Also a lot of winning before anything has happened lol. I’ve seen too many fails with marginal temps. Consensus is there for significant precip, but snow depth (not snowboard depth) by the end of the storm has a wide range of possible outcomes.
NYC is looking like it could be the real bullseye for this one. Seems like a near perfect storm for them and probably gonna have some insane rates once that coastal gets cookin.
What could possibly go wrong?
But seriously, tomorrow is gonna be an absolute nothing burger until that coastal kicks in. Temps look like they'll be in the mid 30s throughout area until early evening.
I just think the “differences” we’re talking about are because of land vs ocean snow maps more so than the models being all that far apart. If this storm was a cutter we probably wouldn’t even notice it lol.
You have the job I (and probably half the forum) wanted. I mean who tf takes diffeq, calc3 and 3 sems of physics and goes into IT, smh lol. Hope you’re right…euro has been stubborn so far.
It caught onto the idea of the coastal first but the euro has barely budged either once it latched on, and is the best model. It’s foolish to think the gfs is right before the storm even starts.
Coastals usually form too late for us. We’ll get snow, but these systems always target northeast md (lower end) to Boston (high end). It’s the case like 95% of the time.
Not super ideal though for those further east. Wet snow looks awesome, but power outages could be a thing for those closer to the coast with lower ratios.
I’m becoming bullish on our area for this one. We might do pretty well being on the windward side of the blue ridge. The screw zone will be somewhere in between due to temps and getting fringed by the developing coastal.