Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    masonj4
    Newest Member
    masonj4
    Joined

Pittsburgh/Western PA WINTER ‘25/‘26


 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Rd9108 said:

Btw is this a case where if its snowing hard enough that it will be snow for the fringe areas?

this is an interesting question. I'm not sure the heavy precip can have the same affect on a column of air that has already been saturated? Someone way smarter than me would need to address this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MikeB_01 said:

this is an interesting question. I'm not sure the heavy precip can have the same affect on a column of air that has already been saturated? Someone way smarter than me would need to address this

Once you saturate the column, heavy precipitation won't cool the column from evaporative cooling.  You can get cooling from melting but by that point you are likely getting sleet mixing in.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From another board on the latest PGH NWS discussion

"I believe they are wrong but they are thinking the warm nose cuts further north through West Virginia. I think many mets (outside of content now) are underestimating the QPF that's going to come north. Part of it is that you really don't want to bust by predicting too high because you've gotten the masses in a frenzy, but I also feel that what has been shown this year is that you need to add 10-20% to the performance of the system. Maybe the warm nose does cut in, but I'll take my chances and say that that low doesn't hang on as long."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, colonel717 said:

From another board on the latest PGH NWS discussion

"I believe they are wrong but they are thinking the warm nose cuts further north through West Virginia. I think many mets (outside of content now) are underestimating the QPF that's going to come north. Part of it is that you really don't want to bust by predicting too high because you've gotten the masses in a frenzy, but I also feel that what has been shown this year is that you need to add 10-20% to the performance of the system. Maybe the warm nose does cut in, but I'll take my chances and say that that low doesn't hang on as long."

Is this from someone you trust or some weenie (like me)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mailman said:

Is this from someone you trust or some weenie (like me)?

Ha ha. Someone who I trust. He is from Cranberry and went to PSU Meteorology. He said just look at the precipitable water image and you will see how much moisture.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This one is in the bag...:D Time to focus on reeling in next weekend potential. We will most likely be a western edge hit if anything. I wonder how the snow pack after this storm will affect the next one. How will snow pack help set up the baroclinic zone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, colonel717 said:

This one is in the bag...:D Time to focus on reeling in next weekend potential. We will most likely be a western edge hit if anything. I wonder how the snow pack after this storm will affect the next one. How will snow pack help set up the baroclinic zone.

:lol:

That storm next weekend is a legit blizzard.

Key for us, assuming its anywhere close to accurate is get that phase to happen much earlier. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...