Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,691
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    dorkchop
    Newest Member
    dorkchop
    Joined

Richmond Metro/Hampton Roads Area Discussion


RIC Airport
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Sernest14 said:

I don’t understand everything showing minimal snow then that shows up on a blend model

the NBM is unfortunately broken. its ratios are wildly overstated - I know there have been discussions of 15-20:1 ratios, but the ratios the NBM uses at least on the weatherbell maps are like 40:1, 50:1, or even more in some situations

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Ephesians2 said:

the NBM is unfortunately broken. its ratios are wildly overstated - I know there have been discussions of 15-20:1 ratios, but the ratios the NBM uses at least on the weatherbell maps are like 40:1, 50:1, or even more in some situations

Just ChatGPT’d the map and it basically downgraded everything the nbm shows for this area.  Pretty interesting read.  Asked it what ratios are used and why it shows so high compared to many models tha show 0-1”

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Sernest14 said:

I don’t understand everything showing minimal snow then that shows up on a blend model

17 minutes ago, Ephesians2 said:

the NBM is unfortunately broken. its ratios are wildly overstated - I know there have been discussions of 15-20:1 ratios, but the ratios the NBM uses at least on the weatherbell maps are like 40:1, 50:1, or even more in some situations

The problem is, it lags a cycle or so behind so it's using old data and still catching up. The 00z run should have lower totals around RIC based on trends.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, migratingwx said:

The problem is, it lags a cycle or so behind so it's using old data and still catching up. The 00z run should have lower totals around RIC based on trends.

image.thumb.png.19480e10de577bc354346d26bf8260dd.pngimage.thumb.png.34a0c19dfdb4d34c9d6182152d37daca.pngFor RIC it has 7" of snow on 0.2" precip
But where it is REALLY broken is along the northwest fringe, as you can see there is basically no QPF but the NBM is still showing accumulating snow.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wasnow215 said:

How can a "blend of models" get higher totals than the model that shows the most snow lol. Makes no sense. It's like saying 0+2+0+4+1 divided by 5 equals 5 :D

Confession. I am the  one who actually puts  out the  NBM with a secret  snow  formula

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Sernest14 said:

Just ChatGPT’d the map and it basically downgraded everything the nbm shows for this area.  Pretty interesting read.  Asked it what ratios are used and why it shows so high compared to many models tha show 0-1”

I did that too and got scolded on the MA forum.  I asked for an interpretation of the latest NBM.  Interesting response.  Tempered nit cliff diving.h

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...