Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
  • Posts

    72,367
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. Of course, the one that counted tracked over Lowell...
  2. That't the date I mentioned yesterday....7th anniversary special?
  3. Yea, its goes in a cycles. Of course for a while last decade, every sea gull queef got funneled over the BM.
  4. I have to be honest....I was wondering last decade if CC was't INCREASING our climo snowfall here in SNE. I never said that because there wasn't near enough data, and now we see why.
  5. Yea, that has always happened and always will. That said, CC certainly isn't making it easier to avoid.
  6. Its been a little of everything....CC has definietely played a role..there have been some marginal events in which we may have fared better 20 years ago, or maybe some near phases that would have phased better back when with less compression. But its also been to a larger degree just some poor multidecadal signals combining with buzzard's luck....that's called regression from the insane 2010's.
  7. Only cold by modern standards, but yea..... Chris glossed over that point by saying it was the expected deviation from MC forcing....I also predicted one this season, as well....but it wasn't a deviation, it was a departure. It wasn't a month or 6 weeks....it was just about all of the season.
  8. If you look back throughout peak of post Pacific cold phases....there have been similar stretches. 1950s had a spell like that.
  9. My interpretation is that its just made that N Jet so active that it impedes proficient phasing, but if I'm wrong...he can chime in.
  10. @AllsnowI like your stance on his...you buy a lot of it, but just don't take the leap that its permanent...more conservative approach. That is my position.
  11. Already is.....his response time is faster now that OT is closed. Now look what we've done.
  12. I wish you didn't tag and summon him...now its going to turn into the CC forum.
  13. "This same pattern would have produced 25" more snow in NYC 25 years ago".
  14. I know...then after a spell of back and forth he will eventually admit that he is "open to new data". Problem is that he has it backwards....assume it will change and be "open to new data" indicating that it won't after a couple of decades.
  15. Forky said it earlier...the West Pac being so warm is what is sending along so many impulses, which presumably is attributable to why the northern stream is so disruptive.
  16. My guess is that they will reference a trend this week that moves the low from Binghamton to Albany, and say "see, it attenuated".
  17. This is what I mean...all of this crap about the west warm pool having the jet get to active, and having too much compression for coastals....where are these factors to prevent the Hudson valley cyclops?? (facetious undertone...not questioning CC)
  18. If the GEM and EURO allowed a monnster coastal to come up because the GFS had the northern stream pressing down, guess which camp would be right? In this case, its undoubtedly the GEM/EURO.
  19. Not to make this political...any party....any person, who relieves someone else of their job should do so with tact. Seeing video of Musk running around with a chainsaw when referencing the firings was barbaric and nauseating. This has zero to do with his policy....maybe the cut downs will be the best decision ever. Not the point.
  20. I have told you I didn't love either one of them.
  21. Never know, maybe I'll start tracking incidence of swamp ass
×
×
  • Create New...