Jump to content

jm1220

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    24,725

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by jm1220

  1. jm1220
    Snowmelt from the mountains (where there’s also upslope heavy rain on S winds) is adding to the flooding downriver. Models pegged those mountains to get crushed. Yep, terrible situation there.
  2. jm1220
    In Long Beach the ocean came up to the boardwalk dunes. Looks like severe erosion. Would have been much worse if high tide was 5 hours earlier.
  3. jm1220
    Farmingdale gusted to 44 last hour. Branches were swaying in my backyard but not as bad as before. Cleared up fast however once rain ended.
  4. jm1220
    In 97-98 we had plenty of storms track SE of us and it was still rain because of the putrid airmass. It should improve as we head into Jan and I’m not saying this is 97-98 again but especially on the coast we’d like a colder airmass nearby to be wrapped into any storm. A good track doesn’t guarantee snow near/east of the city.
  5. jm1220
    Yep, wind definitely kicked up again here. Mod-heavy rain.
  6. jm1220
    Had a chance to get a better look around, more damage than I thought. Some big limbs and a few trees down, lots of debris/blown around decorations etc. Not Isaias in 2020 bad but it was a nasty one. And now the flooding is getting bad on the S Shore with high tide.
  7. jm1220
    Looks like NYC East about to get soaked in about an hour from this southern low extension. Maybe another burst of winds too.
  8. jm1220
    Flooding is gonna be bad in a couple hours even though worst impacts aren’t timed with high tide.
  9. jm1220
    Maybe I spoke too soon then, haven’t gotten out beyond my immediate neighborhood.
  10. jm1220
    Thunder here. Thankfully looks like it was a pretty modest event here. Not noticing many branches down, never lost power and I have only about 1.3” so far.
  11. jm1220
    If the low's in the low 980s and goes through eastern PA, we're probably in for it from the city east in terms of wind. There'll be less rain but the ground is already soaked and there have already been heavy showers around. I'd definitely take 1" more rain for less wind/coastal flooding. Edit-maybe this double low hanging south from the main low can spare us somewhat. Fingers crossed.
  12. jm1220
    More often than not these are overhyped wind wise but we don’t have much of an inversion this time to stop the winds from making it to the surface. The low isn’t very consolidated when it gets here which might be our saving grace this time of anything. If there’s some double low structure, much of the high wind might be kept offshore or be brief. But instead that might increase the heavy rains.
  13. jm1220
    Thank goodness. We’d be looking at major flooding area wide at the beaches/back bays at worse timing. Might still be a bad flood event regardless.
  14. jm1220
    Tons of moisture coming in with this one-plenty from the Gulf and enhanced from the Nino Pacific. I do think some will get slammed: 3-5” if not more for someone. The heaviest rain should be near the low track, strong winds east.
  15. jm1220
    Thankfully we’re not at new moon, otherwise we’d have big problems. Even without that we’re probably in for major beach erosion. Edit-NWS calling for moderate to major flooding at Point Lookout, Freeport and Lindenhurst.
  16. jm1220
    Yep, not good news in terms of wind here with the last minute west trends. It’ll diminish the rain threat here, but places that upslope on SE winds will probably get 3-5”.
  17. jm1220
    Every other model is way further west with the heavy rain but even the 1-2" the other models have with the strong winds will cause issues.
  18. jm1220
    If the low goes well west of us we won't see heavy training rain like we saw last time. We'll have heavy rain bands to a dryslot while the steadier rain goes near the low track. This isn't tropical and Ida also didn't track well west of NYC.
  19. jm1220
    What's interesting with this NAM run (I know, NAM) is that the N stream follow up wave closes off at hr84 over WV. If that was to stay closed off and roll south of us, that's the one way we can see a possibly snowy outcome. Otherwise it would probably be just some rain/snow squalls. I'm more concerned about winds here and near the coast if the track is through central PA as most models have now and it's a strong 980mb type system. Doesn't look like really any inversion to stop the winds transferring to the ground and we'll have heavy rain bands to help as well. If the low is closer to the coast there'll be more rain but the big winds stay offshore.
  20. jm1220
    Doesn’t seem like much of an inversion this time so it might be legit. But usually these are a nowcast situation. And won’t take much wind to cause tree damage because of saturated ground.
  21. jm1220
    Well has he really been wrong? Agenda or not we know how things turned out.
  22. jm1220
    SE wind really brings the moisture. Could be flooding issues where SE upslope wrings it out-notice again SE Catskills, Poconos.
  23. jm1220
    I would think just inland and where elevations get hilly would be favored for heavy rain in this event. Models are hitting the upslope aspects of a strong SE flow hard-notice the rain maxes in the Berkshires, E Catskills, Poconos etc.
  24. jm1220
    Might be bogus but 0z GFS does get some good SE wind for the NJ shore and LI, would likely be some 50-60mph gusts. Temps spiking ahead of the low would help mix them down, and as we all see the low is quite strong. The strong SE flow would also help an upslope component to enhance the rain for inland areas. But hopefully the fast movement and vertical stacking keep this a more 1-2" rain event vs firehose deluge like Sunday. Unless the northern stream low can pinch off south of us after the main low passes I wouldn't expect more than snow showers, but it would add a wintry appeal at least.
  25. jm1220
    Down to 27 here.
×
×
  • Create New...