Cobalt

Past two runs have had increasing separation between the southern and northern waves. That looks like an ample route to a success scenario.

The entirety of this piece is AI generated. The header image, the article's author "Dylan Hartwell", and the full contents of the piece. Every single paragraph has the hallmarks of a ChatGPT-fed prompt. No need to source robot weenies for the December forecast, we have plenty here who will do that job for you for free

The sentiment is appreciated, even if you had to use ChatGPT to write it for you 34F at 12:30am with a forecast low of 23.

but I thought..

Hard to tell with the limited PivotalWX panels, but it appears as if the EPS backed off a bit from the greater +EPO it showed at 0z for the D7+ range.

As opposed to the brutal 4-5-6 response from last year?

Sunday's storm has trended a few mb stronger which seems to help confluence linger around for a bit longer.

12z GFS shows -4C 850 temps at 6z Tuesday for DCA. 0z had +2C during the same timeframe.

An excellent call once again

Not really that crazy, the same thing happened in Feb 2018.

only up to 38F at 1:30pm

BWI: 18.6" DCA: 9.7" IAD: 15.3" RIC: 8.2" Tiebreaker SBY: 8.4"

Ryan Maue purposefully uses language like this to generate reactions on social media, particularly from people who use such tweets as examples of anthro climate change proponents being "extremists" or "doomists". It's funny, because beneath that veil he likely is more aligned with the people who get reactionary when he uses such phrases as "climate breakdown". He served as the chief scientist at NOAA under Trump, and at the time was known for minimizing humanity's role in recent climate trends. Maybe that implies that there's a good bit of sarcasm in that tweet's wording, but it is not the first time he's done such a thing.

Obviously that's done nothing to the climate because in Antarctica it's gone from unfathomably cold to just ridiculously cold.

It's flawed because.. a majority of the research from 50 years ago was correct? That your false recollection from that time of Is just completely and entirely based off of feelings and false memories? I hate to have been the crass out-of-forumer that butted my head in and dragged this on way longer than it needed to, but genuinely, there are incredibly smart people in this forum all around you. They have separated their feelings from the facts and have portrayed the information in the plainest text possible, yet you stick your head in the sand. Vapid retorts of stale talking points and astroturfed ideologies that favor comforting lies over the truth. There is no cure for such viewpoints but time itself.

Only about 10% of the literature from the time predicted global cooling. Don't conflate your feelings with reality.

In case the big graph scared you away from reading the text in that post. Also.. Believe what you want? It's a graph, believing implies there's a leap in the logic there. You could have stuck a thermometer right there in Southington and tracked it up until the present day and found the exact same thing.

Two things can be true at the same time. It certainly can still snow plenty in November and December, but increasing temperatures have made it just a bit more difficult as time goes on.

You expected to find the complete facts from a timespan that runs exclusively from January 1st to February 21st?

Still wondering about this. Why did you criticize the national temperature map for "only including March to August" when you previously posted/backed a map which only included January 1st-February 21st?

The period starting August 1st through now is tied with 2009 for the coolest such period since 2006 at DCA, with an average temperature of 69.7 Degrees. T-6th Coolest in the last 25 years, though it falls to T-17th Coolest in the last 50 years.

Ramped up even more since this message, that utility pole in the distance is really swaying now.

Why not?

this is the question

It’s not a difficult question to answer