Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,589
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    cryptoblizzard
    Newest Member
    cryptoblizzard
    Joined

September 8th Severe Threat


SmokeEater

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 201
  • Created
  • Last Reply

...and BTW, this was pretty well modeled for a couple of days...going from 5 to 45% in 36 hrs is kinda lolworthy. This *probably* should have been slight risked yesterday in a day 3.

Maybe. Although Keep in mind instability is still limited on the GFS and EC. With the dynamics in place 500 J/KG mixed layer CAPE may be enough, though one would prefer 1000 or better for severe weather. With a March event in the OH valley the NAM was considerably more unstable and ended up being the correct solution. Dinnertime seams reasonable in Philly for storm timing with the best spot to see the storms in action should be from NE PA into southern NY. Widespread wind damage is the bigtime concern as the LLJ really cranks up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know what this means for later today, but there's cells firing down in the Delmarva, moving NNE.

NAM's got them. They should be out of here by Noon.

NAM really honks the worst of this per hi res towards Scranton and Mount Pocono...our end of the squall line isn't as sharply defined and robust as it is farther north (note how sharp the reds/oranges are on the edge of the line as it hits the Water Gap)...the LLJ is stronger to our north as the low stays pretty far to our north. This isn't to say we won't get it bad here but I think the damage reports locally may be a bit more isolated compared to our north.

post-105-0-84061400-1347098407_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a830 tee time @ jack frost national tomorrow morning ( 1st of a4 day golf trip suckers!) . But I'm really debating whether or not I should head up this afternoon or tomorrow morning,..decision decision dicision...I'll worry about it later. I'm really thinking anything isolated that can pop today could produce some rotation, especially up that way...however, storm speed could be an issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There appears to be some breaks in the "overcast" this morning over central PA, however it still looks (on the visible image) that there is >50% cloudcover to contend with. Are those breaks going to be enough to allow for the instability necessary to fire off severe later this afternoon? At the moment, my location is locked in with wall to wall overcast skies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There appears to be some breaks in the "overcast" this morning over central PA, however it still looks (on the visible image) that there is >50% cloudcover to contend with. Are those breaks going to be enough to allow for the instability necessary to fire off severe later this afternoon? At the moment, my location is locked in with wall to wall overcast skies.

it should clear out. Im not sure how thick the clouds are but it could be a lot of low clouds which should burn off once the sun gets higher in the sky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There appears to be some breaks in the "overcast" this morning over central PA, however it still looks (on the visible image) that there is >50% cloudcover to contend with. Are those breaks going to be enough to allow for the instability necessary to fire off severe later this afternoon? At the moment, my location is locked in with wall to wall overcast skies.

Addressed in the most recent Disco BREAKS IN THE CLOUDS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE MOIST BOUNDARY LAYER SHOULD YIELD A MODERATELY UNSTABLE ENVIRONMENT BY AFTERNOON WITH MLCAPE RANGING FROM AROUND 1000 J/KG OVER NRN PORTION OF MODERATE RISK AREA...TO 1500-2000 J/KG IN THE SOUTH. WHEN COUPLED WITH 50-60 KT OF DEEP-LAYER SHEAR...SETUP WILL SUPPORT EMBEDDED BOWING/LEWP STRUCTURES AND SUPERCELLS. THE OVERALL SYNOPTIC PATTERN SUGGESTS THE POTENTIAL FOR A SERIAL-TYPE DERECHO EVENT...CHARACTERIZED BY WIDESPREAD AND SIGNIFICANT DAMAGING WINDS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it should clear out. Im not sure how thick the clouds are but it could be a lot of low clouds which should burn off once the sun gets higher in the sky.

Thanks Tom. I was wondering about the cloud thickness as well.

Not the "D" word! Wait until media outlets get a hold of that.

Oh boy...

Hopefully they miss that part of the discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sun popping out here intermittently now, but still generally overcast. As for that line, it's narrow for sure, and has a lot of lighter rain ahead of it. Watching radar animations, though, it "appears" to be moving eastward faster than the overall rain shield. What significance that has though, I don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am completely underwhelmed by the line over western/central PA.

I think the MD in Central PA sums up what is expected to happen at this point.

DISCUSSION...A NARROW BUT LONG BAND OF ENHANCED REFLECTIVITY WITHOUT

CG DETECTED LIGHTNING EXTENDED FROM SWRN NY TO ERN KY AS OF

1530Z...ALONG THE SURFACE COLD FRONT. AN 80-100 MILE GAP REMAINS

BETWEEN THIS AND THE LEADING EDGE OF MORE ROBUST SURFACE HEATING

WHERE 15Z TEMPERATURES HAD RISEN THROUGH THE 70S AND LOWER 80S. AS

THE FRONT MERGES WITH THIS INSTABILITY AXIS...A SUBSTANTIAL INCREASE

IN CONVECTIVE INTENSITY IS ANTICIPATED. LOW/DEEP-LAYER SHEAR WILL BE

STRONGEST WITH NRN EXTENT...WHILE STRONGER HEATING WITH SRN EXTENT

SHOULD PROMOTE RELATIVELY GREATER BUOYANCY. THIS SETUP APPEARS TO BE

SUPPORTIVE FOR THE ADVERTISED POTENTIAL OF SCATTERED TO NUMEROUS

DAMAGING WIND EVENTS. A FEW EMBEDDED QLCS TORNADOES ALSO APPEAR

PROBABLE ACROSS CNTRL/ERN NY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...