Jump to content

weatherwiz

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    76,441
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by weatherwiz

  1. I'd maybe start getting concerned 12z tomorrow if we're continuing to see some of what we're seeing. There's just so much time (even though it doesn't feel like it) really. Hopefully the 0z balloon launches will provide significant value...we can at least see how models are initializing heights in the West. This doesn't help with everything but gives a small idea.
  2. Given how subtle the differences are of capture vs. late capture or no capture...we seriously may have too. I just don't think we're going to get any consistency or agreement on this until it either happens or doesn't
  3. That's very true. I wonder if we'd be better off having an airmass that wasn't as cold. given how cold it is aloft and the type of dendrites we'll likely produce, I would think this can make them more susceptible to being ripped apart. IIRC correctly, I think ratios in 2013 and 2015 under the band were like around 15:1 or so right?
  4. We never touched upon this in any classes but when taking wind into account for it's impact on ratios is it surface winds, winds aloft, a combination of both and then I guess what would you subtract off in terms of ratios for wind? This is something I have zero knowledge on.
  5. may have to make some slight adjustments to it...the west cutoff is going to be extremely sharp. but this is playing out how I was envisioning so can only hope that continues lol.
  6. Maybe a bit stronger and more digging with the northern stream? Actually looks like a bit more robust development of precip within the mid-Atlantic region getting going through the day. Or maybe that's just more of a reflection of moisture along the front
  7. I was going to wait until today but I felt pretty confident yesterday after the 12z suite. I'll admit some of the afternoon runs were certainly a little nerve-racking. But since then we have continued to see subtle changes in the positive direction at H5. While this hasn't been reflected at the surface (yet) on some models, models are often lagged with reflecting surface changes in response to H5 changes...but as stated there are surface features which could end up having a much larger impact (dual-low for example). As long as those continue I am highly confident we will get extremely heavy snow into much of Connecticut. It will not take much to pile up the snow given the ratios and degree of lift that will be associated with the band.
  8. Sure there are surface features (convection, double-barrel low structure) but these are so complex and it's extremely difficult to know if these will materialize or not. There are some instances they do and other instances they don't (even when you have the model agreement).
  9. We continue to see slight improvements (across all models) with the main features aloft. That continues, at this time, to be the most important aspect overall. While it would be great to see these changes reflected within the surface, that is secondary at this point. If these improvements aloft continue I will bet anything all the models end up converging on a more westward track and we'll see heavier QPF thrown more west than what some models indicate. Just given what we're seeing aloft, IMO the chances of more west are much greater than more east.
  10. looks like there were some improvements. At any rate, liking how/where H7 is starting to close off...perhaps not in the sense of verbatim but continued improvements aloft would mean very favorable develops and track of H7
  11. Bruins game and it was the night before my last final exam before graduating and I told myself I was retiring from 40's (unless the Bruins were playing game 7 in the Stanley Cup...of course they did against the Blues the following year but I went to the bar to watch). This may be a special occasion though
×
×
  • Create New...