Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,648
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    SENCMike
    Newest Member
    SENCMike
    Joined

Is we back? February discussion thread


mahk_webstah
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

We may be better off that way in terms of snow....seasonable cold with space for amplification in the absence of Bertha over top.

I agree. I just hope we can hold onto blocking because I despise the Pacific. Blech.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Well I hope your 14-15 redux comes to fruition. 

Did I, or anybody ever say that? Where did that come from. And I’m putting words in your mouth?  This is exactly what I mean…you’re putting those words in my mouth. Who the fuck said that Scott!! Who?  You are one little messed up whining beotch…What a fruitcake.  

  • Haha 1
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said:

PNA was party negative....WPO loses correlation in March, so you must be referring to EPO? I think I'l take. my chances with ridging reasserting there late, regardless of guidance.

I just looked at the composite. The whole AO region was negative with some higher heights in AK and mega blocking.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I mean, I'll take the under on me getting 45.5" again, but it will probably be a decent month.

That was one damaging month. Probably as anomalous as Feb 34 15. But we learned from the past to never say never 

  • Like 2
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I mean, I'll take the under on me getting 45.5" again, but it will probably be a decent month.

I mean we are only 3 days into this snowiest month of the winter…so hopefully we can score some during peak climo.  But ya…if it plays out like those charts, could be decent as you said. Or all that could change by the time we even get into March a month from now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

This whole can’t get over the P7 hump is really freaking annoying. 

 

1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Yes.

Seems like we just need to avoid the MJO from getting in the way during March...don't need it. 2001 flirted with phase 8 briefly, then went COD...2018 was actually briefly in MC before going COD.

AVvXsEhNHDMaMtvUWOzH4T-lPaln_-oNhDg-WzWoAVvXsEhFyYzLT5NU93kub9V7j4pV3OWWTxFL3njj

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Damage In Tolland said:

How can we do that if they’re torching it after V Day though? Honestly ?

 The hope is that we change that look to more blocking. I’d like to see a better NPAC though. Some signs it was trying to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

How can we do that if they’re torching it after V Day though? Honestly ?

A lot gets lost in semantics...technically, that mid January period was a torch because night time mins were very high, even though we didn't get any 55 degree-torch days. I get where both sides are coming from. I don't think that mid February break will stick, like the mid January break...but it won't get as cold as late January early February again, not that we need it to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...