Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,604
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    eloveday
    Newest Member
    eloveday
    Joined

Friday February 6 FROPA / WINDEX small event


HoarfrostHubb
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, The 4 Seasons said:

QPF is also off...nearly 40:1 ratios. i figure bad catch again from the winds yesterday, shame they don't fix that.

ORH is more reasonable 5.2/0.31 17:1

For Logan? I’ve mentioned this before, but their gauge is always off. Dendrite mentioned that it shouldn’t be based on the type, but they are always low. Always.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

For Logan? I’ve mentioned this before, but their gauge is always off. Dendrite mentioned that it shouldn’t be based on the type, but they are always low. Always.

ORH used to have that problem. Not as much these days but check out some of their old reports from the 2000s and 2010s. Some of the storms are like 50 to 1 ratios. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

ORH used to have that problem. Not as much these days but check out some of their old reports from the 2000s and 2010s. Some of the storms are like 50 to 1 ratios. 

Even in all rain events they’re low. Especially if wind is involved. At first I thought it was coincidence, but in the events where I’ve compared around, they are low when wind is involved. 
 

I’m sure when snow is involved it’s worse.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The 4 Seasons said:

Preliminary snowfall totals for CT. I'll have all the final maps done by tomorrow morning ish. May end up needing to change the ranges well see. Highest CT report is 4SW Voluntown @ 10.8" 

02_07.26_jdj_v3_ct_hi_res_snowfall_totals.thumb.jpg.561fa6ec8ec61dd70dcb140d96d3f162.jpg

2.2 Burlington 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ORH_wxman said:

ORH used to have that problem. Not as much these days but check out some of their old reports from the 2000s and 2010s. Some of the storms are like 50 to 1 ratios. 

The heated tipping buckets early in the ASOS era were terrible. I think they’re all over to weighing gauges with antifreeze now.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CoastalWx said:

For Logan? I’ve mentioned this before, but their gauge is always off. Dendrite mentioned that it shouldn’t be based on the type, but they are always low. Always.

Where are the BOS and ORH snow obs taken from now? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, dendrite said:

They didn’t plot the 16”.

Boo.

whats your thoughts on the 16.2 in beverly? legit? im debating whether or not to include it in. There is also a 13.6" report in SW beverly which seems to be a bit more realistic and whats in line with surrounding totals. But i still can see 16.2 being possible right in the sweet spot 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, The 4 Seasons said:

whats your thoughts on the 16.2 in beverly? legit? im debating whether or not to include it in. There is also a 13.6" report in SW beverly which seems to be a bit more realistic and whats in line with surrounding totals. But i still can see 16.2 being possible right in the sweet spot 

There’s a guy that plays a musical instrument that went there yesterday to take measurements. This dude said no more than 8-10 anywhere there .

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, The 4 Seasons said:

whats your thoughts on the 16.2 in beverly? legit? im debating whether or not to include it in. There is also a 13.6" report in SW beverly which seems to be a bit more realistic and whats in line with surrounding totals. But i still can see 16.2 being possible right in the sweet spot 

Much like summer thunderstorm rainfall totals, these meso-scale banding events can have extreme differences across very small distances; think lake effect snows???  I would dismiss it off hand?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, The 4 Seasons said:

whats your thoughts on the 16.2 in beverly? legit? im debating whether or not to include it in. There is also a 13.6" report in SW beverly which seems to be a bit more realistic and whats in line with surrounding totals. But i still can see 16.2 being possible right in the sweet spot 

They were pounding when all of those 10-12” reports came out yesterday mid morning. I honestly expected to see more 15-18” obs. Those who cleared probably did, those who let it set probably stuck around that 12-13” mark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And for shids and gigs the BOS radar estimates. Obviously the values don’t explicitly matter, but it at least gives you an idea of who had the most. Looks like that little finger of green is right where that total was.

IMG_5479.jpeg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep I’m with @dendrite, I was surprised we didn’t get more 16-20” reports when we had a bunch of 10-13” reports by mid morning. So I’d say that 16” is legit and there’s prob a few more areas that did just good near them but didn’t report. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, FXWX said:

Much like summer thunderstorm rainfall totals, these meso-scale banding events can have extreme differences across very small distances; think lake effect snows???  I would dismiss it off hand?

Oh no i totally agree with you and dendrite. If you seen some of my posts from yesterday I said I expect to see 15-18" totals since some of those were from mid morning 9am to noon. Just the fact there was only one gave me some pause and the other Beverly report that was less by 3". But i do believe it, just expected more of them. I can only fit one,  so i have to choose what to include. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...