Jump to content

87storms

Members
  • Posts

    6,613
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 87storms

  1. jan 2010 definitely springs to mind radar-wise with this one being further north, at least the waa portion... https://mesonet.agron.iastate.edu/current/mcview.phtml?prod=usrad&java=script&mode=archive&frames=60&interval=60&year=2010&month=1&day=29&hour=0&minute=0 wildcard is what it does along the coast, i guess.
  2. feb 6-7, 2003 sort of reminds me of this one...not exact, but maybe a further south version of that one, which also had temps to work with and layed down an easy 5-6". more of a coastal impact with that system, but i think boom is possible if we can get into a moderate band for a couple hours.
  3. i spoke too early. dammit, i try not to do that now, too. this is definitely a better run. i guess there's more coastal impact now. healthy, healthy run for md/va.
  4. it looks a little more consolidated for areas that were already primed like va/md. if anything, maybe a bit of a better run. it's game on. almost near nowcasting time.
  5. nam looks like a hold so far. i don't see much change. maybe a bit better than 12z for areas south and east.
  6. i don't think a lot has changed since yesterday. the same general idea on 12z applies...there's clues as to how this could boom and there's clues as to how this could bust. we need the first part of this storm to verify and/or the coastal to be further north and not get punted ots so easily by that stout high funneling in from the GL. we should know more by monday morning.
  7. it is. i'm a little concerned about having such a strong high beelining to the southeast like that, but if the front end stuff is as depicted, then it's game on. also...just checked gfs for next weekend...intriguing.
  8. it's a pretty flat look. the storm doesn't gain enough latitude and there's really nothing that keeps it from shooting ots. gonna need everything to be further north, but 500 isn't inspiring at all. at least we have temps on our side, so any scraps from the first part should stick.
  9. yup, that's what mine was. was unpleasant, to say the least. felt like a classic stomach flu, but the quick duration was odd, so maybe it was the norovirus.
  10. not gonna lie, i feel like this storm has some decent bust potential. upper levels are pretty foul, at least when comparing to the systems that do well here. boom scenario would be coastal impacts. bust would be stuck in no man's land during the coastal transfer. wouldn't surprise me if that initial WAA gets mangled on approach since we're talking about a fairly strung out system, but i hope i'm wrong because i'm ready for some snow.
  11. that might have been what i had a couple years ago (winter time). awful stomach bug for a day and then was pretty much fully recovered by the next day.
  12. one thing i like is that daytime (or midday) sunday (estimating here) looks to be when the better stuff arrives.
  13. lol, but it does look good though until crosses the mountains, which could argue for that typical north nudge. i'd like to see the euro hold.
  14. goal posts are narrowing on a md and/or va special. tbd on whether this nudges north some. it's a slightly better run than 18z for dc proper.
  15. As others have said, 500 ain’t pretty. We don’t want a system weakening or “pancaking” upon approach. That’s a story we’ve seen play out before. I’d like to see a north shift with this to be on the safe side.
  16. Temps are easy with this one. Nice to not have to worry about that aspect. And it’s also nice to have the euro on our side.
  17. qpf output for fv3 didn't seem too great, though better than cmc/gfs. 12z canadian matches up with 18z gfs. we could use a bit of a north shift amongst those models.
  18. wondering if this is turning into a boom (warning level) or bust (scraps) situation as opposed to a middle of the road light event. if we're talking a system weakening on approach entering a dry environment, that could pose some problems on the leeward side. however, if we have enough lift/energy/onshore flow, then it's going to lay down some good ratios over a 6 hr period, enough to probably easily reach warning level criteria. i guess i'm not all in on a long duration light event because we don't see that often.
  19. i like the placement of it, but it needs to be weaker than modeled. not sure how much i buy the high barreling down like it's showing. in other news, for those not in the obs thread, snow showers incoming? just got kinda gray out.
  20. looks like there's going to be a tight gradient with that high pressing down. i think as long as the wave is legit and doesn't shear/dry out, then we can overperform with the temps. dc is even modeled to be at or below freezing and we have a couple of cold days leading up to it. and it might be an overnighter, or at least the initial portion. hope that coastal is a bit further north/west than modeled, though. would like to see the surface low 50 miles north to get into a real nice event... https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=gfs&region=us&pkg=z850_vort&runtime=2019010912&fh=108
  21. the 500 setup is meh for a big event, but if we can get just enough lift with these temps, then this is an easy 1-3/2-4" system which is a helluva lot better than what we've had so far this winter, minus the nov storm which wasn't really all that to begin with (was just fun because it was november). we're due for powder.
  22. Need a juicy wave for this. We know what the Apps can do to storms here. I don’t like the idea of a long duration light event. That’s not what we do well, in general, but maybe this is just one of those setups that’ll do that.
  23. this is how we get our colorado powder. gotta walk that line of suppression vs juiced up enough system when we have a strong high to the north. would be pretty cool if this system is like our rainers, because those had plenty of moisture the last few months.
×
×
  • Create New...