Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    73,968

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. 40/70 Benchmark
    Oh, you love to flaunt when hills looks snowy, but the coastal dwellers look like shit. lol BS
  2. 40/70 Benchmark
    You don't know him that well....even if a given situation engenders that type of angst from him, he has become passive aggressive enough where he won't let you know that. Whether its the truth or not, he'll think of strawman consolation to focus on and claim that he's content with the situation.
  3. 40/70 Benchmark
    Agree.
  4. 40/70 Benchmark
    Its really looking to protect NE areas a hair more, which is why the snowfall gradient is starting to shift more wnw to ese on the 12z guidance.
  5. 40/70 Benchmark
    RGEM actually tightened the gradient a bit, so its hair less further s in CT and RI, and more from the pike region points N. Low maybe a bit stronger bc its also made the cf more pronounced and tightened the coastal gradient.
  6. 40/70 Benchmark
    Yes, but the more favorable regime has actually been expedited of late, since burgeoning into existence on guidance, not pushed back.
  7. 40/70 Benchmark
    @Typhoon Tip AKA Mr. Hadley may beg to differ....
  8. 40/70 Benchmark
    Jeff is right...it, and the NAM suck....but the one thing you can usually hang your hat on is when they are aggressive with mid level warmth. They tend to pick up on that, while global guidance often underestimates the warm tongue.
  9. 40/70 Benchmark
    What I said is an undeniable fact....there are exceptions to everything.
  10. 40/70 Benchmark
  11. 40/70 Benchmark
    Its nice having the RGEM and NAM trend colder within 48hrs because say what you will about that guidance, but they are usually first to the party at advancing mid level warmth more liberally.
  12. 40/70 Benchmark
    Looks like RGEM tries to get a game of naked twister going in ne MA
  13. 40/70 Benchmark
    RGEM love me long time.
  14. 40/70 Benchmark
    Yiiiiiiikes
  15. 40/70 Benchmark
    My goal is 3"....my first map was a little aggressive, so will probably tone down.
  16. 40/70 Benchmark
    Yea, Narcan has a wide expanse of ~2" beyond rt 128 in eastern MA.
  17. 40/70 Benchmark
    I think this is more realistic and probably close to reality...I can't see the border region being essentially shutout.
  18. 40/70 Benchmark
    Snow
  19. 40/70 Benchmark
    That run bumped me up from 1" at 06z to 3" at 12z. I'll take.
  20. 40/70 Benchmark
    Significantly so...like 50-100mi.
  21. 40/70 Benchmark
    Maybe, but its def. south, too.
  22. 40/70 Benchmark
    Relief for me....for now. We've gone from the pike region flirting with danger, to me.
  23. 40/70 Benchmark
    I see what you mean about everything being a bit too far to the east when looping ensembles....
  24. 40/70 Benchmark
    I am fine with MJO 7...its form the tri state region and points south that shouldn't be.
  25. 40/70 Benchmark
    Even epic patterns can shit the bed.....you just can't lock anything. BTW, Feb 1969 shows you how it usually evens out lol
×
×
  • Create New...