Jump to content

Terpeast

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    5,369
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Terpeast

  1. Thinking they’re overly bullish. But if I mentally adjust those projections by -0.5, we’re still looking at a 1.5 nino3.4 with 1.0 nino1.2. I would like that to verify, tbh.
  2. I was going to point out a pdo reversal after cpc’s monday enso report. But you summed it up. Selfishly, we want a positive pdo, but it could be disastrous for NW canada.
  3. A moderate 1.3-1.6 nino would be good for the mid atlantic, much better than a strong/super. The pdo will have something to say about it though.
  4. Nice work, @40/70 Benchmark I enjoy reading your posts. This was a tough one to forecast because it falls on the extreme end of the climate spectrum. Who would have guessed that JF would see +8 temps while California gets buried as record snows effectively erased their decades-long drought? Raindance did a good job, but even he didn’t forecast these extremes. Doug K down here in DCA only gave us 2-6” of snow in his outlook, and even he was too generous with that. Sure, the nina and +qbo, IOD, maritime forcing, etc. Were all unfavorable, but if you told me last October how this winter would transpire, I would have thought you were nuts.
  5. Did BBQ on the new grill for Mother’s Day. Perfect day today. Low humidity with a gentle breeze. Can’t ask for better than this. This won’t last long before the humidity comes in.
  6. Yeah, we’ll know better where this is going to go in another month or two. I think I saw somewhere that a WWB is coming later this month into early June, so we’ll see if that makes it over the dateline. That being said, I don’t think the stronger end of the forecasts are going to work out. I see it peaking at moderate or low end strong. 1.4 give or take
  7. Good to see this, thanks. So it IS possible for the PDO to rise by 2 or 3 in a short time span (a year or less). 8% seems a low probability, but it certainly wouldn't surprise me to see the PDO get close to neutral. Based on our east coast snowstorm history, we don't really need a strong +PDO for it to happen. We just need to mute the unfavorable mid-latitude pac forcing to allow the enso to couple.
  8. So do I. That’s why I’m hoping the -pdo will become less negative or closer to neutral.
  9. Exactly. Because the pdo is so negative now, I think it will stay negative for a while. Just less so.
  10. Best case is the pdo returns to neutral, which opens up some favorable possibilities for next winter. Don’t see it going positive so soon after record negative
  11. I had us at near to slightly above normal with a torchy Feb, but less snowy overall. Still busted pretty badly, but there was never an expectation of even a near normal winter in terms of snowfall. Next year, on the other hand...
  12. Remarkably consistent since 2016. At some point, that pattern has gotta break. Like 40/70 said, something's gotta give.
  13. How would you adjust past analogs toward today's climate? Some options come to top of mind: - brute force of adjusting temps up by a couple degrees across the board (oversimplistic, but can be complicated by the fact that doing so would eliminate 32-33 degree snowstorms we had in the past, esp in the MA) - adjusting storm tracks northward. Example: 72-73 had that big storm and much above normal snowfall across the SE US, but virtually nothing from DC to NYC. What if a 72-73 happened today? Would that storm have traversed further north and resulted in a DC-NYC hit? - match every winter from 2000 to today with the best pre-1980 analog, and compare the forcing (location and intensity), and note the changes as a result of a warmer state?
  14. Had you hid the years so I don’t see 72-73 or 97-98, I’d take those maps and run to the bank!
  15. Pretty sure its because those maps don’t have the resolution to convey such limited areas like lake effect snow belts.
  16. I want to! But I’d prefer a solution that’s… uh… less messy.
  17. Anyone know what I can use as a good squirrel repellent for my deck plants? Those little bastards keep pulling them out or tipping my pots over. I tried sprinkling ground pepper in and around the plants, but it seems the rain washed that away.
  18. 65-66 had a neutral pdo leading into that winter so I didn’t mention it. It produced a prolific EC blizzard though
  19. This has never happened at these pdo levels. Closest is 72-73 when the pdo fell to -2 before that nino developed. It rose to neutral/weak negative by winter
  20. We’ll have to see how that plays out in a PDO that is currently negative 3! by comparison, pdo was moderate-strong positive in 1997, and neutral-weak negative in 1982
  21. 44 for the low in ashburn, didn’t get into the 30s like MD
  22. I think we can call 97-98 an outlier at this point. I’m skeptical of us getting to a super nino. I like your blend, though… a 1.5 nino3.4 peak makes logical sense unless the -pdo flips on a dime (unlikely).
×
×
  • Create New...