Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,691
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    dorkchop
    Newest Member
    dorkchop
    Joined

1-30/2-1-26 Arctic Blast, ULL Snow Event


John1122
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, fountainguy97 said:

IMG_0062.thumb.png.c00290e09e15b119fa1e12e8cd313fa6.png}

I will take 7.2 inches over my, less than one inch possible point forecast. To bad, we really can't lock it in.  It is strange to me that the NWS would have me under a WS warning and be calling for less than one inch of dry snow that will blow away with the wind.  I know that they don't even believe their own forecast or the warnings would not be out. Whats is the point.  Maybe I am being too hard, but I think it is partly why they are ridiculed so much.  Ok I promise I will not complain anymore.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bearman said:

I will take 7.2 inches over my, less than one inch possible point forecast. To bad, we really can't lock it in.  It is strange to me that the NWS would have me under a WS warning and be calling for less than one inch of dry snow that will blow away with the wind.  I know that they don't even believe their own forecast or the warnings would not be out. Whats is the point.  Maybe I am being too hard, but I think it is partly why they are ridiculed so much.  Ok I promise I will not complain anymore.

We've all been there before so I feel ya! I was fightin mad in the Jan 24 storm to get slush and sleet. Totally failure when all systems were a go. MRX may bump totals back up overnight. They may be waiting for more hi res trends first. I wouldn't be surprised if they are a little conservative than usual after they jumped on the hype train a little early on last week's storm. Which I thought was unusual for them. 

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will take 7.2 inches over my, less than one inch possible point forecast. To bad, we really can't lock it in.  It is strange to me that the NWS would have me under a WS warning and be calling for less than one inch of dry snow that will blow away with the wind.  I know that they don't even believe their own forecast or the warnings would not be out. Whats is the point.  Maybe I am being too hard, but I think it is partly why they are ridiculed so much.  Ok I promise I will not complain anymore.

The point forecast has zero human element to it.


.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, John1122 said:

It's because they used many of the 0z Euro ensembles for that 18z NBM and the 0z Euro was very dry compared to all runs today. 

Yeah, just think offices are becoming to reliant so to speak on the NBM...instead of going with what makes most sense.

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TellicoWx said:

Yeah, just think offices are becoming to reliant so to speak on the NBM...instead of going with what makes most sense.

I don't know why it's so far behind. I'd heard it was one cycle, but they used the Euro from 3 cycles back, and the GEFS from 2 back, plus the SREF/RAP and a few others. I'm not even sure if they used the NAM at all, or the OP Euro or OP GFS. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, John1122 said:

I don't know why it's so far behind. I'd heard it was one cycle, but they used the Euro from 3 cycles back, and the GEFS from 2 back, plus the SREF/RAP and a few others. I'm not even sure if they used the NAM at all, or the OP Euro or OP GFS. 

Doesn't make alot of sense..would think within the normal 36 hr window would want to use the most up to date data

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll say this. I have rarely seen the Euro bust badly from 24-36 hours out. Granted, it's normally being dr no at this range. But it's normally excellent with QPF at this distance.  

Also keep in mind, the Euro is a high resolution model essentially. It's resolution is better than the 12k nam by quite a bit. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, for some reason when I select the 00z Jan 30th 2026 NBM 6 hr snow fall at hr 36, it says it's using model runs from Dec 17, 2025 on the NBM dashboard. So I'm not sure which runs of what model they are using but I can't find any model that gives me a half an inch besides the UK. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, John1122 said:

The 0z NBM was pretty much a repeat of the 18z. Gonna see what models they used. It literally has 1/2 inch for me. 

Yea…I miffed by the NBM.  It’s interesting that it looks like it uses old data/model runs.  Please let us know what you find out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...