All Activity

I guess I am talking about widespread 20"+....

Anything above 6" is KU material for central park now lmfao. Central park has not gotten a 6" event since January 2022.

Boston and eastern MA largely missed out on that event and it turned to heavy rain for the New York City area for a time. But even with a swath of 10"-20" snows, that event wasn't a high-end KU storm. It was a Category 3 event on the NESIS scale.

I guess that is KU material for you guys, but certainly not something I would consider high-end.

Highest snowfall that year for me was 14” if I remember correctly

2013-2014 also didn't have any higher end KU events if I am not mistaken....perhaps I am, not sure. But I know for my area, there were no really memorable events, which are tougher to achieve without a well placed PNA ridge. It's much easier to get more moderate snowfalls, which is mostly what we saw. Anyway, like I said...no absolutes. You don't absolutely NEED the PNA to cooperate...you can still time everything perfectly, but it's just much tougher.

It's much easier to have east coast winter weather in general without an active PAC jet...I'm not arguing it's favorable. But it's not the only reason the east coast has been struggling. The pattern has sucked. We did manage a -WPO in 2021-2022.

Much easier to get a strong -WPO with a relaxed Pacific Jet not constantly eroding the ridge.

That was one of the most severe -WPO seasons on record. Like I said, nothing operates in a vacuum and there are no absolutes. Lets look at the following year....we must really want an extraordinarily +AO/NAO than.

Not impossible to get a long-term drought, but not too likely given the convergence of storm tracks in our area.

The ridge axis was centered just off the West Coast during the 13-14 winter on the wettest storm days for NYC leading to that much snowier outcome than last winter. But the Pacific Jet was significantly weaker. So it allowed the 500mb ridge to remain in place and not get weakened and undercut by such a fast Pacific Jet. The lack of kickers coming into the West Coast during 13-14 with the weakened Pacific Jet allowed the colder storm track just southeast of NYC with numerous BM redevelopers. The Southeast ridge was much weaker and further east than recent years. 18 storm days for NYC DJF 13-14 with .20+ of precipitation

I’m not sure a true long term drought that would lead to widespread water restrictions like out west is possible with our changing climate. So many ways we can get drenched from a one off deluge or generally ways we can get rain. Our long term precip averages have been going up with our temps.

Looking to do more power today than yesterday. Threw in last year to compare. And this is with one Micro Inverter not reporting. New one is on its way.

SAL has eased up, which will give a window for the new system coming off of Africa to develop in a few days. It is currently at 0% in next 48, but increases to 40% in next 7 days. Even with that, it looks like it will be a fish storm, if it develops. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/gtwo.php?basin=atlc&basin=atlc&fdays=7

Yeah I drove up to the cabin for that storm and it was a nightmare on the roads. We had a solid foot from it though it melted pretty quick.

Altho they do fly strategically - they are impressively hard to stomp

I've wondered something similar about these random blades of grass that pop up in the driveway or walkway. No water, no fertilizer, no nothing but they mange to grow while other parts of the lawn itself are brown.

Yes.

Even as a La Niña event is in its formative stages following a neutral-cool/borderline La Niña winter, 2025's global temperatures remain stubbornly warm. The September 1-10 period ranked as the third warmest (ERA-5 dataset). It was 0.10°C warmer than the fourth place 2020.

If you view the dailies from the dates of major storms, the PNA ridge is centred just off of the west coast. I don't care how fast the PAC jet is, that wouldn't have worked out in 1852. I do agree that PAC jet has been an issue in general, as it makes it more difficult to time the palcement of the PNA ridge correctly, and for it not to fold too quickly. Here is a prime example from last winter of the Pacific jet undercutting a +PNA ridge and thus tilting it positively, leading to a failed phase attempt on the east coast.

i mean we still probably will get a good period of HL blocking w/ -EPO and +PNA its just that theres going to be more SER (especially before/after good periods) with a more developed nina since -QBO relates to more active MJO

Yeah maybe although lanternflies don’t exactly fly gracefully to my eye lol

I have to assume the cicadas didn’t get high enough, being fat and clumsy. Not sure how high the lantern flies can go, but it seems to be high enough.

I have been discussing this for a while now. The rapid expansion of the mid-latitude ridging has been altering the way that the higher latitude teleconnections have been occurring relative to the past. We have also been seeing a much faster Pacific Jet with the record mid-latitude SSTs under these expanding ridges.

+QBO causes the tropical tropopause to stabilize which makes convection focus further off the equator which shifts the pattern more poleward, -QBO would have more active MJO(in general) but more focused on the equator