Jump to content

brooklynwx99

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    5,668
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by brooklynwx99

  1. GEFS did the same thing and it’s had two colder runs in a row
  2. meh, it’s one run. GEFS did the same crap at 06z just to revert back colder. wouldn’t make too much out of it unless it consistently showed that
  3. yeah the confluence keeps ticking stronger. makes sense tho, as the models are probably “feeling” the developing block, this is the adjustment you’d expect them to make, if anything I would feel great if I was in CT, especially Valley west. a solid 4-8” event is becoming more of a probability
  4. GEFS is improved again… more confluence over SE Canada and a slightly weaker S/W lead to a colder, farther S track. this is a monster signal for this range
  5. as expected, snowfall is farther SE. this is an absolute monster signal for this range
  6. colder and farther S as a result of those changes. this is the second GEFS run in a row to make this shift
  7. GEFS is more favorable than 12z… lower heights in SE Canada and a slightly less amped S/W
  8. I have said nothing even close to resembling that. not even close to the same thing there's a difference between comparing a potential pattern to one that has produced KUs in the past with like 10 different caveats applied and whatever that post was to start the thread. they aren't comparable
  9. EPS is really nice. stronger S/W but also more confluence, leads to a colder, stronger storm
  10. that's why you just don't say things like that more than 48 - 72 hours unless you have a pristine synoptic setup
  11. the GEFS also has a legit KU pattern once towards the 10th but we can put that on the backburner for now
  12. it's really tough to say at this point in time. I'm leaning towards the GEPS/EPS only because they have more confluence, which is what you'd expect with a developing block. this isn't really relevant to you guys, but this has been happening with the Monday system... confluence has been steadily increasing over the last day or so, which is leading to a farther S track not to say that this will happen here, but I would lean towards that rather than a complete lack of confluence
  13. there's enough cold air if the SLP runs to the south with all of that confluence over SE Canada
  14. this is what you want. stout S/W over Ark-La-Tex with lots of confluence over SE Canada
  15. just a massive signal for a storm of some sort on the 4th
  16. definitely better. not great, but a big improvement. definitely more similar to 00z than 06z
  17. improvement on the GEFS... lower heights out ahead of the trough and in SE Canada. should be colder
  18. I would consider this a general improvement to the height field over SE Canada. OP runs gonna OP run this cuts because the GFS phases with the NS vort in MN/IA. if that vort kicks ahead and interacts with the ULL in SE Canada, this would be much farther S. really no way to tell with that kind of stuff at this range
  19. yeah, climo won't matter as much when you have cross-polar flow like that. you can snow until the 20th to the coast with that look. the 10-20th period does look very good, but we'll see if we can cash in on the 4th beforehand. tons of time to go
  20. seems to me like it's being inconsistent. it flip-flopped between 18, 00, and 06z. doesn't inspire much confidence, IMO I can guarantee if the OP is less amped at 12z it will follow lock-step. it's not a good ensemble for illustrating spread. the EPS is easily the best for that. not to say that it's wrong or anything... we can get an inland runner, but it's just been making big shifts on a whim
  21. luckily the GEFS is underdispersive, so it'll follow the OP nine times out of 10. not surprising that it's quite rainy
×
×
  • Create New...