Jump to content

mitchnick

Members
  • Posts

    26,232
  • Joined

Everything posted by mitchnick

  1. Thanks for nothing brooklynwx99 https://twitter.com/WorldClimateSvc/status/1708214486182592584?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1708214486182592584|twgr^9c9fdd3118dd5a77ef8eb4cc830ccd7e29dee6ca|twcon^s1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanwx.com%2Fbb%2Findex.php%3Fapp%3Dcoremodule%3Dsystemcontroller%3Dembedurl%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FWorldClimateSvc%2Fstatus%2F1708214486182592584
  2. Waiting for @brooklynwx99 to post the updated Cansips...and they better be good d@mnit!
  3. Sadly, those days are long gone down there. I predict a tough rental season at OBX next year compared to 22 and 23. Otoh, it's not so bad if you can get a group of families into 1 house, but it's usually been my bright idea to go so I get stuck. Lol No more!
  4. We went to Nags Head last month, which is our usual spot. But frankly, we took it off the list. They don't clean the houses anymore except for a cursory wipe down...no workers. Nice house and location, but $4800 for a week and all you get is a dirty house that smelled like somebody else's last night dinner was a let down. And when you leave, they give you first shot at renting the same week next year. Unfortunately, the price jumped to $6200/week!!! Apparently, this year didn't reflect higher mortgage rates and most of those places down there have adjustable mortgages. Honestly, good luck to them but I am not paying that much even if the place was perfect. Other houses I checked went up proportionately just as much.
  5. Ahh, makes sense. I haven't been to OC since 2015 I believe. I have a law school buddy that lives in Salisbury, so we usually will visit he and his wife when were in OC. But since we got the place here, there was Covid and then a cluster of things that have kept us from traveling much, not that I like to travel. Pretty content not going anywhere actually. Lol
  6. On the 1 hand that is surprising, but on the other it still is MD and they were pretty gung-ho with restrictions during rounds 1 and 2.
  7. Hopefully it comes and goes fast. Good news is you should be in good shape into next year as it takes a while for the new strains to develop. Take care.
  8. I'm sorry, but none of us knows with certainty who in this world does or does not have a bias or dog in the fight. Just sayin'.
  9. I heard no because of new strain(s), but that came from the people who make $ on them.
  10. Man I wish we could just lose the climate change discussions. There's a forum for it, and this one ain't it. But 1 prediction I'll make on the subject is that no opinions will change with further discussions.
  11. Here's an example of the problem with these publications. You don't know if you're getting the FULL story. Like I said, everybody in journalism has an agenda and "scientists" are on the take too. Not all of them, but nobody knows who is and who isn't. And you don't have to read the entire article, just what the Hopkins earth and climate scientist said to get the point. https://www.foxnews.com/us/california-scientist-left-out-full-truth-climate-change-wildfire-study-published
  12. It's OK to believe these Gfs temps. I'm telling ya', I'm feeling this.
  13. Like I posted earlier today I believe, none of the models showed this dip in 3.4 for with their September updates only 4 weeks ago. If you go back to the Cfs site linked below, it started to reflect a dip around the 8th of the month. It now has the dip and then a rebound, but only to a peak in December of around +1.75C on its monthly forecast and between +1.6-1.7 on the seasonal forecast. So if the Cfs has a better handle on things, it won't make super. Of course, the other models don't update daily like the Cfs so we'll never know if they would have seen the dip. Your favorite model apparently thinking it's forecasting for the planet Mercury, the BOM, missed it completely...even on its 9/23 forecast! https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/CFSv2/CFSv2_body.html
  14. I will say nothing further on this issue beyond this post because I doubt I will come across as anything other than acidic. But i don't believe we can believe any article written by either side unless it has been peer reviewed and commented on by both sides of the issue. Everybody receiving a paycheck in journalism has an agenda and everbody else has an opinion they want to push. I equate these kinds of articles as using a forecast to verify a future forecast period. One last thing. I'm in my 60's and was already a weenie in the 70's, and there WAS a lot of news on the issue of the climate going colder. In fact, I do remember seeing a Time cover story suggesting climate was turning colder. I'm done.
  15. We (me) got nada from Nemo. Another painful miss in my weenie winterless world that year. But thanks for reminding me. lol
  16. I don't believe any of the models in their September updates predicted this drop. How anyone thinks he/she/models can accurately predict ONI numbers, and sound so confident about it, is laughable. Yet, we've all seen the tweets/posts.
  17. There's a known problem with the Gfs surface temps that Ncep is working on from what I've heard. So it's hard to say when its surface forcasts of way AN temps is from its bias or legit. But if the Canadian has it, I buy the threat.
  18. I posted this yesterday. Waters around Japan cooling rapidly as of 9/25, so no reason to worry about that yet imho.
  19. You're not getting super with that steady erosion of subsurface + anomalies. Something needs to change to stop the cooling and rebuild them. And I mean actually change, not progged to change.
×
×
  • Create New...