Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
  • Posts

    73,720
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. For me, its more about not wanting the invt scenario....ie, give me a storm.
  2. I already mentioned...I buy it at this range....just tough to pin hopes to it as you would a storm because scope is so limited and its relatively unpredictable.
  3. Says that guy who posts every storm modeled past 120 hours.
  4. GEM looks alot like the NAM with placement over central MA.
  5. Grab a 40oz under that and just touch yourself visualizing the CAPE
  6. Well, at this range it probably will actually develop...I buy that part, but its still whocaresville for the 95% of us that don't get under it.
  7. Yea, I can't invest in that crap. Better shot of @weatherwiz appearing on the cover of Muscle & Fitness magazine then me getting under that.
  8. HRRR has it like 10 mi NE of me...I may not be in a bad spot given some sort of compromise. God, what am I doing....its an inverted freaking trough.
  9. You can't forecast those...all you do is engage in an ill advised game of the pin the tail on the delusion.
  10. I'd take that, but I'd almost feel dirty coming from an inverted fraud.
  11. I'll take my chances with some se ridging....the last thing I want this season is more LBSW. I am done with that...if I am going to get screwed, let it snow in Maine.
  12. Absolutely right....it makes the use of analogs more challenging, certainly, but doesn't strip them of their value IMO.
  13. Yea, maybe...possible. In that respect, we will need to wait to see. In the grand scheme of things, we have such a minuscule amount of data that correlations can always change.
  14. I agree...its not the start to the season I expected. You are right that the collection data really intensifies in October, but TBH, it never stops....
  15. Perfectly valid to think the winter will be awful...that may prove correct. All I meant was that fact RE the fall correlation to winter isn't debatable.
  16. Yes. Were said facts always weighted appropriately into the forecast? No, which is why some were misses.
  17. My forecast wasn't cold, it was near normal. Your thoughts and opinions are worthless when they run counter to facts, as are mine.
  18. Yes, because this isn't a subjective argument....if anything, there is an inverse correlation between Sept/Oct and winter. It not about agreeing with me, its about correctly interpreting data. If you would like to argue that this winter will be well below normal in snowfall, feel free, but it won't be because of how mild October was.
  19. Time has already told....the months of September and October don't mean anything with respect to winter, whether this season is mild or not.
×
×
  • Create New...