Ridge in between the s/w and the clipper trough looks weaker, may help keep cold in place better, but might be a weaker storm in terms of less risk that it cuts
Nah I like where it is, the track. Nice and easy E-W just south of us with no mixing issues. It tries to dry slot us early, could be right but precip is likely underdone.
But it’s the ICON a week out, so…
When it got cold Thanksiving - early dec, the CMC verified better than the GFS. Not as good as the Euro, but still did a decent job. I'd pay attention to the CMC
EPS is definitely a step in the right direction. We do want it colder and more suppressed as I’d rather be on the north side a week out than to the south
Not sure why I got weenie tagged for this comment. In the same way, when a perfect track is modeled at 200 hr, chances are it ends up being a cutter unless we get the PV to press down. Still a very NS-driven pattern so models are going to struggle beyond 4-5 days out.
I don’t believe that the PV right over our backyards is going to happen. I think storm tracks will verify further north than modeled, so I would mentally adjust any suppressive looks north.
Gfs op looks weird. Slow moving OH valley low… then it dies… and then not 24 hours later a coastal races by? 500mb looks more like one wave trying to phase with the PV than two separate storms. Either way, it won’t verify close to verbatim.
Gonna slide i think. Wave spacing issues as CAPE said. If the second wave slows down just a bit, it’ll get more room to dig and amp with the 50/50 established
Nice pass that gives us 4-8” areawide with no mixing.
Biggest takeaway is that everything is on the table at this point. We should be able to pull some wintry precip out of this upcoming period.
I’d take it, tbh. I’m not going to play the “sacrifice a more likely storm for a shoot-for-the-moon BECS which may or (more likely) may not happen” game.
First obs from my own ambient station:
63.7
still testing it on my deck so may be running a bit warm, will put it further out imby when I finish testing and replace the batteries with lithium ones
It means the ensembles don’t create enough spread to show all/most possibilities at range. iow, overconfident on one scenario.
AI models also have this problem, which is being worked on.
The GFS ensembles has always had a weaker signal for Jan 9-10 than 6-7. The EPS is opposite, the latter being stronger than the first wave.
I think the op 6z GFS went back to what its ensemble suite was showing the whole time, while the op Euro was showing one of the upper potential scenarios of the ensembles.
I usually lean on the Euro+EPS because it has been the better performing model suite based on recent verification scores in the last couple of months.
Remember guys, when we saw a great pattern modeled for Feb 2024, we did not actually see any snowstorms on the op models at this range. We do now. One step closer.