Typhoon Tip

Where's Brian ? - we need to petition him to institute a limitation on the use of the word Blizzard - I don't care how fascist it is to limit free speech, at some point we gotta throw hands

Agreed

Yeah I am not inclined to think a New Jersey model bomb/Miller B is type favored given the totality of all guidance sources but native to that one particular model solution? -actually in the process of slowing or decelerating everywhere really quickly in a day or two leading to that … it’s probably just model hallucination but if you wanted to get a big dog done that’s how you do it by the way… The GFS trended pretty heavy for that 7.8.9 heh hadn’t looked. That’s probably already almost thread worthy considering a large consortium of our subform lives in Central -northern New England I’m also a little biased in favor of that event because it’s something I saw like six days ago frankly I think I mentioned it back then so so much for self promotion ha ha Overall I’d say this GFS run is the most representative of the pattern forcing and having a polar jet punch further south across astern North America over prior runs. It’s interesting to see the operational runs finally conceding to the weight of their ensemble means assumption we might’ve almost been able to make considering every single family were saying the same thing

Yeah it is too bad that is at the tail end of that run because that is setting up a monster - I mean if one’s into that sort of thing … haha. yeah that wave diving south of Chicago‘s got a no chance other than the closing off with that look and it’s going to be doing it under a fresh ambient baroclinicity and a ton of cold air - I can tell that without even looking at the other charts, and if the other charts don’t have it their wrong. so there. Lol

I still think 7.8.9 can trend I also lean more 13.14.15 than I do 20th. But obviously that’s just where we sit now and trends up to this point… Everything together and techniques in mind -all that. I reserve the right to modulate. I think we are going to have to conserve some progression in the flow so anything that’s a model on a given day probably moves up in time so I understand the tastiness of the 17th of the month but I just think if there’s something real around then, which I’m inclined to think there is, it’s likely to get bumped up by a day or two. And I agree that flatter faster systems while we slip stream

It’s an interesting duality there… In one hand it’s very doubtful that we’re breaking the December single month snowfall records-although we can hope right? But on the other hand it’s definitely quite viable that that specific region of Northeast or mass where you live gets totally b-f*ed. Just as a wise gambler…

The world ends on that day. The billionaires are already heading to their top secret enclaves to wait it out. Appears an extra terrestrial event is going to happen that surpasses Carrington by perhaps a factor of 5.

Yep… I spoke about that earlier that exact same aspect because of the differentiating mass fields the correction factor is likely pointed south , i.e colder solution either way

Nasty mix after an initial snow burst.

Rumor has it ‘competence’ is the main objective …

Absolutely… But again, I was just speaking to the general readers and education point not to be swept away by that look without considering it - that’s all. I mean the circumstance of compression and wind howling and all that stuff and hoping that it relaxes a little and allows those stream interactions and stuff to happen… The fact the matter is we don’t know if that’s going to end up that way in a lot of what goes on in here lol it’s just psychology management ha ha ha but if people are prepared then there’s less of that jilted sense I guess. Umm actually no… Because as history of social media dynamics had repeatedly shown … we can set that table with Ming Dynasty elegant anf people will still eat on the floor and get all pissed off anyway… Kidding .. a little. But like I said it’s also not a showstopper… Compression can neg interfere …more likely in the big dog scenarios. We can also end up with overrunning typology. We’ve seen big results happen from seemingly innocuous flat wave events too. I mean we can also get into the abstraction of climate change and higher pwat that cause systems to act weird - the list is endless if you want to start drilling in. I think the psychology in here would be managed well enough in a nickel and dime result. Yup. You’re right about the relaxation. In fact when I look at all the biggest ones in history (except maybe 1993 super storm which is more like an atmospheric rogue wave…), they happen when the basic geometric pattern shape of the flow was in place but you didn’t have a berserker amount of gradient between the trough and the ridge nodes. It all comes down to baseline velocity versus exit —>entry velocity’s in short waves embedded

Agreed … I’ve been impressed with ‘scalar’ analogue. fwtw It’s a revolving door thing as you hint tho. Depends on timing the noise within … which ultimately decided system typology

The only problem I see there is whether or not the ‘neutral’ height field departures in the SE are just an artifact of the flow compression - you know this … I’m just mentioning for the general reader. If so … those neutral layers in the TV are misrepresenting a destructive interference pattern. Insidiously, too, as it sort of hides under cloak of otherwise impressionable features -but the screaming velocities that result are not being represented. It’s not a show stopper … just an aspect to bear in mind. Anomalies don’t describe “why” they exist … it could be normal hgts because cold hgts are compressing S … but compression absorbs S/Ws.

Keep in mind … the COD is a weakened state …. It’s exertion in terms of forcing wave mechanical dispersion/modulation downstream drops below the forcing of the westerlies and becomes lower correlative. In other words … phase 8.1.2 migrations while within the COD do not represent in the pattern very well.

It’s good speculation but the reason the MJO has been reproducing that same behavior of collapsing into to the COD astride the 7/8 quadrants of the RMM has more to do with the wave attempting to move out of the marine continent … straight into a headlong -ENSO circulation footprint. And not being strong enough … it loses out within that destructive tension. Notice the wave seems to briefly amplify in 7s? Anology is a wave rearing up nearing the shore Phase 8 —> 1..2 is actually a constructive interference wrt the -AO should it succeed. It destabilizes the AA phase of the N PAC Basin … triggering tendencies for wave migration into higher latitudes which proceeds blocking events.

Interestingly… The ensuing 0Z operational Gfs was - imo – largely improved over priors in terms of actually representing some of the forcing we’ve been collectively observing in the ensembles for the past week. Pretty much one of the first ones I’ve seen actually do that… I’d also watch 7.8.9.in addition to 13.14.15 Those two intervals have been there pretty much all the while in spite of all the modeled din and fractal efforts to hide them it in the noise. It’s understandable for the midmonth. Christ, talking about at the 300+ range I think the 8th has a chance to be a flat, minoring event with option for more should a GGEM -like solution pass under our latitude. Low levels in either GGEM or Euro option look cold due to low level thickness wedging off erstwhile -EPO passing over recent improvements in cryosphere in Canada The Canadian has a deep vortex coming overhead and deepening further at 500 mbar, pinning under the -NAO … which this latter aspect is shown some remarkable residence/continuity for a long while as we all know by now. The 8th period of time is over 7 days away so there’s time for that to modulate into a little bit more of a concern. Not a leap to tell winter enthusiast an opportunity to monitor. It’s really the inflection in the index modal change in the NAO. Which has admittedly a lower but still above N/S correlation with activity over the eastern mid latitudes of the continent for a reason. 0ZGFS has the 8th system passage but it seems to be responding to NAO forcing later than the other two guidance types and that -assuming causality - allows it to sneak west through the Detroit transit The folks that are seeking big dogs it’s more likely the event between the 13th and 15th evolves that way imo from what I’ve been seeing lately. Bearing in mind … in this context that is like I don’t know the difference between 10% above climo vs 20% above climo… because it’s just too far out in time. Definitely fits the larger hemispheric timing and cadence tho. Interesting.

I mentioned that two days ago and I mentioned something similar today the EPO was being kind of stingy in this thing… Seems to be abandoning the guidance - last week there was more of that with resulting -30 C 850 plume down to southern Manitoba … so yeah that’s a change in the last three days. That also changes the landscape of this thing. I mean NAO blocks are less useful if they don’t have cold air directed underneath. Once again the models charming us with day 12 delusional grandeur … lol j/k …sort of

0Z NAM in just 12 hrs takes the hydrostatic hgts from 553 to 519! Thats helluva a front

It’s interesting how these ens means keep upping the ante but the operational versions meander.

Ugly Euro run. Lots going wrong around the -NAO … it’s kind of interesting, the one metric that more typically demos poor predictability is the one observable aspect that’s showing any continuity.

… It’s an evolving situation… I consider that Lakes cutter around the 7th as a boundary storm along the mode change / mainly -EPO driven … a transit that last week looked like a positive +PNAP triggered passage. But the PNAP aspect’s been delayed possibly indefinitely I’m not sure… I mean whether we get a western North American Ridge and all that jazz thereafter is still under debate to me but yeah it’s been showing up in some of the guidance. It’s nice to finally see the operational guidance versions of the Euro and the American coming around to picking up the exertion of the negative NAO. Man it’s unnerving tho … The NAO history is a catalogue of disappointments … when it looked clad, but then never really developed and/or ended up doing some variation that didn’t parlay well. And so here we are trying to depend on one that’s still modeled beyond day 7 …particularly towards mid month that’ll stroke winter enthusiasts some 4 weeks ahead of climo no less. There is a little solace in the fact that when you step back and look at it from orbit the hemisphere appears that it has no choice but to end up in a negative NAO. I’m just hoping that model magnification will actually be our ally in this case and that what verifies is a more moderate negative NAO blocking …such that doesn’t become overbearing

Nice cold cap out there this morning. Dropped to 22 then the clouds came over right at dawn and now it’s mid morning with heavy frost everywhere…

mm ...I think the 13/14th is lit up some in the ensembles ( about a 1/3 of them) for a reason, too. Not sure about the 17th -20th, but the period between the 10th and Christmas in general appears vulnerable for activity. Suppressed ambient polar boundary pressed into heights lingering modestly positive in the deep south, yeah... an index modal change drawing the mid levels back N over that boundary in the means is quintessential H.A. There was that in the 7th...9th but it seems to be correcting further out in time. We've been discussing elsewhere ... but moving an along an event spectrum from cutter --> overrunning --> more formulaic coastal spanning 10 days to two weeks mid month, isn't a bad idea. Even if one of those verifies..

I'm not a geologist - though have side-carred a lot of interest my whole life ... I'm under the impression that the subaqueous nature of the eruption is at least partial in why the S02 was low? - compared to eruptions having less energy, such as Pinatubo ... with less VEI but was richer in S02. (these are not statements; these are rhetorical questions)

You haven't mentioned anything terribly distracting ... I mean, whether you are right or wrong regarding NAO blocks merging with winter killing STRs is really 'sides the main value of the point: NAOs are inherently poorly performed and stochastic index fields.... Modeled blocks and/or decaying thereof, are often proven to be red herrings. That's the take away. 'don't count NAO chickens before they hatch" As far as getting this block to initially verify ... I think it's above medium confidence, personally... I'm seeing the scaffolding at planetary scales that are directive in this case. If I had to put money on it, I'd say we'd see a system materialize for the 13th of the month... but I wouldn't be surprised if a flat mix headache happened a bit sooner. Before then, we are social media booked with therapy appointments LOL