Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Let's talk winter!


Steve

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Port Columbus picked up 2.7" last night.  This puts the seasonal total at 13.4" so far. 

 

So let's look at seasonal snowfall records through December 10th.

 

First, the long-term snowfall average through the 10th: 3.1"

 

Average by decade, highest to lowest.

1950s: 6.8"

1880s: 4.1"

1960s: 4.1"

2010s (so far): 3.9"

1970s: 3.4"

1890s: 3.1"

1930s: 3.1"

1910s: 3.0"

1920s: 2.9"

1980s: 2.8"

1900s: 2.4"

1990s: 2.2"

2000s: 2.2"

1940s: 0.9"

 

Top 10 Years for Snowfall Through December 10th

1. 1880: 19.1"

2. 1950: 16.5"

3. 1966: 15.4"

4. 2013: 13.4"

5. 1958: 13.2"

6. 1917: 9.6"

7. 1957: 8.5"

8. 1920: 8.2"

9. 1984: 8.2"

10. 1977: 8.0"

 

This is a pretty good group to be in.  No one should complain about a 4th best start to winter ever.

 

Here are some other recent good or well-known winters and how they started through the 10th.

 

2010: 1.3"

2009: 0"

2007: 5.7"

2002: 4.9"

2000: 3.3"

1995: 3.1"

1993: 5.4"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for those stats.  We are beating 1977! 

 

Obviously we have to be cautious about the rest of winter...Looking at some of the years around our current position reveals a toss up on total seasonal snowfall.  A few of those years had 40+ inches and others had below normal for the season.  Maybe some further research into other factors for those years would give us a better idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for those stats.  We are beating 1977! 

 

Obviously we have to be cautious about the rest of winter...Looking at some of the years around our current position reveals a toss up on total seasonal snowfall.  A few of those years had 40+ inches and others had below normal for the season.  Maybe some further research into other factors for those years would give us a better idea.

 

Only 2 years didn't have normal to above normal snowfall: 1920 and 1957.  1920 is a fluke year, by any measure.  The snow that fell before the 10th was entirely from a single storm in mid-November rather than spread out in multiple events.  And there was very little snow after that.  The monthly breakdown November-April was 8.2", 3.3", 0.7", 4.2", Trace, 0.3".  There was also very little, if any, cold weather to speak of through December.  Neither of these conditions match this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

roads around central ohio are worse than they've been anytime this season.  Much worse than any point during our winter storm warning.

Agreed they were far worse this morning. My commute was 5 times as long as normal. Seems like the advisory criteria should take into account temperature maybe to better anticipate the impact on roadways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ILN going with all snow for the 70 corridor (so far) for Friday-Sunday storm, with a mix south.  If it is all snow, this could be another 4"-8" type event.

 

The 'other' JB's reasoning behind it being mostly snow in our area....

 

"The reason I am confident about the first storm being mainly snow north of the Ohio river and Mason Dixon line, with crucial fights in the coastal plain, is that snow breeds cold and snow breeds snow. The snowcover makes the air over it colder, which affects the pressure, which in turn expands the dome of cold and also supplies a boundary where cold resists warm. Storms travel further south for one and the dome of cold, if only slightly larger, is big enough so when lifted, cools the air and makes what might have been rain or sleet snow. So the trend of the model is predictable give the cold around, and the fact that there is warmth close by for the storm to focus on. Bottom line I like the ECWMF on number 1 which goes from this Sat am"    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed they were far worse this morning. My commute was 5 times as long as normal. Seems like the advisory criteria should take into account temperature maybe to better anticipate the impact on roadways.

 

I've always thought they should be able to override that in the event of something like this morning.  But I guess that gets sketchy when there is room for subjective criteria...But still, this morning needed some sort of headline to warn the public.  I'm just not sure what kind of hard "criteria" to put on that other than "overnight snowfall > 1 inch coupled with temperatures < 25F"  which isn't exactly ultra specific....

 

The 'other' JB's reasoning behind it being mostly snow in our area....

 

"The reason I am confident about the first storm being mainly snow north of the Ohio river and Mason Dixon line, with crucial fights in the coastal plain, is that snow breeds cold and snow breeds snow. The snowcover makes the air over it colder, which affects the pressure, which in turn expands the dome of cold and also supplies a boundary where cold resists warm. Storms travel further south for one and the dome of cold, if only slightly larger, is big enough so when lifted, cools the air and makes what might have been rain or sleet snow. So the trend of the model is predictable give the cold around, and the fact that there is warmth close by for the storm to focus on. Bottom line I like the ECWMF on number 1 which goes from this Sat am"    

 

Not that I disagree with him, but I've had warm air blast right over my beautiful snowpack to allow for an advancing low to cross the region too many times to buy right into that.

 

I do think having snow on the ground will help us and it clearly won't be melting away before Saturday.  Heck, at this point it appears likely we will even add at least an inch or two to start the storm regardless.  The thing is, especially for us central/central eastern Ohioans, even a relatively weak low into northeast KY / extreme SE Ohio can just nudge us up to 33 (and maybe even still mostly snow).  BUT at that temp we will be significantly cutting back on any accumulation.  It's not a massive warm surge that I'm worried about, but the typical subtle bump above freezing that often comes our way.  That being said, I do thin a mix to sleet or rain is possible especially if the low is a bit stronger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always thought they should be able to override that in the event of something like this morning.  But I guess that gets sketchy when there is room for subjective criteria...But still, this morning needed some sort of headline to warn the public.  I'm just not sure what kind of hard "criteria" to put on that other than "overnight snowfall > 1 inch coupled with temperatures < 25F"  which isn't exactly ultra specific....

 

 

Not that I disagree with him, but I've had warm air blast right over my beautiful snowpack to allow for an advancing low to cross the region too many times to buy right into that.

 

I do think having snow on the ground will help us and it clearly won't be melting away before Saturday.  Heck, at this point it appears likely we will even add at least an inch or two to start the storm regardless.  The thing is, especially for us central/central eastern Ohioans, even a relatively weak low into northeast KY / extreme SE Ohio can just nudge us up to 33 (and maybe even still mostly snow).  BUT at that temp we will be significantly cutting back on any accumulation.  It's not a massive warm surge that I'm worried about, but the typical subtle bump above freezing that often comes our way.  That being said, I do thin a mix to sleet or rain is possible especially if the low is a bit stronger.

 

Good points, and I agree that simply having a very cold airmass in place is not a guarantee against a changeover to rain.  I recall a few times when we were in the single digits within 24 hours of plain rain.   That being said, some of our heftiest snowfalls are from WAA events.  Many times, by the time enough warm air gets into place, the bulk of the precip is done and we end up with a decent snow followed by drizzle.    The models are hinting at that type of scenario.    We'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always thought they should be able to override that in the event of something like this morning.  But I guess that gets sketchy when there is room for subjective criteria...But still, this morning needed some sort of headline to warn the public.  I'm just not sure what kind of hard "criteria" to put on that other than "overnight snowfall > 1 inch coupled with temperatures < 25F"  which isn't exactly ultra specific....

 

 

Not that I disagree with him, but I've had warm air blast right over my beautiful snowpack to allow for an advancing low to cross the region too many times to buy right into that.

 

I do think having snow on the ground will help us and it clearly won't be melting away before Saturday.  Heck, at this point it appears likely we will even add at least an inch or two to start the storm regardless.  The thing is, especially for us central/central eastern Ohioans, even a relatively weak low into northeast KY / extreme SE Ohio can just nudge us up to 33 (and maybe even still mostly snow).  BUT at that temp we will be significantly cutting back on any accumulation.  It's not a massive warm surge that I'm worried about, but the typical subtle bump above freezing that often comes our way.  That being said, I do thin a mix to sleet or rain is possible especially if the low is a bit stronger.

 

Good points, and I agree that simply having a very cold airmass in place is not a guarantee against a changeover to rain.  I recall a few times when we were in the single digits within 24 hours of plain rain.   That being said, some of our heftiest snowfalls are from WAA events.  Many times, by the time enough warm air gets into place, the bulk of the precip is done and we end up with a decent snow followed by drizzle.    The models are hinting at that type of scenario.    We'll see.

I noticed that too about the drizzle. So maybe we can pick up a nice 2-4 but only melt away a tiny bit in the few hours we bump above freezing.

Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ILN still going with mainly a snow event for I-70 this weekend. Both the GFS and Nam are primarily snow for us. :popcorn:

 

Euro much colder....looks like all snow anywhere north of the river....only issue now is strength of this 'system'.

 

edit:  6z gfs is also further southeast and colder.   The trade-off for colder is a weaker slug of moisture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will Columbus hit 20" or more for the season before December is out?  It's certainly possible. 

 

Of the top 10 seasonal snowfall years by December 10th, here is how they ended up through December 31st:

 

1880: 30.9"

1950: 25.7"

1966: 16.8"

1917: 15.7"

1958: 13.7"

2013*: 13.4"

1920: 11.5"

1977: 9.7"

1957: 8.5"

1984: 8.2"

 

*Through December 11th.  With even 4" through the rest of the month, that would put us at 3rd snowiest through December ever, and with the cold generally looking to stick around through Christmas, there's bound to be another snowfall between Saturday's event and the rest of the month.  20", btw, would be about 71% of an entire season's average snowfall.  While very rare, this year has that potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really hope we get more then our local mets are calling for..most saying 1 maybe 2 inches..accuweather close to 3-6 and TWC 3-5..i will make a call after it falls!! LOL..Larry Cosgrove saying 2-4!

 

Solutions are pretty much in agreement of a weaker wave, which means colder temps... but also potentially lower amounts of precip.  If I had to guess right now, I'd say 3-5" along and near 70. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Solutions are pretty much in agreement of a weaker wave, which means colder temps... but also potentially lower amounts of precip.  If I had to guess right now, I'd say 3-5" along and near 70. 

Would be ok with that..also looks to get rteal cold before Christmas!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would be ok with that..also looks to get rteal cold before Christmas!!

 

The -EPO is definitely our friend this winter, much like the -AO was during 2009-2010.  It doesn't look to go positive through the month, at least at this point.  The snow and cold so far bode well historically, and that's what I'm more comfortable with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...