ORH_wxman

06z euro is going to be more amped than 00z I think.

Amazing how steady the EPS have been. Kind of hard to go against those at the moment.

Lol. 06z NAM has a powderfreak to SYR band

Both Canadian models were pretty darn fast.

Comparing the pressure pattern (how are the isobars oriented) and the H5 heights, it is significantly more robust than the GFS.

Lol so bizarre. It was definitely more amped through like 48 or 54h. I thought for sure it was coming north this run.

RGEM def a bit more amped than 18z

At least the GFS has the ICON in its corner now.

Rgem is more amped than 18z through 48

That’s so far N it prob dryslots at least southern parts of CT/RI.

NAM is going to be more amped than 18z

Yes. I don’t think anything drastic should happen since this wasn’t way up north where satellite data is more distorted. But could see some small moves.

Yeah he gets in on it this run. Northern edge of the heavy stuff anyway.

We needed to see 96h for the qpf Queens. Lol. That was stronger than 12z there aloft. Prob gets pretty good snows over border into NH/S VT that run.

This is a perfect H5 setup for all of SNE pretty much.

Runnaway doing naked snow angels at 84-90h. That’s destruction out in W CT

18z euro looks a hair NW of 12z

Correct. It’s not actually in position in the middle of the country yet. It is still offshore. A chunk of it comes onshore tonight and then most of the rest will be on shore by 12z run tomorrow.

Vortmax is coming in pretty far west. Even compared to previous storms that got crunched for BOS like Dec 20-21, 2009 or Jan 2016. Often the models underestimate latent heat release to the east of them which is why ticks north on huge systems are somewhat common. They can be offset by huge blocks but a lot of the confluence on these past storms (with further east vort maxes) was significantly more than the current threat we’re seeing. So add it up and I’d favor more bumps north than the other way around. Most of the spread on ensembles is to the north too which is suggesting that there’s more room for small initialization errors being corrected to produce more northerly results. Forecasting a big probability game. It’s maybe something like 50% it trends north, 30% chance it roughly stays the same, and 20% it trends south. You can’t ignore the 20%. 1 out of 5 happens plenty of times. But you will pay more attention to the 50%.

PDI was back when the LFM was the cream of the crop. Lol

Was def north through like 72-78 and then shot east and the end result almost the same up here. The difference is noticeable back in like PA where the good stuff gets further north.

There’s a bit of a streak up there north of Maine trying to hold tough so the gap might be closing. Still looks like it will be north of 12z though.

Vort looks more potent and confluence lifting north a bit faster through 48h on 18z GFS. I’d be surprised if this doesn’t tick north but we’ll see.

I might trust the 84h nam more than the icon. But yeah, that was pretty amped up.

Not on that solution for you. Bent back WF at H7 is already near BOS.