Jump to content

brooklynwx99

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    5,651
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by brooklynwx99

  1. FWIW the ICON still looks to be in the GFS's camp
  2. the ECMWF has made a definite shift towards the GFS in its handling of the AK vort much more amplified
  3. thanks for understanding. i’ll refrain from now on - unless it’s egregious hahaha I really don’t know what to think here. I still think everything is on the table. the foreign models do give me pause but the GFS suite is holding strong and other models are ticking. the GEFS is insane this is going to be a biggggg weekend
  4. sorry… did not mean to come off as judgemental. just want everyone to keep a level head as much as possible this is going to be a doozy to track and if one invests too much emotionally, it’s going to be a bad time. trust me, I have prepared for the GFS to have egg on its face and for everyone to rain… I would probably rage a bit too
  5. the angst over a 70 mile difference between rain and snow at day 7 is quite silly, too I feel like people just have to take a couple days and let this play out. we'll know what's up by Monday, most likely
  6. hilarious when comparing to the 18z EPS. like what the fuck it's a wholesale synoptic feature that just isn't there on the EPS at 5 days out! crazy one of these models is going to be really, really, really wrong
  7. I'm just happy that the GFS is digging in its heels. something has to give, and it doesn't seem to be the GFS right now we can work with the GFS for sure at 7 days out. brings significant wintry precip and it still has a lot of issues
  8. GFS looks amazing weaker initial S/W and the TPV is much stronger, which will provide more confluence
  9. looks like the GFS might actually have the right idea here. not budging from its idea at 18z at all if anything, the TPV lobe is a touch stronger
  10. looks like the GFS has fused the two S/Ws. really interesting. no idea where this will go, but I can assure that it won't be like the ECMWF in its evolution
  11. yeah, the GFS was more amplified because of the S/W. the synoptic evolution is absolutely nothing like the ECMWF this run was just typical Day 7 noise, not a step towards the ECMWF
  12. the more important thing here is that the GFS held serve synoptically and the ICON made a big shift towards it if the ECMWF makes the same synoptic changes, it bodes much better for a coastal storm. keep in mind that this is still 7 days out
  13. I'll take this at 7 days out. the good thing is that the evolution is absolutely nothing like the ECMWF there's going to be a lot of noise at this range, which is expected anyway
  14. we're seeing better confluence downstream. might be more amped, but this is also nice to see. heights are much more zonal into New England I'm happy with this run overall
  15. S/W also coming in more meridionally, allowing it to dig more and have a chance at passing S. TPV also nudging into NE more than the last run... look at the more zonal orientation of the wind barbs in PA, for example this run will produce another monster storm
  16. once you get to days 4-5, the differences are glaring
  17. not even close. if the ECMWF ticks towards the GFS it's game on. the GFS should produce again this run
  18. just comical. not even close GFS should be big again
×
×
  • Create New...