Jump to content

George001

Members
  • Posts

    6,456
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by George001

  1. Radar looks pretty good. I was nervous when I saw the temps earlier and was thinking this would be a bust for my area. Hoping the NWS had the right idea sticking to their guns calling for 6-8 inches here. I would be happy with that.
  2. Its worse than that, I’m worried we will end up getting another shitty 2-4 inch event. The NWS is forecasting 6-8 inches here, it needs to cool off FAST for that to happen. Unacceptable performance from guidance this close in. The Euro had 8+ for us just yesterday.
  3. I’m concerned about the temps to start, they are warmer than modeled. Im concerned that we are staring down yet another rug pull, guidance was consistent giving me 6+ over the past day or so, but with these starting temps I don’t know about that. Very disappointing
  4. Looks like the goalposts have narrowed. The SE of benchmark track and inland runner track are out, now the question is does the low go right over the benchmark or does it track inside the benchmark and go over the cape?
  5. Yeah I’m feeling good about this one. This will likely be the biggest storm since the Jan 2022 blizzard here, and there are more threats in the pipeline.
  6. I like the setup for threat 3 a lot better than threat 2, but the one that excites me the most is tomorrow’s storm.
  7. Stormy pattern too. We have 3 snow threats over the next 8 days
  8. Realistically I could get anything from rain to a couple inches of fluff to 12-18 inches of snow. Not too common to see that wide a range of possible outcomes this close in.
  9. The low location is 200+ miles NW of where it was being modeled 2 days ago on the GFS. Fast flow patterns are really tough on the models.
  10. I like this setup, yeah you aren’t getting a huge blizzard here but this is a COLD airmass. I love the look on the 6z gfs, around a ~1000mb low near the benchmark with frigid upper levels and surface temps in the mid 20s at the height of the storm. It’s a similar setup to the storm 2 weeks before the huge blizzard in Jan 2022.
  11. So it looks like we have the Navy on board for the day 7 threat. This is a big deal, as other guidance is more weak and strung out. Navgem rule says to watch out as the SE biased Navy being this amped is a red flag…
  12. Yep, the NAVGEM rule is that when the Navy isn’t the farthest SE of all guidance, that’s a red flag the other guidance is too far SE. I wouldn’t ignore the Navy here.
  13. A common theme in modoki la Nina’s is the storm track shifts north in Feb and Mar. Usually that’s not good for the east because it means rain. However, this year has been both colder and has a MUCH farther south storm track than a typical modoki Nina. So the cold shifting more west with the storm track shifting NW come Feb-Mar may not be such a bad thing snow wise. Also depends on what the MJO does. Yeah, If it goes into the null phases after 2-3 that would help us out a lot. Avoiding phases 4-6 is the key. Feb is a tough call, looks more stormy on the long range guidance but temps are a big question mark. It will likely be warmer than Jan, but there is a huge difference between normal or even slightly above normal and a +5 torch. That could easily be the difference between big snows and no snow.
  14. Yep, the snowy -EPO dominant patterns with little to no blocking like Feb 2015 had the western ridge axis centered near Montana. The pattern advertised on long range guidance near the Jan 20th period is different because the western ridge axis is off the west coast. My read on the advertised pattern is it’s a cold pattern, but not a snowy one for coastal areas since the pattern favors lows running inland and warm sectoring us. Definitely looks more like 18-19 than 14-15, classic cold warm up rain, then cold again pattern. Not going to get a classic east coast nor’easter with that look for sure, but hopefully we can score some swfe type systems.
×
×
  • Create New...