Jump to content

ORH_wxman

Moderator Meteorologist
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    91,771

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by ORH_wxman

  1. ORH_wxman
    Won’t help us aloft. Might keep the sfc colder in the 30s during the rain a d maybe produce some ZR far enough interior like N ORH county. Otherwise, no real effect in terms of snowfall. We’d need the redevelopment to happen in the midlevels for it to matter on snow.
  2. ORH_wxman
    Nothing left to really track with this one down here. Model guidance looks locked in. If we see a move, I’ll become more invested again, but right now it’s just whack-a-mole. I’m expecting maybe 2-3” and then a gully washer. I think 6+ is reserved for N ORH county and Berkshires.
  3. ORH_wxman
    The secondary development at the surface will help hold in the cold air…esp over the interior. However, if the H5 track remains really far west, the precip will still likely flip because the midlevel centers are going to be closer to the H5 forcing than the sfc. But even sfc secondary will help some as it will prob keep the R/S line closer to the coast early on before aloft warms.
  4. ORH_wxman
    It didn’t really move though at 18z. I’ll be more intrigued if it bumps east at 00z.
  5. ORH_wxman
    Yeah we need that secondary development to slow the warming. The coast is prob a done deal but interior still has a lot of variance on what could happen.
  6. ORH_wxman
    It still looks a lot worse than the GFS. It needs another solid bump east.
  7. ORH_wxman
    If you saw the 12z snow maps, the 18z ones are almost exactly the same except they go to 90 hours so have to take that into account. Esp northern peeps.
  8. ORH_wxman
    Yeah we never got the whole system to come back west on that one. However, The PVA ended up really enhancing the banding a bit more than earlier guidance suggested…but that became apparent on the later runs when QPF boosted into the 0.50 range from the lower 0.2-0.3 amounts on earlier runs.
  9. ORH_wxman
    Trying to redevelop the ML center too. But I want to see some more support. No other model looks like that.
  10. ORH_wxman
    Weeklies go back to -PNA and SE Ridge in February....they are frigid for late January though.
  11. ORH_wxman
    It is definitely a Miller A as currently modeled if we're going by the original definitions from Miller et al 1946. If this started tracking into the TN Valley or OH Valley with a clear secondary redevelopment, then we could revisit, but yeah, not really worth the energy debating it at the moment.
  12. ORH_wxman
    12/26-27/12 was a pretty good storm for interior SNE....I think I had 7" with a bunch of IP/ZR in that one. A bit further NW had over a foot.
  13. ORH_wxman
    EPS spread actually increased from 06z which is weird when you get closer.
  14. ORH_wxman
    Crazy cold shallow airmass there. Euro even gets BOS down to 0F.
  15. ORH_wxman
    Yep....how many times over the years (even in biggies like Feb 2013) did the models over-phase the streams? We've seen plenty of times where the southern ends up a little faster and the phase happens later than originally modeled. Doesn't mean it will happen this time, but it's a more realistic scenario than hoping for the northern stream to come in weaker....in my experience, the northern stream will probably come in stronger when sampled.
  16. ORH_wxman
    It's a pretty good thump in SNE too away from the water.
  17. ORH_wxman
    I think one realistic hope on this system is that the southern stream ends up more progressive as we get closer....that's actually a real thing that happens on model guidance a decent amount. I don't have much hope for the northern stream to help us coming in weaker, but a more progressive southern stream seems plausible.
  18. ORH_wxman
    I'm comparing to 06z....00z was really amped, and I agree it will be east of 00z.
  19. ORH_wxman
    Yeah the northern shortwave is the last one to come on shore, so hopefully the northeast height trend is real and the northern stream shortwave trend is spurious....but I'm not holding my breath.
  20. ORH_wxman
    Northern stream shortwave is way stronger this run...so that is going to wipe out any advantage I think in the northeast. Strong northern stream just send this due north from what we know in past runs. Too much whack-a-mole with this system.
  21. ORH_wxman
    12z Euro does look like it's coming in a bit more suppressed with heights in the northeast through 54h vs 06z. The southern shortwave isn't much different...so I'm guessing this one should come east a little from 06z.
  22. ORH_wxman
    I don't think there's much hope for a major snowfall, but there's still the difference between like 8-12" and 2-5" on the table which is a pretty large impact from a sensible wx standpoint.
  23. ORH_wxman
    Only reason I'd still hold out for a bigger solution is that we are still 96h from go time...if we were 72 then I'd be resigned to an Albany or CT River track. But outside of the GFS, there isn't much support for something more favorable. Pending the Euro obviously, but I do not expect it to improve much, if at all, based on other 12z globals. IF Euro comes in flatter and ensembles also show that trend, then I think there is renewed life in this.
  24. ORH_wxman
    That's a solid tick west from 00z which tracked from NYC up into S VT.
  25. ORH_wxman
    Still tracks it well inland...roughly IPT/ALB/BTV
×
×
  • Create New...