Jump to content

WEATHER53

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    8,032

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by WEATHER53

  1. WEATHER53
    The vodka cold is what I remember
  2. WEATHER53
    You guys are as old now as I was back then
  3. WEATHER53
    So this would be long duration light snow with 850s -10C . Just .05ph is 0.8 after 16 hours
  4. WEATHER53
    I count 11 out of 50 that hit us good and last night I think it was 15 so still there for us
  5. WEATHER53
    It can be good for cold air but always seems our low gets scooted east. Is that because of the counter clockwise flow around the Hudson Bay Area?
  6. WEATHER53
    You can always bite me and/or use the ignore feature. It takes a maturity level that you lack to not lash out if your model babies get called ugly i dont believe I ever directed anything directly to you so your attack at me is immature and inappropriate. Also you are foolishly arrogant to pose as some sort of board spokesman . The ignore feature is yours. I will have no need to speak to you again. Models suck at predicting snow for around here. If you can’t deal with that then keep it to yourself.
  7. WEATHER53
    Yes they do hit cold outbreaks very well. With storms the amount of “ingredients” is just too tough to decipher.
  8. WEATHER53
    Monster low near Hudson mostly does not work
  9. WEATHER53
    How can anything that is “scientific” jump around like this?
  10. WEATHER53
    Is that around 20F at 850s?
  11. WEATHER53
    Long duration event of 18+ hours is what we do well, If temps cold snd/or dark then 0.25 up to .0.5”ph would impress.
  12. WEATHER53
    Merit but maybe not as exampled .’I would like 12” in 28 hours more than 20” in 16.
  13. WEATHER53
    Hall of Fame material there
  14. WEATHER53
    Honestly one part of Snowmaggedon was a long steady 0.5ph and then that spectacular early day blizzard like and then ending. Thought 16 was long duration also. ?
  15. WEATHER53
    Steady light to moderate 24 hour events seem to be the better ones for us last 15 years than intense quicker hitter
  16. WEATHER53
    I’m going to stop doing this. I know what I see from models and won’t be told different. Rather right now ride the wave of good potentiality
  17. WEATHER53
    I just looked at a model pack with 70 differing solutions for DC. From 0 to 15”. That’s A Lot of Examples. How many more would you need to call it “every possible outcome” ??
  18. WEATHER53
    Yes and ifs are useless but if that low could have moved in Friday at 10am then I think that air mass at that time would have snowed us
  19. WEATHER53
    15 out of 70 a huge hit for DC. isn’t that higher than usually seen?
  20. WEATHER53
    We are a right smart candy ass now vs our school years.
  21. WEATHER53
    In the early 2000’s I was losing power for 24 hours about every other year. Snow or wind did it. About 5 times in a 10 year run. They came through around 2012 and I have not lost power for more than 3 hours and that one a guy flew a plane into wires.
  22. WEATHER53
    Isabel and the storm thst created OC and this dumb bulb is dismissing as non exceptional and referenced incorrect wind direction
  23. WEATHER53
    Well at least a lot of Lows are being fired at Our target
  24. WEATHER53
    Pepco extreme tree trimming did wonders.
  25. WEATHER53
    This was the depiction for the early Jan event about 4/5?days before we got rain and 50. I hit really excited about an A but turned out further north and west, stronger with excellent cold air scooting out in 24 hours and thus temps over 20 degrees warmer.
×
×
  • Create New...