Jump to content

SnoSki14

Members
  • Posts

    15,184
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SnoSki14

  1. 2nd half of March will deliver in SNE. NAO response + rapidly shortening wavelengths equal snow potential. There's already hints of this in the LR OP runs.
  2. It is good that the west coast is benefiting from all this, they really needed it. Incredibly drought conditions could be reduced to nil in California when all is said and done which would've been unthinkable a few months ago. The downside is the growing drought in the plains, which is not good given that's our crop growth zone. We need big improvement there
  3. A couple more ticks north and 70s get into NYC for Thursday. Could be a wild temperature swing
  4. Where's Brooklyn to tell us how good the GEFS looks
  5. The only time the RNA won't be as damaging is by 2nd half of March due to wavelengths but by then you're fighting climo big time. Which is why I think it'll just be a chilly March 15 till early/mid April. NAO could stick around for a while so hopes of a warm early spring are very unlikely
  6. What a fun rollercoaster that would be. 30s on Wednesday to low 70s Thursday and back to the 20s on Friday.
  7. I think we're too far south to benefit. SNE could do well. Unfortunately I see us getting stuck between the very warm, sunny pattern (60s & 70s) and the cold, wintry one further north. So a lot of dreary 40s & 50s. The GFS has a very early spring backdoor looking pattern for us with a nasty cold tuck. That would only worsen under a -NAO blocking pattern. The 12z GFS is a perfect illustration of what I mean.
  8. The "blocking" shown on the EPS for March may only get us to near normal which by March is too warm for snow. I'm 50/50 percent sure we won't get any more snow this season
  9. Except we're still barely BN as cold anomalies remain west. Additionally all it takes is a stronger -PNA to pump the SE ridge and we stay AN. I do think this will lead to a cold 2nd half of March into April as wavelengths shortern but by then it'll likely be too late for anything meaningful
  10. Yes things have warmed considerably since then. Looks like an east based -NAO too with a neutral PNA. Still a better analog than 2018 though
  11. Do you have a composite map of March 1956
  12. Yes but you can see higher heights over Alaska and western Canada in March 2018 If you're just relying on the -NAO then that could easily link with the SE ridge under a strong RNA pattern. This is not a 2018 look. SE ridge would likely correct stronger. At best you can get a gradient pattern.
  13. Yes that really keeps heights low in the 50/50 zone and staves off the southern ridge
  14. GEFS show that as long as there isn't a ludicrously deep trough out west that things wouldn't be so bad after the 24th
  15. It fits the crappy pattern we've been in. Hell of a pattern out west though. CFS weeklies and monthly for March says winter is done.
  16. We're going to blow past the other seasons. This year has been maximized to be really bad and this was with an "average" December too. Imagine if December were really warm. We're also on track to have the earliest spring leaf out in history which could be disastrous if we get any brief arctic intrusions in March.
  17. Yeah I'm sure but the warm winters are definitely creating a feedback loop that only reinforces warm/less snowy winters. Hopefully we haven't hit some runaway cycle yet though I'm sure we will soon
×
×
  • Create New...