Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,623
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    masonj4
    Newest Member
    masonj4
    Joined

MO/KS/AR/OK 2025-2026 Winter Discussion


stormdragonwx
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, MUWX said:

I am just going to keep telling myself that models no longer matter because these high res models are really under whelming. 

I think 2nd system might save it. 18z NAM is ejecting it out farther west. 18z HRRR was pretty robust as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weather is so strange sometimes. This is IMBY

2.3" of 10:1 on the 18z NAM with first system... On the 12z NAM it was 6.7"

Somehow ended up with 9.3" of 10:1 on 18z NAM with both systems. On the 12z NAM it was 11". 

Not too bad despite "losing" 4.4" with the first system not hitting.

15.5 Kuchera on 18z NAM and 15.4 Kuchera on 12z NAM so gained 0.1 somehow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, RocketWX said:

I'll be very curious to read ICT's afternoon Forecast Discussion and their thoughts on the 2nd system and it's potential impact on this area. 

Update: They already posted it. They definitely call out that the main axis of snowfall has shifted south and east for Saturday night. Now calling for 5-8" for SC KS with Southeast KS approaching 10". Of note 4-6" of that is with the first wave, so they're leaning toward the 2nd wave having minimal impact here. I'll take it, but feels like we'll just miss out on the real fun that south and east of here will get. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TSA seems to be jumping on what the GFS is saying too. They upped the totals in the WSW text to 8-14" with local 18" totals. Blowing and drifting snow also expected. Wonder if they will issue Blizzard Warnings? My area has never had one. https://forecast.weather.gov/wwamap/wwatxtget.php?cwa=TSA&wwa=winter storm warning

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, stormdragonwx said:

TSA seems to be jumping on what the GFS is saying too. They upped the totals in the WSW text to 8-14" with local 18" totals. Blowing and drifting snow also expected. Wonder if they will issue Blizzard Warnings? My area has never had one. https://forecast.weather.gov/wwamap/wwatxtget.php?cwa=TSA&wwa=winter storm warning

I dont think this storm will bring strong enough sustained winds to see blizzard warnings, but could see some blizzardlike conditions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is reminding me of that system a couple years ago. Looks like the air is struggling to saturate now. Snow is very fine and light and is blowing around so it's hard to measure. Totals haven't increased much. If the 2nd wave also underperforms later tonight this might be a bust. I will be very surprised if we see 10+ inches in my area like what was being forcasted.

EDIT: Based on current totals and the time frame on the models, it looks like the 10:1 ratio totals may be closer to reality. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The unreliability of the models is incredible for being the day of. They were all incredibly consistent all week up til a few hours ago saying this system is gonna dump on us with a forceful 1+2 punch. HRRR in particular has cut the totals in half in just 6 hours time.

Good ol Lucy with the football as I feared.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yikes.... all Mets here in Tulsa are already screaming they were wrong about the first round due to some very dry air from winds out of the northeast basically eating away at the snow that was falling. We have a few inches now and possibly 4-8 later, but the "historic" label was probably overdone for this storm.:shiver:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ouamber said:

Yikes.... all Mets here in Tulsa are already screaming they were wrong about the first round due to some very dry air from winds out of the northeast basically eating away at the snow that was falling. We have a few inches now and possibly 4-8 later, but the "historic" label was probably overdone for this storm.:shiver:

I thought it became pretty apparent yesterday that this wasn’t going to be historic, at least up here. The models pretty much universally caved by 12z yesterday. I still have some hope for round 2, but there’s pretty much no chance we break the 10” mark. Round 1 wasn’t my biggest snow of the year, which was impossible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sitting about 2" in south tulsa, I think its going to take a significant overperformance in round 2 to get us to the double digit mark but the radar over sw oklahoma and texas is certainly more impressive than what the HRRR has modeled so I have hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, schoeppeya said:

Sitting about 2" in south tulsa, I think its going to take a significant overperformance in round 2 to get us to the double digit mark but the radar over sw oklahoma and texas is certainly more impressive than what the HRRR has modeled so I have hope.

The HRRR is pretty impressive for the next 36 hrs so there's still a chance we get close to double digits. The dry air robbed us some last night, but still picked up 2" here in far NW AR. This won't be a top 10 snow but will be a very nice one when all is said and done. Probably get us to our seasonal average here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mesoscale Discussion 0044
NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman OK
1034 AM CST Sat Jan 24 2026

Areas affected...Portions of West Texas into central Oklahoma

Concerning...Winter mixed precipitation

Valid 241634Z - 242030Z

SUMMARY...An expanding area of mostly sleet will continue northeast through the afternoon.

DISCUSSION...An area of showery precipitation continues to expand from West Texas into southwest Oklahoma this morning. The precipitation coverage is already more expansive than shown by any 12Z guidance and it continues to expand. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, The Waterboy said:

Mesoscale Discussion 0044
NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman OK
1034 AM CST Sat Jan 24 2026

Areas affected...Portions of West Texas into central Oklahoma

Concerning...Winter mixed precipitation

Valid 241634Z - 242030Z

SUMMARY...An expanding area of mostly sleet will continue northeast through the afternoon.

DISCUSSION...An area of showery precipitation continues to expand from West Texas into southwest Oklahoma this morning. The precipitation coverage is already more expansive than shown by any 12Z guidance and it continues to expand. 

Thats the precip area I was referencing, pretty impressive on radar

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, The Waterboy said:

Mesoscale Discussion 0044
NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman OK
1034 AM CST Sat Jan 24 2026

Areas affected...Portions of West Texas into central Oklahoma

Concerning...Winter mixed precipitation

Valid 241634Z - 242030Z

SUMMARY...An expanding area of mostly sleet will continue northeast through the afternoon.

DISCUSSION...An area of showery precipitation continues to expand from West Texas into southwest Oklahoma this morning. The precipitation coverage is already more expansive than shown by any 12Z guidance and it continues to expand. 

Hopefully an overachieving performance yet to come 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, JoMo said:

That second band has a lot of work to do to reach the 6" mark for a lot of the Springfield CWA. I have doubts. 

Just a really bad forecast from SGF and most local Mets, it appears. Too early to call it a bust but SGF has reduced their expected totals in not insignificant way already. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MUWX said:

Just a really bad forecast from SGF and most local Mets, it appears. Too early to call it a bust but SGF has reduced their expected totals in not insignificant way already. 

Really bad modeling by pretty much all the models. They were definitely producing too much QPF. I still think there's a 25%-75% chance they verify though! Ah probability forecasting, can't be wrong!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, JoMo said:

Really bad modeling by pretty much all the models. They were definitely producing too much QPF. I still think there's a 25%-75% chance they verify though! Ah probability forecasting, can't be wrong!

Mets do seem way too reliant on models, its really frustrating.  SGF has dropped me from an expected storm total of 14" to an expected total of 9". They missed last night badly. They put out a graphic that showed 2-5" up here and 2-6" area wide, I woke up to .5" on my back deck and I think half of that had blown off my roof. They just weren't even remotely close on that initial round. Models look pretty good for round 2, but we are going to need some good ratios to do anything impressive, unfortunately, when you are dealing with high ratios a little change in QPF makes huge changes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...