brooklynwx99
-
Posts
5,668 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
American Weather
Media Demo
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by brooklynwx99
-
hilarious when comparing to the 18z EPS. like what the fuck it's a wholesale synoptic feature that just isn't there on the EPS at 5 days out! crazy one of these models is going to be really, really, really wrong -
I'm just happy that the GFS is digging in its heels. something has to give, and it doesn't seem to be the GFS right now we can work with the GFS for sure at 7 days out. brings significant wintry precip and it still has a lot of issues
-
after the hellacious front end thump? that's like 8" in 6 hours for most
-
GFS looks amazing weaker initial S/W and the TPV is much stronger, which will provide more confluence
-
looks like the GFS might actually have the right idea here. not budging from its idea at 18z at all if anything, the TPV lobe is a touch stronger
-
looks like the GFS has fused the two S/Ws. really interesting. no idea where this will go, but I can assure that it won't be like the ECMWF in its evolution
-
18z GEFS improved snowfall for most
-
we will absolutely take at 7 days out
-
yeah, the GFS was more amplified because of the S/W. the synoptic evolution is absolutely nothing like the ECMWF this run was just typical Day 7 noise, not a step towards the ECMWF
-
the more important thing here is that the GFS held serve synoptically and the ICON made a big shift towards it if the ECMWF makes the same synoptic changes, it bodes much better for a coastal storm. keep in mind that this is still 7 days out
-
I'll take this at 7 days out. the good thing is that the evolution is absolutely nothing like the ECMWF there's going to be a lot of noise at this range, which is expected anyway
-
we're seeing better confluence downstream. might be more amped, but this is also nice to see. heights are much more zonal into New England I'm happy with this run overall
-
S/W also coming in more meridionally, allowing it to dig more and have a chance at passing S. TPV also nudging into NE more than the last run... look at the more zonal orientation of the wind barbs in PA, for example this run will produce another monster storm
-
prepare for takeoff
-
once you get to days 4-5, the differences are glaring
-
not even close. if the ECMWF ticks towards the GFS it's game on. the GFS should produce again this run
-
just comical. not even close GFS should be big again
-
GFS is not even on the same planet as the ECMWF with the handling of the TPV. not even close look at the separation in BC. two distinct pieces
-
GFS is not even on the same planet as the ECMWF with the handling of the TPV. not even close look at the separation in BC. two distinct pieces
-
GFS is not even on the same planet as the ECMWF with the handling of the TPV. not even close look at the separation in BC. two distinct pieces instead of one congealed pile of crap
-
GFS steadfast with its handling of the AK vort
-
GFS likely going to hold serve. handling the AK vort pretty much exactly the same
-
the ICON made a sizeable shift towards the GFS in terms of its handling of the TPV this is likely due to the stronger AK vort, which slows it down and allows the some of the TPV to slip out ahead of it. if the GFS holds, it might actually be handling that piece of energy well... we'll see in a bit
-
the change in the ICON's handling of the TPV comes down to a change in the strength of the AK vort it made a sizeable shift towards the GFS with a stronger vort, which leads to a much more favorable TPV configuration. if the GFS holds, it might be onto something after all
-
the pattern supports a very large storm, and people take that and assume a blizzard is guaranteed... it doesn't work like that this is why it's so frustrating trying to communicate potential. people come up with grandiose ideas in their imaginations and forget that this is a matter of a 1-2% chance rising to like 30-40%. it's still unlikely, just much, much more likely than normal
