Jump to content

NorthArlington101

Members
  • Posts

    10,979
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by NorthArlington101

  1. I respect the snow depth map as a “worst case” scenario. With 33 and ripping… it’s not gonna have any trouble stacking up. We did fine with much much less on Dec. 10 earlier in the year.
  2. https://x.com/burgwx/status/1741867069488890044?s=46&t=YRAxGyE8QLsoshMtJniktg
  3. Tomer Berg said something to that effect on Twitter earlier IIRC
  4. Ah, my bad. At this range I prefer the snowiest snow map anyway
  5. Pretty classic RA/SN gradient but verbatim DC is fine through 135 Surface temps not technically cooperating but upper levels are
  6. Must be a temp problem because it's naso good until you get out into the burbs. 6-8"+ your way. realize nj2 said this earlier
  7. Just visualized what you said - don't drop below 0c 850.
  8. It may be semantics, but for a storm without "HECS" upside, I see a few HECS (my definition at least - zones of 18"+) in the GEFS.
  9. about how many hours out would you recommend tracking geese migrations?
  10. Verbatim the GFS snow depth map is ugly for the cities - at least compared 10:1. Buuuutt I recall the December storm where ground temps sucked and rates + darkness overcame. If we start overnight and it's as heavy as the winning runs have been I think the max upside isn't a difficult reach. Expect 2" and some slop and most of us will probably be happy though
  11. Posting an unfinished run snowmap to scare people, smh. @ji better? Psu fringed, but I’d wager he’d come in and say the surface depiction was wrong
  12. Faster the better. Fewer runs between now and Valhalla
×
×
  • Create New...