CAPE

It's supposed to be a rare thing not to have a 50 50 low when their is a west based -nao....frustrating that this could be another spine runner Here is your puny '50-50' low squirting out into the NA as a ridge builds ahead of the deep upper low. This is how a "block" becomes ineffective.

It's not that simple. This is a big NS vort digging down, and there needs to be some resistance above it to inhibit it from rotating back northward(cutting). Without a vortex under the NAO ridge(a true block), the confluence/convergence is weak and upper heights just build there out in front as the shortwave digs. eta- anecdotal but a -NAO is probably most effective in a Nino with an active southern stream as primary waves are embedded in that, rather than emanating from the northern stream with a NW to SE angle of approach.

Incrementally weaker with the TPV under the block since 6z. Ultimately it ends up more like the Euro.

Through hour 75 GFS looks the same.

However long that video was, that's how much time out of your life you just wasted.

The model disparity in the handling of the TPV underscores the importance of having negative height anomalies underneath the NAO ridge in order for it to act as an effective block, encouraging a favorable storm track underneath. Fill that area in with a ridge and it becomes largely impotent and of little use to achieve the desired outcome.

NBM is useless given the disparity, and the blend probably includes models with low or no skill at this range. Only runs that matter are the next GFS and Euro.

Having a TPV under the block does more than just compress the flow. It spins off spokes of energy that can phase with and sharpen the primary wave in time for a coastal to get going south of our latitude. It actually encourages the wave to amplify/dig more, and take on a negative tilt.

The Euro was doing this a few days ago then trended away from it, but yeah I don't think we want the shortwave to be an entire TPV lobe lol.

Look at the 6z GFS run. I made a post on it earlier.

The runs with the better outcomes have lower heights there yes.

I think this is probably the best panel to see the differences. Continues the trend of ejecting less lead energy eastward underneath the NAO ridge.

In progress.

At this juncture the depiction on the means is reasonably close to what we want, but plenty of details that will determine the ultimate outcome remain unresolved.

A bit of an increased indication of low pressure to the NW on the 6z GEFS.

Pretty epic run. A weak wave with some light snow on Xmas day, and it has the storm on the 27th.

Verbatim it's a big hit along I-95 and east. NW burbs would see several inches.

6z GFS does things with the initial vortex- more symmetrical and turns it under the block instead of it sliding out towards 50-50. A piece of energy rotating down phases with the main shortwave.

2.12" total.

The initial wave sliding east under the NAO ridge towards 50-50 is weaker, and more energy is dumped into the main shortwave- so a stronger shortwave with less resistance above and it doesn't dig as far south. Fairly subtle differences in the wave interactions can make big differences in the outcome.

Somewhere up that way. Near Allentown iirc.

Damn I remember him. That was before we had sub forums. PA dude right?

Once some get a sniff of the good stuff, concern sets in that it can't be real, and rationalization begins.