Jump to content

Terpeast

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    5,364
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Terpeast

  1. Could be a classic N&W burbs winter. But I don’t like this trend.
  2. So a 0% significance means that there is a 100% confidence level that warmer eastern US temp anomalies arise not from random chance, but from the mjo phase 6? if that’s the case, I’m not a fan of the way they use these significance #s. It’s confusing
  3. Mother’s house in Vienna got 10” in Jan 2018 and 9” in Jan 2022.
  4. Looking at phase 6, what does the 0% significance mean?
  5. Agreed. As the 1960s and a winter like 09-10 showed, we don’t need the pdo to flip. We can get away with it being slightly negative
  6. I think we also get a PDO rise in a different mechanism - the strong extended pac jet forms over a baroclinic boundary off Japan with cyclones and fronts responding to this, and as they traverse over the western N Pac, ssts will start to cool and the PDO will rise. Meanwhile we may see a +EPO dominant autumn with that jet, but even that’ll also help drive a little bit of a PDO rise over the US west coast (warmer ssts). The extreme negative PDO will be self limiting eventually. Been seeing a hint of this in the day 5-15 ensembles
  7. Note this jet originates from the warm pool off Japan. When the season turns colder from northern Japan on down, that baroclinic boundary will become powerful and fuel that pac jet on steroids. Exactly what I’ve been expecting to happen. It’ll take some time to work through that until they’re not so extremely warm anymore and the jet normalizes. Probably a few months.
  8. It looks like a transition from east based to basin wide
  9. That one’s also on my running list of analogs
  10. Not the best sign, but do we know how much the water vapor contributed to the near-record +aao? Could it still have been solidly positive regardless had tonga not happened? Not sure there’s anyway to find out after the fact, but it may compete with -qbo while determining the average state of the AO this winter
  11. Think I’ve said it before when debating with psuhoffman, December has never been a big wintry month even when I was a kid growing up here in the MA during a much colder base climate. December 2009, and to a lesser extent, 2002, were special.
  12. At least it got the west of 180 forcing right. Maybe that’s something to take into account for winter
  13. For now yes. But these VP anoms seem to change every week. This may look totally different this time next week.
  14. With all the model volatility, maybe the “lets wait till its within 10 days” should be revised down to 6-7 days… even with the ensembles
  15. BWI: Nov 3 IAD: Nov 1 DCA: Nov 29 RIC: Nov 21 BWI departure +1.0
  16. The nice visual aside, I imagine the warmer gulf and carribbean (over 30c right now) might get the SS to amplify more and shift the storm track a bit north, so what used to be a deep southern slider and a MA miss may become a MA hit. Also what used to be a MA hit SNE miss may hit SNE instead. Could be wrong, so we’ll see.
  17. Yeah, I don’t get it either. I don’t understand the “super” talk when we’re at high-end moderate and holding (or weak, if you prefer using MEI)
  18. What's the link again for the daily enso data? I keep forgetting
  19. Worth considering whether the super warm north atlantic might be driving a predominant -nao. It does make sense when I think about how much heat is transported north between greenland and scandinavia
  20. Low of 52 imby. Think some low level stratus prevented me from radiating as well as I should
  21. Let’s see if this holds inside 5-10 days, and if it does, that’s good news we’d be able to hold a +pna despite record -pdo
×
×
  • Create New...