Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,511
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Toothache
    Newest Member
    Toothache
    Joined

Let's talk Winter!


Steve

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

If you look at the last three main runs on the GFS-- 12z, 00z, 12z (today)-- it's worked it's way NW to be pretty much in line with what the others have shown-- big hit for N. Central KY thru Southern Ohio.... the question is does it come up to where the NAM and the Euro have trended...if I recall correctly, the latest Canadian (mid afternoon today) was the outlier with a very suppressed solution to the south. Right now it appears we have relatively good agreement, which is obviously all subject to change. 

 

Honestly, I am ready to move on....one of my kids has a soccer tourney and lacrosse game scheduled (on turf) and anything close to what is being progged is going to put those games in serious doubt....though I suppose with a plow and some warmth on Friday...they could get it in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well. Unless this run is just a total outlier turkey... I don't think ILN can avoid bringing the WSW up to Dayton and perhaps as far north as Union County.

 

I think you need some more models to back it.   The euro doesn't bring warning criteria snows that far north.   But I think a watch to say Fayette county probably makes total sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

06z nam will tell the tale.... it will either show Ohio getting crushed with 2-3' or it starts heading south...  :lol:

 

I have no problem buying this. I mean.. Not down to the detail. But its not THAT much different than the 12Z ECMWF. factor in usual bias. its not unreasonable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you look at the last three main runs on the GFS-- 12z, 00z, 12z (today)-- it's worked it's way NW to be pretty much in line with what the others have shown-- big hit for N. Central KY thru Southern Ohio.... the question is does it come up to where the NAM and the Euro have trended...if I recall correctly, the latest Canadian (mid afternoon today) was the outlier with a very suppressed solution to the south. Right now it appears we have relatively good agreement, which is obviously all subject to change. 

 

Honestly, I am ready to move on....one of my kids has a soccer tourney and lacrosse game scheduled (on turf) and anything close to what is being progged is going to put those games in serious doubt....though I suppose with a plow and some warmth on Friday...they could get it in.

 

The ggem wasn't south of most guidance, in fact the swath of snow was arguably further north than the euro.  The issue with the ggem was it was really dry.  Widespread 3-5" all the way up to and north of CMH.  But the heaviest snow was only topping 8" across the Ohio river valley.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no problem buying this. I mean.. Not down to the detail. But its not THAT much different than the 12Z ECMWF. factor in usual bias. its not unreasonable.

 

I agree there's a chance.   When the nam pulls this furthest north and wettest scenario stuff, it's either leading the way to a coupe of falling flat on it's face.    It is still way north of the euro with generous snowfall.  Euro pretty much cuts off right around i-70 with 3" amounts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we need one of the big boys to show a shift north tonight....if not it probably means the nam's solution for us folks further north ain't happening.

 

From a SE Ohio perspective. the GFS is a step better than it was. I tend to agree with the ILN AFD though.. it shows cold air crashing in way too fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still troubling the GFS isn't playing ball.

NAM is by itself. The EURO would give us roughly 3-4" with cmh around 1-2" but 50 miles south of us nears a foot.

NAM gives us 8-12".

GFS 1-3"

CMC 4-6"

UKIE I'm not sure. I'd say 4-6

SREF has a mean of 6.7 with a low of 0 and high of 17"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NAM is by itself. The EURO would give us roughly 3-4" with cmh around 1-2" but 50 miles south of us nears a foot.

NAM gives us 8-12".

GFS 1-3"

CMC 4-6"

UKIE I'm not sure. I'd say 4-6"

Interesting spread in the models considering how close we are to the event, which probably indicates how tricky this set up is going to be. Of note, blending the two outliers (NAM and the GFS) gets you the ukie and CMC totals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...