuse, NY it almost seems like when October is warm most of the winter is also .. and Vice versa when October is cold. Some years dont end up with the result.

Do you guys see or dont see anything here regarding the relation of temps in October or November compared to winter? Look close.

For instance, 1995-96 october was warm but November was colder than normal and so was the rest of the winter. 1996-97 October was normal November was cold but rest of winter was warm.

Are there more yeys than neys?

Temps2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New JAMSTEC Oct update is in, and it's not too dissimilar from Sept, but even more of a Nina-ish signal for the United States. -PDO/-PNA look w/ the coldest anomalies in the West and northern Plains, moderating as one heads eastward, with the warmest anomalies right along the East Coast. Precip however is above normal for the Eastern US. Also looks to be some -EPO/-NAO blocking.

qr0vn4.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New JAMSTEC Oct update is in, and it's not too dissimilar from Sept, but even more of a Nina-ish signal for the United States. -PDO/-PNA look w/ the coldest anomalies in the West and northern Plains, moderating as one heads eastward, with the warmest anomalies right along the East Coast. Precip however is above normal for the Eastern US. Also looks to be some -EPO/-NAO blocking.

This certainly isn't the worst thing we could see at this point, although i'm sure some will freak out about the positive anomalies. I always like to see signs of continued blocking especially near the poles this time of year. It's about time to start paying attention to snow/ice coverage especially the net change in Siberia as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...