The complications in the evolution of this event are related to the highly amplified nature of the pattern- mostly the massive EPO ridge in conjunction with the NAO ridge. Some of this at the infancy stage has been discussed, but it is interesting to see the differences later in the process. There are 2 anticyclonic wave breaks that bridge the 2 ridges and influence the TPV that is 'squeezed' out underneath. Throw in the deep Aleutian trough and amplifying PNA ridge..
Notice the TPV being absorbed into the Aleutian trough, and the character of the PNA ridge as it bridges with the NAO ridge on the GEFS. The trough that is our storm is being influenced by the NAO ridge and the vortex underneath. Favorable for the desired outcome.
Look at the EURO ens(CMC similar). PNA ridge bridge with the EPO, and the NW Canada TPV is interacting with the trough(the storm) downstream; the vortex/lower heights under the NAO ridge are largely absent, and the NAO ridge connects to the amped ridge ahead of the trough. Not what we want. The deep trough rotates back north as there is little resistance.
Needless to say these are pretty significant differences at the time the storm is developing.