Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    19,017
    Total Members
    49,013
    Most Online
    loganboehmewx
    Newest Member
    loganboehmewx
    Joined

Extreme Cold, Snow & Sleet: SECS 1/24 - 1/26


TriPol
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, WeatherGeek2025 said:

i'd go with HRRR for the storm totals! Looks like a foot of snow is common around the area and yes maybe i'm being aggressive but NAM is being retired for a reason!

Post less

  • Like 4
  • Weenie 1
  • 100% 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I take it as the worst possible outcome and the hi-res RGEM as the best because of the front end thump that still drops 10-12" despite changing most of us over. That said if sleet really makes it to I-84 those of us down here are screwed for anything major and we might struggle to make it to a warning criteria event. We're not there yet but by tonight if the NAM still totally sucks I'll take it more seriously. I didn't like the GFS cutting back at 6z either. NAM has been too aggressive with the warm layer in the past but it will probably be more right than other models close in. We should also monitor obs in the South/TN Valley for how far the warm layer is advancing vs what models have. 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NAM ugly for NYC south. At this point have to start taking it more seriously given it's ability to sniff out mid level warming better than other models. I am not saying ride it 100% but I wouldn't discount it either.

It sniffed out the warm nose idea first, but it also has a tendency to be amped an overdo things. Let's hope that's the case.


.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Stormlover74 said:

What did we ever do to the nam? Why does it hate us so

Adapted from Tayor Swift's "We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together."

We hadn’t synced a single run all month,
’Cause you said you needed space (What?)
Then you come around again and say,
“NAM, I miss you, swear the PNA’s gonna change, trust me.”
Remember how that lasted for a day?

You ditch me when the ridge* is gone,
Then beg me for that coastal bomb— “Show snow!” you plead.
But I’ve evolved, I’m done, I’ve got a mission: sabotage.

’Cause I am never, ever, ever, ever showing snow together.
Like, ever.
I’m gonna warm-nose every layer,
Torch the mid-levels ’til you suffer.
I’m never, ever, ever, ever showing snow together.
Like, ever.

Oh, you blamed me when the PNA stayed negative,
Ghosted me for globals, called me “clown guidance,” so repetitive.
So now I’m cranking 850s warm,
Killing totals storm by storm,
And every run you beg and pray—
I’ll melt it all away…

’Cause I am never, ever, ever, ever showing snow together.
Like, ever.

I’ll overdo the mixing,
I’ll break your wintry fever.
Yeah, we are never, ever, ever, ever getting snow together—
Like, ever.

*-PNA Ridge

  • Like 5
  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SACRUS said:


1/24 12z NAM

Total QPF

qpf_acc-imp.us_ne.png

 

12z Total Snow / Sleet (10:1)

sn10_acc-imp.us_ne.png

That outcome might make it a high end advisory event here, maybe we barely scrape it to a warning event with added sleet on top while Boston gets possibly 18". Would go into the long list of SWFEs that suck absolute donkey balls. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jm1220 said:

That outcome might make it a high end advisory event here, maybe we barely scrape it to a warning event with added sleet on top while Boston gets possibly 18". Would go into the long list of SWFEs that suck absolute donkey balls. 

Dude have some positivity you’re posting nothing but negative thoughts for our area. Maybe we’ll bust in a positive way, not likely but you never know

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Prue11 said:

Dude have some positivity you’re posting nothing but negative thoughts for our area. Maybe we’ll bust in a positive way, not likely but you never know

I said it's a possible outcome that I'm not taking too seriously yet and the hi-res RGEM is another possible outcome lol. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

That outcome might make it a high end advisory event here, maybe we barely scrape it to a warning event with added sleet on top while Boston gets possibly 18". Would go into the long list of SWFEs that suck absolute donkey balls. 

SWFEs usually underperform here at the coast, I never get excited about them. We just better hope that the thump is going to be very heavy because the changeover time seems to get sped up with every set of runs.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless of what happens....

 

1 - The heaviest snow is during the day so we actually get to see and enjoy it for once (always seems to happen overnight!)

2 - Good chance of thundersnow and insane banding

 

Enjoy this one... should be a good show 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Prue11 said:

Dude have some positivity you’re posting nothing but negative thoughts for our area. Maybe we’ll bust in a positive way, not likely but you never know

Hes actually right about SWFEs. They suck for our area .

One thing we have going for us is the cold air when the storm arrives.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MJO812 said:

Hes actually right about SWFEs. They suck for our area .

One thing we have going for us is the cold air when the storm arrives.

Yeah they do but if we get 6-10” it’s a win for the coast

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a more serious note regarding the NAM, the RGEM's high-resolution model and most of the global models use 4dVAR (four-dimensional variation) initialization. The NAM uses the older 3dVAR (three-dimensional variation) initialization. The general idea of warmer air moving in to change the snow to sleet in coastal areas and the New York City area and its nearby suburbs is the baseline idea due to lots of support. It's uncertain whether the NAM is overdoing things on account of its older initialization scheme or if it sees something the other guidance doesn't. If it begins to adjust late today (18z or later), that could be an indication that the older initialization process was playing a role. If, on the other hand, the other guidance starts shifting, that will indicate that the NAM, despite its limitations, had correctly resolved some of the details ahead of the other guidance.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Prue11 said:

Dude have some positivity you’re posting nothing but negative thoughts for our area. Maybe we’ll bust in a positive way, not likely but you never know

the poster knows his stuff. and he has seen this before many times, so have i. i have been saying the ceiling around here has been about 6 in my lifetime for these kinds of events, however, nws seems convinced a wall of heavy snow is coming first, making this one different. i have seen a foot of snow pile up really fast a few times, jan 1987 comes to mind, a disaster on a weekday no one was ready for. hand over my heart i expect 5-6 out of this out here, but won't discount experts who think it could be more.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...