I’ve never understood the argument on this board.
First, there is nothing any of us can do about the track/severity of a cane, blizzard, tornado, etc., other than mitigate the risk by providing lead time to the public. Is it in poor taste to root for a derecho, or tor, or crippling blizzard/cold snap/heat wave? Probably, because in dangerous situations bad things happen to people irrespective of whether it’s their fault or not, but wx doesn’t care about my emotions or desires. Never has, never will.
Second, a lot of the violent wx we see is the atmosphere doing what it’s designed to do—seek balance. Fascination with and the desire to observe the power of wx shouldn’t be confused with glee of the impact on people and communities. The science is often brought forward by people who are in awe of the power but are humbled by the impact. To me, that’s morally neutral.
Third—if there is a moral hierarchy of what can be liked, where’s the line? Is there anything in wx that’s 100% safe?
I’ve always felt that like other things in life, you take wx as it comes, whatever that may be. I have zero interest in a tree falling on my new house, or my wife spinning off the road in a January warning level event—two things that could very well happen someday. But that’s not because of my fascination with tropical or snow.