Jump to content

BxEngine

Moderators
  • Posts

    17,517
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BxEngine

  1. Visibility is less than 200’ on the palisades in bergen and rockland. Worst ive seen in a while.
  2. Ambulance just flipped in northern westchester, sounds like some roads arent great still.
  3. Damage is long done before that warmth gets that far north.
  4. Lets at least tell the truth, boxing day was nowhere near locked in. 3 days before it showed roughly what todays 12z gfs showed for us for thursday. Cmon people.
  5. Just curious…how many times do we compare our snow totals to “good” seasons? Because all those good seasons had storms like this too, that got washed away either immediately or melted fairly quickly. So if we dont care about it now, we shouldnt count them in our seasonal snow totals either. Gotta lower 95-96 by some i guess.
  6. Saying they are less skillful is a completely different argument than “they receive no new data”. Thats simply not true. Back to the storm thread.
  7. https://ams.confex.com/ams/27WAF23NWP/webprogram/Handout/Paper273676/GFS4cycle_2015_NWP_Chicago_15A.pdf
  8. No, thats not true. They have less new data, especially upper air, but they still incorporate new data in between.
  9. if your previous posts about non weather are disappearing, maybe take a few min break. Go find some snow or something.
  10. I need a trough in the east but no storms between the 28th and march 6th. Thanks to whoever makes that happen.
  11. D is hysterical lol im almost halfway to my avg winter total, we’ve had more snow events than most of the last few seasons, and its been colder than avg. at worst its a C right now.
  12. 4” on the nose. 3rd event of at least a few inches, plus a white christmas, and a below avg (yeah yeah i know still warm as hell, not the point rjay lol) winter so far. Throw in a double digit storm at some point and this winter goes to a B+ or A- quickly.
  13. Agreed. Active patterns are at least not boring as hell, and we’ve had snow events. If we arent gonna get a monster storm, ill take this over the alternatives. Its february. Rooting for warm and dry is weird.
  14. Moderate to borderline heavy snow now. Im supposed to be in warwick at 10 am for a function, id really like to not have to go so if this changes to ice and screws the roads up till noon i wouldnt complain.
  15. Base of sleet with snow on top before ending as freezing rain is gonna make tomorrow morning awesome.
  16. The area surrounded by 84 in orange, 287 in northern jersey down to rt 80, and up the hudson river is in no mans land right now, good luck with that forecast, geez.
  17. Zero anger at all. By stating you thought they got it backwards (which is literally what you said), thats criticism. It may be correct, constructive or otherwise. My point is that even constructive criticism should come from a place of knowledge, or at least using valid points of subjectivity if objectiveness isnt possible. It only takes a few minutes to read through these threads to find shitty troll posts criticizing the nws and then asking “what does this model show” etc. Criticism coming from a place of knowledge should be allowed and encouraged. But if we cant even be bothered to find basic answers to questions that are easily found on numerous websites, im not sure we should allow questioning of the nws from that point of view. That was my point. I obviously know you arent a troll and the intent wasnt coming from a bad place, but this thread has gotten out of control between the trolls and whining and its frustrating when good posters add to the snowman19 bs lol
  18. Just a thought…if its ok to criticize the professionals, we should probably be able to find this information using modeling websites.
×
×
  • Create New...