Jump to content

brooklynwx99

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    5,651
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by brooklynwx99

  1. yeah, the PDO can be unfavorable for a long period of time regardless of ENSO... hence the Decadal part of it haha there's really just no way to be sure right now
  2. I personally think the 2018-19 Nino was just a weak, weird one in a Nina base state. it sucked, but I'm not sure much more can be said about it. you're gonna have strange ones in a sample that big... same can be said for 2010-11, which was a strong Nina but was prolific over a good portion of the NE
  3. let's keep it simple here are all the weak-moderate Ninos since 1950: here are all the weak-moderate Ninas in the same timeframe: Ninos far and away present the possibility for a great pattern. let's just root for one next year
  4. lmao now we're getting into whether Ninos lead to +PNAs anymore? come on. the tropical forcing is in a different spot and encourages the Aleutian ridging that we see in Ninas to move farther E. this is also why "good" MJO phases often occur more in Ninos, since they positively feed back... instead of in Ninas where the waves suddenly die once close to Phase 8
  5. definitely less suppressive than 00z. TPV isn't as far SE and the 250mb jet is more poleward. S/W is a touch less amped, but I think those changes will lead to a net positive this run in terms of avoiding a squashed system
  6. might not do it this run, but the ECMWF is worlds better than the GFS
  7. ECMWF doesn't look like it'll be as suppressed as the GFS with the second wave more amplified wave and more downstream ridging
  8. FWIW the GEPS disagrees with the CMC and actually looks decent with the second wave. let's see what the ECMWF / EPS think in a bit
  9. it's more of a lack of amplification for the third wave. a stronger wave would bring in more of the cold air due to the stronger northerly flow while a weak wave only skirts it and keeps the airmass marginal. it's not an airmass issue
  10. i know that the off runs are supposed to be just as accurate as the 00/12z runs, but I can’t even tell you how many times I see crap like this
  11. the GFS keeps amping the vort up for the second wave… let’s see how it turns out
  12. ha, the stronger NS in the end actually leads to a stronger first wave. more energy just gets sheared out rooting against this evolution, definitely a lower ceiling
  13. FWIW the ICON should be improved with the second wave. less initial stream interaction and a stronger vort
  14. GEFS is more held back with the second wave. better looking 250mb jet too
  15. if there was one place i’d want to see the GFS at this range, it would be here. still way too progressive
  16. 250mb jet is stronger and more favorably oriented compared to 12z
  17. this is a nice look with the strong southern stream shortwave and confluence in place
  18. storm cancel jk I would actually be worried about suppression rather than a cutter with the TPV in that spot
  19. GEFS is on the right track for the first wave. both colder and wetter
  20. this is nice from the GEFS. better ridging showing up out west and lower heights initially. it'll be easier to snow from that first wave if the SE ridge is pressed a bit
  21. the reason why this cuts is because of a late phase with a vort coming onto the WC. if this is a phantom vort or is just like 12-24 hours slower, this is a monster storm. I'll consider this a good run
  22. Oh Canada? edit: it does phase at the end, but this is still a very intriguing setup
×
×
  • Create New...