Jump to content

ma blizzard

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,873

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by ma blizzard

  1. ma blizzard
    these rates are nuts .. KORH and KBOS are on pace for over 0.5" this hour
  2. ma blizzard
    0.62 in the bucket at PVD the past 2 hours .. impressive
  3. ma blizzard
    gotta love the run to run consistency from the NAM .. looks like it would flip to rain into S NH
  4. ma blizzard
    Agreed, 18z NAM was a solid look but close to something much bigger IMO .. meanwhile the GFS is fish food
  5. ma blizzard
    take 'em down .. turned out to be more like U50s - M60s .. some torchy spots like KBED did get to 70 though
  6. ma blizzard
    all jokes aside .. I do think we'll see widespread 65-70 by mid afternoon
  7. ma blizzard
    we watch 3/24 and potentially 3/25 - 3/26 as well?
  8. ma blizzard
    1 PM KBOS 43 KORH 67
  9. ma blizzard
    meso models have the bdcf reaching NE MA overnight
  10. ma blizzard
    ORH: Big time gradient between BOS / ORH
  11. ma blizzard
    I only referred to the 3km NAM run regarding low level temps overnight. Not w/e it does when it goes crazy with convection tmrw
  12. ma blizzard
    18z NAM 3km shows cold tuck w/ sub 32 degree temps for a lot of E/C MA northwest of 128 overnight something to keep an eye on anyway
  13. ma blizzard
  14. ma blizzard
    nice QPF distribution
  15. ma blizzard
    maybe if you universally add 3-5 degrees everywhere .. We can be sure there will be a cold tuck but TBD what type of T/TD we are advecting in from SE NH / SW ME Thur evening and Night
  16. ma blizzard
    ran straight outa ct blizz's basement: https://vortex.plymouth.edu/WRF/wrf_over_d3_Large.html this model is always entertaining when there is a cold tuck in play
  17. ma blizzard
    the meso low / cad sig looks a little better than the 18z run
  18. ma blizzard
    https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?m=ecmwf_full&p=sfct_b&rh=2020020400&fh=72&r=us_ne&dpdt=&mc=
  19. ma blizzard
  20. ma blizzard
    Seriously .. this is still at D4-D5, its crazy to say anything definitive at this time range.
  21. ma blizzard
    IMO, watching how this interaction plays out will be pivotal
  22. ma blizzard
    In this case I think QPF is misleading .. 500/700 track was really good. If we kept this look, no doubt QPF would increase as we go forward IMO
  23. ma blizzard
    Just for ref when we compare this to 12/92 ..
  24. ma blizzard
    http://mp1.met.psu.edu/~fxg1/NARR/1992/us1211.php
  25. ma blizzard
    the SLP tucking in like that would be fine if it was doing so off ACY .. just can't have the ULL gaining latitude like that
×
×
  • Create New...