The 4 Seasons Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago @ORH_wxman @CoastalWx So did Logan get 5.2 or 5.4? Their PNS and ob on the interactive map says 5.2 but they recorded 0.2 on the 6th before midnight and Feb 7th says 5.2. One of them is an error I'm gonna go with 5.4 since thats what's in the record books 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago Yeah unless they change the F6 data then I’d go 5.4. Id prob hedge higher anyway since they had 4.2” at 1pm and got smoked for a while. I thought they’d finish with 6”+. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Yeah 5.4 makes sense. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 4 Seasons Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago QPF is also off...nearly 40:1 ratios. i figure bad catch again from the winds yesterday, shame they don't fix that. ORH is more reasonable 5.2/0.31 17:1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 4 Seasons Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Some new high reports coming out of Essex county now that the 2nd day of cocorahs is rolling out. Another two hours and i can get it all on ACIS2 Beverly 16.2 Beverly 13.6 Hamilton 13 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 12 minutes ago, The 4 Seasons said: QPF is also off...nearly 40:1 ratios. i figure bad catch again from the winds yesterday, shame they don't fix that. ORH is more reasonable 5.2/0.31 17:1 For Logan? I’ve mentioned this before, but their gauge is always off. Dendrite mentioned that it shouldn’t be based on the type, but they are always low. Always. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 2 minutes ago, CoastalWx said: For Logan? I’ve mentioned this before, but their gauge is always off. Dendrite mentioned that it shouldn’t be based on the type, but they are always low. Always. ORH used to have that problem. Not as much these days but check out some of their old reports from the 2000s and 2010s. Some of the storms are like 50 to 1 ratios. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 2 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said: ORH used to have that problem. Not as much these days but check out some of their old reports from the 2000s and 2010s. Some of the storms are like 50 to 1 ratios. Even in all rain events they’re low. Especially if wind is involved. At first I thought it was coincidence, but in the events where I’ve compared around, they are low when wind is involved. I’m sure when snow is involved it’s worse. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 4 Seasons Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago Preliminary snowfall totals for CT. I'll have all the final maps for CT/SNE/Tri-State done by tomorrow morning ish. May end up needing to change the ranges well see. Highest CT report is 4SW Voluntown @ 10.8" 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FXWX Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago Just now, The 4 Seasons said: Preliminary snowfall totals for CT. I'll have all the final maps done by tomorrow morning ish. May end up needing to change the ranges well see. Highest CT report is 4SW Voluntown @ 10.8" 2.2 Burlington 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, ORH_wxman said: ORH used to have that problem. Not as much these days but check out some of their old reports from the 2000s and 2010s. Some of the storms are like 50 to 1 ratios. The heated tipping buckets early in the ASOS era were terrible. I think they’re all over to weighing gauges with antifreeze now. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, CoastalWx said: For Logan? I’ve mentioned this before, but their gauge is always off. Dendrite mentioned that it shouldn’t be based on the type, but they are always low. Always. Where are the BOS and ORH snow obs taken from now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 5 minutes ago, dendrite said: Where are the BOS and ORH snow obs taken from now? BOS is in East Boston. Very close to the airport. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 11 minutes ago, CoastalWx said: BOS is in East Boston. Very close to the airport. Yeah idk…they have an AWPAGs and an 8ft diameter windscreen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago They didn’t plot the 16”. Boo. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 4 Seasons Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 4 minutes ago, dendrite said: They didn’t plot the 16”. Boo. whats your thoughts on the 16.2 in beverly? legit? im debating whether or not to include it in. There is also a 13.6" report in SW beverly which seems to be a bit more realistic and whats in line with surrounding totals. But i still can see 16.2 being possible right in the sweet spot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 6 minutes ago, The 4 Seasons said: whats your thoughts on the 16.2 in beverly? legit? im debating whether or not to include it in. There is also a 13.6" report in SW beverly which seems to be a bit more realistic and whats in line with surrounding totals. But i still can see 16.2 being possible right in the sweet spot There’s a guy that plays a musical instrument that went there yesterday to take measurements. This dude said no more than 8-10 anywhere there . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FXWX Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 17 minutes ago, The 4 Seasons said: whats your thoughts on the 16.2 in beverly? legit? im debating whether or not to include it in. There is also a 13.6" report in SW beverly which seems to be a bit more realistic and whats in line with surrounding totals. But i still can see 16.2 being possible right in the sweet spot Much like summer thunderstorm rainfall totals, these meso-scale banding events can have extreme differences across very small distances; think lake effect snows??? I would dismiss it off hand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FXWX Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 26 minutes ago, dendrite said: They didn’t plot the 16”. Boo. But they show a 12 to 16" color zone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 18 minutes ago, The 4 Seasons said: whats your thoughts on the 16.2 in beverly? legit? im debating whether or not to include it in. There is also a 13.6" report in SW beverly which seems to be a bit more realistic and whats in line with surrounding totals. But i still can see 16.2 being possible right in the sweet spot They were pounding when all of those 10-12” reports came out yesterday mid morning. I honestly expected to see more 15-18” obs. Those who cleared probably did, those who let it set probably stuck around that 12-13” mark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago The w.e. checks out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago And for shids and gigs the BOS radar estimates. Obviously the values don’t explicitly matter, but it at least gives you an idea of who had the most. Looks like that little finger of green is right where that total was. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Yep I’m with @dendrite, I was surprised we didn’t get more 16-20” reports when we had a bunch of 10-13” reports by mid morning. So I’d say that 16” is legit and there’s prob a few more areas that did just good near them but didn’t report. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 4 Seasons Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 26 minutes ago, FXWX said: Much like summer thunderstorm rainfall totals, these meso-scale banding events can have extreme differences across very small distances; think lake effect snows??? I would dismiss it off hand? Oh no i totally agree with you and dendrite. If you seen some of my posts from yesterday I said I expect to see 15-18" totals since some of those were from mid morning 9am to noon. Just the fact there was only one gave me some pause and the other Beverly report that was less by 3". But i do believe it, just expected more of them. I can only fit one, so i have to choose what to include. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 4 Seasons Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 42 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: There’s a guy that plays a musical instrument that went there yesterday to take measurements. This dude said no more than 8-10 anywhere there . Of course he did. There's also plenty of 3-4" reports in Cumberland 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 4 Seasons Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 31 minutes ago, FXWX said: But they show a 12 to 16" color zone? Fixed ranges. So the 13" reports will pop a 12-18" color range even without including the 16.2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FXWX Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 14 minutes ago, The 4 Seasons said: Fixed ranges. So the 13" reports will pop a 12-18" color range even without including the 16.2. got it... thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now