CheeselandSkies

They've finally corrected/updated the survey to reflect the fact that a cycle occurred just southwest of Keota. So it's now properly two tornadoes, one EF3, one EF4. https://www.weather.gov/dvn/summary_03312023

Gotta love spring in the Midwest.

Reedited my footage to cut out most of the low-contrast approach of the original Ottumwa/Farson tornado, refined my contrast adjustments on some of the shots and actually added a couple seconds to the shot crossing 92 which I had cut when I didn't really need to.

We palmin' now.

Kinda interesting that they haven't seen fit to use it since, even with the extreme conditions of 4/27/11 or that infamous HRRR simulation on 5/20/19.

Do they still have the Ottumwa-Keota-Kalona family as a single EF4 path?

Western Plains especially Kansas desperately need rain. That said it's relatively not too bad further SW in the more traditional EML source region, so kind of a mixed signal for the rest of chase season.

Well, I couldn't catch lightning (or a tornado) in a bottle twice in a row. Spent the afternoon moseying on down from Dubuque to Mt. Pleasant. Didn't want to commit to the stuff further west in Iowa because I thought the mixing problems would kill tornado potential with it. Finally decided to start making my way east on 34 into IL while the seemingly disorganized convective cluster was coming out of MO just to my south. My main goal at this point was just to stay out of any heavy rain/hail from it and start making my way home. Of course this is when it finally got its act together and went tornado warned, but there was no way I could get a view of the base without driving directly through the core, so I just continued heading home. Elevated hailers kept firing all around making for a decent lightning show, but I managed to avoid nearly all precip on the drive up US-67 to the Quad Cities, then north on 61 back to Dubuque and 151 home. Didn't sting nearly as bad as it would have without Friday, though.

HRRR is consistentlly firing a supercell in SE IA between 23 and 00Z, but soundings around it are still either super mixed or have a weird low-level inversion. The favorable environment might exist only right on the warm front, where it's impossible to get an uncontaminated sounding. Low-level shear is monstrous in any case, though. It is also showing some mid-morning convection in the area which you'd think might alleviate the mixing issue, but so far it doesn't seem to be according to the model.

Found the PDS on the NAM despite that hellacious inversion.

NAM cool bias at play again? Just a real headscratcher how we have some models with hot temps/mixing issues and some with capping issues due to cool temps. It is quite dry at 700mb, though. Although I remember people saying dryness at 700mb was gonna be a problem on the Gilmore City day last April.

I wonder if the HRRR is still having those overmixing issues @andyhb mentioned and if so, at what point it will catch on.

Interesting the HRRR still blows up that monster simulated supercell in IL tomorrow but the environment ahead of it is not really impressive...super mixed and with ho-hum low-level shear. I can't get a good sounding in proximity to it that both has impressive parameters and isn't contaminated. Also interesting that the globals (namely EURO) are more bullish on convection than the CAMs.

@andyhb What do you make of some of these RAP soundings? Parameters are absolutely off the chains but there's that pesky low-level inversion. Just the other day we were talking about temps in the 80s and mixing issues, but a lot of these seem too cool (uppers 60s/low 70s) almost like we're more used to seeing from the NAM?

Yeah, I agree on that.

That was initial thinking but now looking like the trough is ejecting more slowly.

With the Day 3 update I'm wondering now if Tuesday's initiation (if any) will be too far west for me to chase, even though it should be quite a bit later than last Friday's. Not really keen on a west of I-35 target after working 3AM-noon. Was one of the things that made Friday a no-brainer go for me.

I think the main things that's' not always conveyed is that oftentimes the sparser the storm coverage, the more dangerous the hazards can be from any one storm. Meteorologists & chasers know it, but EMs and the general public usually do not.

Yeah, I only found out about that when I was looking through the Wikipedia tornado list last night (still waiting on DVN to officially confirm the handoff near Keota instead of having one EF4 path all the way from Wapello County up to Johnson County, been spamming them on Facebook with me and @hlcater's video). Sounds horrible, but they actually got lucky it wasn't a stronger tornado.

Out now...very interesting and rather ominous wording for both ends of the setup (southern one also upgraded to tornado-driven MDT).

The max I do see is 20...right on the Mississippi near Le Claire, IA.

Holy hell. Nearly 5,000 j/kg of SBCAPE in early April...and nearly 300 j/kg 3CAPE. This is just east of Iowa City. Continues to look highly likely I'll be retracing my steps from Friday.

Good luck & stay safe!

Thing was, this supercell/tornado seemingly did everything within the span of about five minutes. Cycle/twins. Cone. Drillbit. Multiple vortices. Helical vortex. "Ghost train" inflow jet. Massive debris cloud. Wedge. Too fast for me to take it all in, especially what with it being my first real significant tornado intercept.

Thanks, @hlcater. I didn't mean to steal your thunder (pun maybe-intended, lol) by linking your video earlier, but I wasn't sure if you were still an active poster on here. Full version of my video is now up, btw.