Jump to content

Terpeast

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    5,399
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Terpeast

  1. Nearest cocohras came in at 0.76”
  2. 0.6” from nearest personal station. felt like a lot more than that imby, will check cocohras tomorrow
  3. Good hard rainer with gusty winds. Loud thunder. Scared my kid, had to calm her down before putting her down
  4. Reasonable to think that this will be the case for the winter. Also an even split between warm and cold mjo phases
  5. Outside of a couple of week-long heat waves, its been a milder/cooler summer down here overall
  6. Apparently it can flip on a dime as it did in 2019-20. I guess it’s just a waiting game now at this point. CPC maps based on the cfs v2 does have the WPAC warming up into winter, maybe by a half degree or so. It’s highly unlikely that we can completely shut down the warm mjo phases, but those 30c ssts around the dateline will make 7-8-1 open for business and that’s what we want. A super nino would place forcing too far east, and that scenario is looking increasingly unlikely. Doesn’t mean that a repeat flip in the WPAC is more likely either.
  7. I kinda walk that comment back though, looking at quiet it is in the gulf and carribean. Activity further east and north into the Atlantic is… odd. (source: CWG) And for all the talk of the EQ WPAC pool interfering with this el nino, ssts there are pretty close to normal…
  8. I think that can be partly explained by very cold ssts SW of CA/Baja from the record -pdo of last winter, and on the Atlantic side record sst warmth in the gulf and carribean.
  9. It doesn’t. +pdo more snowfall, -pdo less. I misspoke, it’s not anticorrelated. It’s correlated. Rookie mistake on my part.
  10. WPAC, while still quite warm, is cooler than the large area of warmest ssts around the dateline. That wasn’t the case up until a month or two ago, if I remember correctly, before which the WPAC was warmest.
  11. Worth pointing out that in my own statistical research, the PDO is most strongly anti-correlated with MA snowfall out of any SST index, including ENSO. Correction: PDO is positively correlated (not negatively correlated) with MA snowfall. My bad
  12. Most statistical models had this peaking at 1.0 ONI and dynamic at 2.0 ONI. We’re already at 1.5 on the dailies/weeklies, so it’s reasonable to think that we’ll split the difference at 1.5 ONI peak. The WPAC warm pool has cooled slightly in recent weeks, so given a couple of months for the MEI to catch up, I’m fairly confident of a 1.0 MEI going into winter. There’s also time for another chance for a KW to induce further a bit more warming, but I think its pretty safe to say that super is off the table at this point.
  13. I’ve had more rain in the first 9 days of september than the entire months of May and June combined. Most of it fell in 3 days.
  14. 1.57” imby so far, think that’ll be it for the day based on radar Last 3 days: 0.7” 1.05” 1.58” total 3.33” - more than any monthly total of May, June, and July
  15. 0.85” so far today after 1” yesterday and 0.7” the day before
  16. 0.82” so far, still raining. That last cell may put me at over 1” today. Just maybe
  17. Another one incoming for SE LoCo?! Insane
  18. It was just to the east of me (the hail) At least I got good rainers on consecutive days.
  19. Long duration heavy rain but no wind. Lightened up. Radar looks interesting. Can that western cell merge with the E LoCo train?
×
×
  • Create New...