Typhoon Tip

It was ... but the point was that it hasn't deviated. I hunch that it'll be the same at 12z today - but we'll see. I don't particularly trust that guidance source ( lol ). It is what it is. I really just posted that as a tongue-in-cheeker.

Few pages behind in this thing, but I like the GGEM's blocking influence, during -AO and/or -NAOs, more so than the GFS Euro (for positioning aspects in space) and always have. Maybe it's something to do with that index being more important/urgent in every day means up there, but just anecdotally they seem to do well with that aspect. A blend in the ens means may be more useful. I haven't looked at jack squat since very early yesterday morning and that was a just a cursory pass thru. Fwiw, yesterday's Euro and GGEM solutions from 00z ( now 36 hrs old) vs last night's, other than essentially meaningless differences were remarkably similar. This looks like to historic storm on Jan 31st, but since it is March 31, we are getting some geriatric diminishing returns due to seasonal aspects that cannot be avoided. Again, this system is unique relative to anything we've seen this last season. It is anchored by the index rate of change, which is why it is moving so slow. It's driven by sub-PNA --> +PNA with a well timed NE Pac S/W diving in. This latter wave space gets caught underneath a very potent albeit -NAO burst over the western limb of the domain space. That is dense statistical correlation for just carving over the Del Marva ...yet the GFS once this over Worcester. Anyway, the wholesale event is some 30 hrs in some of these model because it is straight up index driven event... Unfortunate that it is happening on March 31 and now January 31. Shave 3 deg for winter climate off that thermal plumb and this thing would easily be a top 10 event. Not only would the ptypes be settled, but the more intense baroclinic axis throughout the entire domain would positively feed-back in consolidation and higher storm productivity results from that. So a few realistic aspect that cannot be avoided in this from what I am looking at. The JMA has never deviated from a blockbuster blue bomb, btw. If for cartoon value alone, this is a pretty ominous look

It’s a coarse model that probably isn’t very good… but the JMA’s 12z took 24 hrs to get to this arrangement below, a time span in which everyone remains below 0C at 850mb the whole way

It really is remarkable how quickly at least in the operational GFS, is transitive … Tries to go from the substantial snowstorm in New England all the way to the mid 70s just three or four days later.

Lol dont play with my junk … I meant that as a headline like, “severe thunderstorm watch” fwiw

This ending up more central NE and N is also on the table. Duh... but just pointing out that NYC/CT and RI peeps need to be aware of this in the evolving totality of it

Brooklyn' or Drag perhaps consider a thread for this for early awareness. pushing -3 ( perhaps - 4! ) SD anomaly ... trending under Long Island in recent guidance; this is historic/inference quite significant, and here there is enough cold. Primarily this is an interior CT and points NE emerging threat, but the wholesale manifold of synoptic metrics are not excluding this reaching back SW as a major blue snow player, either. Super synoptic considerations have shown remarkable continuity ( -NAO over the western limb) with apparent highly coupled trough. These REX couplets tend to operate within themselves and often disconnected from the telecon tapestry of the surrounding hemisphere where they set up this coherently.

I made this same comparison over another system a week ago ... ha! thing is, most spring events probably carry this kind of genetic likeness in the 500 mb pieces. But this is multi metrical/layering. You can really make out how the shortened wave lengths are working in conjunction with the cold anomaly situated GL-NE over top and how all that creates these rare late deals. Folks should bear in mind that whatever has happened between October 2023 and March 2024 bears 0 indicator significance for what's being set up by the model. It's particular type of exclusive seasonal predicament that causes these that is unique to the spring season.

Yup

On that run/model? yeah... Haven't seen anything but a glance at the GFS which appeared at to at least not argue. I noticed that the 500 mb in the leading time intervals on this GGEM run ends up some 3 deg latitude deeper along the M/A, before the cyclogenesis dynamic feedback repositions the whole structure to what amounts to the idealized position/climate reference for absolute maximization. Yikes. Very deep while at that location, too. Cold is is NOT in short supply, either ... as I heavily demonstrated in the thread opener, there is a big sprawling cold lower tropospheric anomaly in situ, prior to all this unfolding. Considering the seasonal warming signals is still alive and well S of NJ... that sets the domain table with am acutely explosive potential. That's probably why we're seeing some upper 960s mb low results coming out ( 00z Euro and this ICON ..etc) This goes form a significant season ending/blue bomb snow, to a historic suggestion should this continue - won't pull that trigger yet at this range ahead. But I will caution, big events in history almost always have an usually long lead with more coherent than normal actualized charting. I'd say this system has a lot of upshot potential in general though. It has a ceiling that is very high. It's anchored by the index mode rate of change, which is also in constructive interference with the wave mechanical movement through the field - we've observed good index signaling in the past but the flow itself being so fast detracts from realized physics. The models have gone and set up a big one here at the time of the year when the speed of the flow is stepping off the accelerator - that means the physics can be tapped. So we'll see

Yeah...these individual runs are producing some love at first sight eye babe solutions .. that GGEM is a ceiling storm

Fwiw - the CCB has been trending S though the last three cycles. It's hard to quantitatively assess that because the system is really sort of two events in a 'contact binary' The other models show a lead wave triggering steady cat paw if not wet snows for 9 or so hour prior to the hog balls mid level amplitude then spinning up a main low. That lead 9 or so hours is a coin toss because of a marginal thermal layout. The GGEM and operational Euro (standard) are cold enough at 850 mb through the lead, and the 2nd more potent near bombogen deepening rates underneath is no question we all flash to snow. The AI version is sort of blurring the distinction of the two pulse scenario by just having a weird CCB that presses S with limited associated 2nd cyclone depth associated, underneath. Busted ravioli low with CCB over top is a red flag for piece of shit model handling - something more significant is liable to be there

It'll be interesting to see how fast 15-20" of blue bomb high h20 content snow disappears. As persistent as this signal has become in recent days ... so too is the handsome mild to warm signal for the 7-10th of the month. But obviously ... long range blah blah not withstanding. The Euro and GFS both implicate a middling to major snow potential, followed by a real shot at 70 F by the afternoon of the Eclipse.

Significant Miller B Nor'easter potential is signaled across Apr 3rd-4th ... A chilly 850 mb anomaly is in position over SE Canada ...infiltrated throughout the eastern GL and NE England regions, prior to a strong -NAO maxing over the western limb of the domain. This aspect is situated while there is an undercutting trough of significant amplitude. Any kind of emergent trough is highly statistically correlated with this particular kind of -NAO expression, but below we see what really amounts to a phenomenally exquisite expression of that. Given to the high correlation, notwithstanding the "stable look" to this synoptic evolution ... confidence is quite high for at least the general set up. Anomalously high baroclinic instability in situ despite the lateness of the date/spring season. As the above mid and upper level events unfold over top that lower level temperature gradient ( see the 850 mb charts from the operational Euro/GFS/GGEM further above) ... strong cyclogenesis is well within the realm of possibilities, and the only limitation on this as far as I can see given these rather elegantly, yet glaringly obvious precursor metrics is the fact that this above is about 144 to 156 hours away. Unfortunately ... confidence is only very high for an event. What that event's particulars will mean as far as specific impacts is still pending. But sufficed it is to say ...this is a classic leading layout for late season snow impact. What is also interesting about this - from a personal anecdotal/experience perspective, these spring storms tend to actually be modeled more marginal/warmer than this, at this sort of time range - only to tick colder as the time nears to a 'blue timber bender' storm. This already has the look from all sources, and has been a recurrent theme over the past week. Dynamic height falls and just wholesale evolution of common winter metrics that are involved, snow would be a slam dunk. It's worth it to follow this ...lest the new April thread has a 100 pages by the 5th of the month... I also am aware that interest in winter -related subject matter may be diminishing at this point. Seasonal awareness, along with just issue fatigue for having been abused so mercilessly over the last 4 months ( LOL )... but it is what it. It is noted that the 00z Euro CCB's the hell out of interior and eastern SNE out of this ordeal. It is also something that we haven't seen much of in recent years, a slower moving event.

Racked up another positive temperature day despite feeling miserably cold and gloomy ... this is how we contribute to CC here.

12z Euro's another flooder ...but does bring goodies to the winter hold-out types from Brian-like and points N. Also has the balmy bubble air mass formulating after that from 7th on spanning SE Canada/NE and the OV, too.

yeah... April ... particularly early April is just perfectly when that is most likely to occur around here. I'm not sure what your history is, but do you remember the 1997 "April Fool's Day storm" ? It was sunny, 64 F at 1:15 pm up at the UML weather lab, while the 12z model runs were coming in with a 4 contoured hornet stinger 500 mb closed low and attending sfc bomb just S of Cape Cod scheduled for 2 days later. The campus was abuzz with that type of passionate fever as though the prison gates were opened and the world was set free. The energy and joy was palpable on that Saturday, mid day. Monday we changed to snow, and that night 9 consecutive hours of S+ with occasional lightning all quadrants was on the Logan Metar. My buddy lived in Wayland, MA ( about 20 mi due W of Boston along Rt 20). He was describing the breath arresting wide-eye pause that overwhelmed him as he swung open the door to see that the 0" of snow on ground the previous evening was now 31" ...tenting over the cars to the point where they were completely and totally encased. This is the more typical society guy. Doesn't really concern for weather forecast, except here or there when it necessarily matters to him. Not like us in here that track cumulus clouds ( haha). So I don't even think he knew there was a winter storm warning in place - or if so, only tacitly aware of it. But then again, LOL, I don't think NWS was much better considering what happened. By the following Saturday, it was 60 degrees.

You know what ... it's not out the question that we end up with a snow pack than 2 days later hover 70 F over top. With mud gully rivers flowing out of it, of course. I have seen it be 70 F with snow still on the ground due to an March or April sudden switch. Firstly, sell 20+" for now. But a 4-6" late season urinal blue cookie snow aching to melt when the storm's pulling out, knowing the next day the forecast is 59 F because even though the profiles allow for 72, no one has the ballz to forecast that over a snow pack.... that's always an fun bun for me.

But yeah...that warming look was even more impressive in the 00z run. How far and wide/long a any warm up in the range ultimately is...the entire continent below the 50th is in general seasonally flushing out the cold. It's like - symbolically - this coastal on the 3-6th is the spring exit event. Thickness gradients relax right after and with much more shallow cool loads that are easier modulated by the powerful April sun.

'cept laying down a bd boundary that close by is going to see that bd down to cape may nj

Well sure... but I was just speaking to that chart/interval, specifically. It maybe too warm. ... like I said, the GGEM tends to be too warm in the bl in that mid range stuff. I think it's overall an impressive homage to potential that it's as blue painted in ptype as much as it is at this range. That -NAO over the western limb in the multi-model blend has been hugely consistent for days now - it's like all but definitely going to happen. And it argues that anything delivered out of the NE Pac WILL descend in latitude underneath - the telecon on the shipping route is centered over the Mid Atlantic... The question - for me - is whether that result would bias on the N or S side of the general statistical domain. Because the entrance intervals ( time ) just prior shows heights in positive anomaly, albeit modestly so, over the lower Tenn Valley and adjacent Gulf o/ Mex/Florida and off the SE coast. That's a "Miami Rule" no-no... Some of the wave mechanics in the descent will get absorbed when the flow compresses down there, and is forced to speed up velocity. That's probably why we are seeing these solution - at present - that take the closing mid level centers straight over SNE instead of the idealized S of LI track like those biggies of yore and song. The feed-back process end up more N where more of the wave mechanics are less neg interfered.

That's like snowing really hard with nothing sticking ... not below 1200 or so... I think though that the GGEM having a warm bl bias in this time range above, 'might' make that interesting with the perfunctory correction.

Told ya .... https://phys.org/news/2024-03-extratropical-ocean-atmosphere-interactions-contribute.html ...15 years ago

oH man ... I hope that 00z GFS is right about the 7th - 10th ... madly deserved. 552 + dm hydrostats everywhere S of 50 N for three days of sun working on the landscape. The funny thing is, the 6th has the last of the -NAO driven coastal system still whirling in 38 F cat paws, and two days later it may be in the upper 60s or even 70 given that synopsis. Plus it has the upshot of less impeded eclipse viewing. It'd be nice but can't be confident about that unfortunately at this range.

Actually to be fair and honest, I noticed looking out the kitchen window when waiting on the tea kettle this morning that the lawn suddenly has green patches that were not there last week. I don't qualify it as "growing" just yet, but the uniform beige is now more a patchwork of vaguely greener and dormancy. I don't think that is early in and of itself. My recollection is that grass will tinge green at lesser environmental excuse - few mild days in February passing out the solar nadir into Ray's favorite - warm bum car seat season - and that patchwork look will flash over fields. That seems more like where we are at here in the Nashoba Valley. Which is interesting ...because what part of an icing event just last week flicked the turn green trigger ?