Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,514
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    EWR757
    Newest Member
    EWR757
    Joined

12Z GFS Euro etc. model thread


Midlo Snow Maker

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Since Mildo made a new model thread --

I would argue the ridge in the Western Plains is a bit more pronounced on the 12z GFS then it was on the 12z NAM at 42 hrs on the h5. Is that correct?

Individual height lines at the peak of the ridge do appear a bit farther north on the GFS, with the exception of the 540 line, which is a little farther south. Ridge axis seems titled a bit farther east as well on the GFS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Mildo made a new model thread --

I would argue the ridge in the Western Plains is a bit more pronounced on the 12z GFS then it was on the 12z NAM at 42 hrs on the h5. Is that correct?

I can't tell but from the 48 hr foreast it looks to me like it is still going to keep its more sheared look than the nam or euro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too much IMBY/regional posting within the threads? I've noticed that, on top of the synoptic discussion, there's embedded regional stuff in there as well.

i guess... it's just some good posters are in other regions and i dont want to read 6 12z gfs threads... and model watching is more interconnected than a lot ot things

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Typical difference between the GFS and NAM. GFS is so progressive it more or less obliterates the clipper. The good news is that it seems to be getting a bit higher in the QPF outputs, as well as not entirely shearing it out. I think one can safely forecast some light snow potential in VA at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...