Jump to content

bluewave

Members
  • Posts

    35,982
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by bluewave

  1. Nice to see the 12z CMC finally come on board with a more NW phase and closer to coast surface low. https://weather.gc.ca/model_forecast/global_e.html
  2. There hasn’t been any correlation with the NAO from one month to the other with how wild the swings have become in recent years between highs and lows.
  3. We are making some small progress. An actual strong -NAO pattern not linking with the Southeast ridge for a change. I will be happy if we can at least get a few of these during the winter to make things more interesting than the several winters. But it has been easier to do more in the off season recently.
  4. We can say one thing for sure. The cutoff is now so deep on the EPS near the East Coast, that the trough axis stays along the East Coast next few weeks. So it does look like this past week will turn out to be the warmest of this whole month. So it’s possible that instead of 80s the warmest next few weeks is 70s with multiple days in the 60s.
  5. I was happy for you guys back in 2009-2010 even though the jackpot that winter was to my south. You were able to get that outcome due to how cold the CONUS was that winter. Needed the 27th coldest CONUS winter at 30.70° to get such heavy snows a far south as the DC to Philly metros. Since the big shift warmer in 2015-2016, this last 2024-2025 relatively colder winter was 34.05° and the 27th warmest. So a colder winter during the post 1994-2015 snowy era was much warmer than a cold winter back in that era. The fall patterns were precursors to both winters. October 2009 was the 4th coldest winter since 1895 for the CONUS. October 2024 was the 2nd warmest on record. So another metric of how much warmer the climate across the seasons has warmed since 2015-2016.
  6. Yeah, a subtropical or hybrid structure.
  7. Yeah, we used to have the old Alden Difax machine back at college in the mid 80s. Sometimes we would come into the weather lab after the weekend and all the maps would be stuck inside. Even when the machine was working correctly, the model graphics weren’t very high detail.
  8. https://weather.gc.ca/mainmenu/modelling_menu_e.html
  9. The 12z Canadian is only showing up on the official site and is still OTS.
  10. Seems like the vorts will need to phase further NW in order for the low to come further north like today. If the vorts phase further south, then it will take the low OTS. This is why earlier runs were more OTS. We’ll need a few more runs like today in order to have some confidence in the wetter scenarios. I don’t think we have seen a phasing scenario work in our favor in quite some time.
  11. Just goes to show what a little elevation and distance west of the I-95 corridor can do.
  12. That’s definitely not my intention. It’s just that this new and larger temperature jump in 2023-2024 is so new. We know that in the 8 year period 2015-2016 to 2022-2023 with the higher baseline temperature the ceiling at Boston was 59.9” and NYC maxed out at 40.9”. So we are all probably just taking educated guesses at to what the new ceiling at these even warmer levels will be. All we know for sure is that the most recent 7 year running average along the I-95 corridor is the lowest on record for the combined station average.
  13. I don’t understand why anyone will come on these forums and openly mock anyone for having the courage to post long range ideas like we do here. While we may disagree from time to time, I have respect for anyone willing to make the effort of presenting their ideas. Another issue is that these temperature jumps have been occurring more frequently. So we had a longer period from 1993 to 2015 when we had similar background conditions responsible for the record seasonal snows. The more recent jump from 2015-2016 only lasted until 2024-2025 when another steep background temperature rise occurred. So it’s uncertain how much longer until we get at this new baseline before we see another big rise again. Not even sure if when I give a ceiling like 55” to 85” at Boston that this period will last long enough for something in the 70” to 85” to be even possible. Since the shorter number of years at each regime level may not allow enough time for the full temperature range to occur.
  14. I am not sure if we will be able to forecast a season like that in advance though. It could just pop up after all the seasonal forecasts have been issued during the fall. Sometimes all it takes is one event finding the BM track and a few follow up storms behind it. But I don’t know when we could see another at least 1 month excursion like January 2022 with the brief return of the BM tracks. If we had a few more weeks of that pattern maybe Boston could have done 60-70”. Hard to say for sure.
  15. I left a pretty generous possible ceiling in the 55” to 85” range going forward for Boston. For NYC Central Park I a going for a ceiling under 50”. So even if we don’t see a repeat of the 1993 to 2015 era, there could still be good snowfall outcomes to be had from time to time at some point in the future. Plus the areas to the NW of the DC to Boston I-95 corridor have a higher ceiling than the NYC and Boston proper areas since they are colder and at higher elevations.
  16. I never said that. I know that you are probably in a rush. But just go back and look at my posts made yesterday.
  17. Exactly. The great thing about this forum is that everyone can come on and discuss their ideas. I enjoy reading your posts and wouldn’t want you to stop posting.
  18. New all-time October high of 83° set up at Caribou and several locations in Canada. Time Series Summary for Caribou Area, ME (ThreadEx) - Month of Oct Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending. 1 2025 83 25 2 2011 82 0 3 2023 79 0 - 2017 79 0 - 2005 79 0 - 1968 79 0 - 1947 79 0 4 1983 78 0 - 1970 78 0 5 2024 77 0 - 2021 77 0 - 2002 77 0 - 2001 77 0 - 1979 77 0 - 1950 77 0 - 1946 77 0
  19. Water conservation measures announced in some localities as the reservoir levels get down to 70%. This has been a top 10 driest fall to fall period across the region. Nantucket has been one of the driest spots with the coastal storms getting suppressed to our south. https://www.wfsb.com/2025/10/03/bristol-mayor-announces-water-restrictions-amid-drought/?outputType=amp
  20. We usually don’t get two mismatch La Niña years in a row. So I wasn’t expecting another one this year. Plus the ACE usually declines in the following years from peak seasons like last year which went 161.
  21. So far we are getting the weaker October MJO 5-6 amplitude from the available forecasts. This is similar to 16-17, 21-22, and 22-23. Last October was the stronger amplitude like 20-21 and 17-18. So we got the much stronger +PNA mismatch from those winters. So the early indicators are this winter will be warmer than last winter was with a weaker PNA than last winter. But there could still be +PNA intervals. Snowfall is tricky since the snowfall was so low anyway last winter. So I don’t have a clear signal yet whether the smowfall will be below, similar to or above last winter. I will refine the snowfall forecast once we see what happens in December. If the areas around NYC are below 4” again like last years December La Niña, then it will be another below average season. The lower ACE this year is also following what we experienced in 2016, 2021, and 2022. Meaning that there was a step down following the higher ACE years like we saw in 2024, 2020, and 2017.
  22. The 1976-1977 winter was a weaker reflection of that one. But it’s still the coldest winter that I have ever experienced. Waiting for the school bus at 7:45 am with temps near 0° and strong winds was a memorable experience. https://www.facebook.com/greaterlongisland/posts/the-great-south-bay-frozen-circa-1976-1977-️-who-remembers-when-you-could-drive-/979944926830556/
  23. There is some data going back to 1779-1780 when we had over 95” here on the CT Shoreline. . The cold and snow that winter set the benchmark for coldest winter of the last several hundred years. So the 1995-1996 winter was only the snowiest in modern times. https://www.nps.gov/morr/learn/historyculture/hard-winter-news.htm William Smith (a loyalist living in New York City) records in his diary that on January 16, 1780, people were walking across the frozen Hudson River from New York to Paulus Hook (today Jersey City) New Jersey. A Hessian soldier, Johann Dohla recorded in his diary on January 30, "The North (Hudson) and East rivers are frozen solid. The ice was checked and found to be eighteen feet thick. All ships were frozen in, and it was possible to cross over the North (Hudson) River on foot, riding or driving, without fear." Later, (on February 22) Dohla wrote "Today the North River ice began to break, after having been frozen for nearly seven weeks." A German officer, Major Baurmeister wrote, "The severe winter covered the North River with ice early in January; even where the current of the river is swiftest, the ice was eleven feet thick, in spire of the fact that it is 1800 yards wide between Fort George (today Battery Park, New York City) and Powles Hook." February 1780 seems to have been even colder: On February 10, William Smith mentions in his diary that a few days earlier a "24 Pounder" (that is, a cannon that fired a solid ball weighing 24 pounds - the entire cannon weighed three tons) was rolled across the Hudson River to Paulus Hook (today part of Jersey City, New Jersey.) Smith goes on to say that even a heavy load as this it made no impression on the ice. On the night of February 10th, Smith heard that four to five hundred British cavalry rode their horses across the river. MANY ACCOUNTS MENTION UNPRECEDENTED CONDITIONS A teacher in Yale College (New Haven, Connecticut) recorded approximately twenty days with snowfall, and a total of 95 inches of snow that winter. People walked across the Sound from Stanford, Connecticut to Long Island. Others walked from Rhode Island mainland to Block Island. Chesapeake Bay and the York River in Virginia froze over for the first time since Europeans settled there. Many people mentioned in letters that they could not remember a winter as bad.
  24. What has happened since 15-16 with the general warming and 18-19 for the warmer storm tracks is not a cycle. It’s a direct shift related to the expansion of the subtropical ridging. This has lead to vast swaths of record SSTs is the mid-latitudes. A farther north storm track than we used to get. So it’s natural in such a pattern for areas that end up south of the dominant storm tracks to experience less snow than we used to get. We have been experiencing a series of gradual shifts since the early 1980s. But the shift that has occurred over the last decade has been the most dramatic. People expect gradual linear shifts when it comes to weather. But the climate system produces non-linear jumps once a certain temperature threshold have been crossed. This new study really isn’t a surprise given the rapid warming of SSTs in North Pacific. But it’s good to see this new attribution technique correct the climate model errors. Similar shift in the North Atlantic so rapidly warming the climate leads to more persistent -PDO and +AMO patterns. https://www.colorado.edu/today/2025/08/14/human-emissions-drove-megadrought-western-us Greenhouse gas and aerosol emissions from human activity have been driving the prolonged drought in the western United States through a complicated connection with the Pacific Ocean, according to a new CU Boulder-led study. For more than two decades, an extreme dry spell has drained the Colorado River, devastated local farms, and intensified wildfires across the American Southwest. The new prediction, published August 13 in Nature, could help water managers region develop better water use plans or invest in infrastructure accordingly, with relief potentially still decades away. “Our results show that the drought and ocean patterns we’re seeing today are not just natural fluctuations—they’re largely driven by human activity,” said Jeremy Klavans, postdoctoral researcher in CU Boulder’s Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences and lead author of the study. Worst drought in 12 centuries The drought hitting the Colorado River Basin states and California is directly linked to a climate pattern of the north Pacific Ocean, known as the Pacific decadal oscillation (PDO). The PDO is a natural fluctuation of the Pacific that waxes and wanes every two decades or so. In its positive phase, waters in the eastern Pacific Ocean along the U.S. West Coast tend to be warmer, whereas waters near Japan are colder. In its negative phase, the pattern flips, bringing cold water to the eastern Pacific. Since the 1990s, the PDO has been stuck in a negative phase, an unusually long stretch for a typical cycle, Klavans said. That has had profound impacts on the United States. The cold air and water along the U.S. West Coast hold less moisture than warm air, causing a reduction in precipitation. This extended cool phase also pushed storms that would have brought water to the region farther north. As a result, scientists estimated that about 93% of the western United States is experiencing drought, with 70% facing severe dry conditions. Prior studies have shown that the past two decades have been the driest in the American Southwest in at least 1,200 years. Scientists had long thought that the PDO was entirely determined by natural forces, such as the heat exchanges between the ocean and the air. Even the latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a body of experts convened by the United Nations, said the PDO is controlled by natural forces with high confidence. If that theory was correct, the PDO should have flipped from negative to positive in 2015 after a strong El Niño event warmed the Pacific. Instead, the PDO shifted positive for a short time following the El Niño before reverting to the negative phase again. New reality To understand why the PDO has been stuck, Klavans and his team used a large collection of climate simulation programs to predict what would happen in the future. Using a new suite of over 570 simulations, the team found that between 1870 and 1950, changes in the PDO were almost entirely driven by internal forces. But since the mid-20th century, greenhouse gas and aerosol emissions have accounted for more than half of the variations in the PDO. The team discovered that existing climate models tend to overestimate the role of internal factors on the PDO while underestimating the influence of external factors, such as emissions. After correcting the imbalance, the team found that emissions, and their impacts on the PDO, have been responsible for nearly all of the precipitation decline in the western United States over the past three decades. “People have been trying for a long time to find out why this part of the country is so dry, and we have an answer for that finally,” Klavans said. Because the same imbalance has been shown in other regions, Klavans said the study’s implications could go far beyond the Pacific. For example, the North Atlantic Oscillation, a similar fluctuation over the Atlantic Ocean, is driving drought in places like Spain. He added that improving climate models to capture the role of external forces could help scientists predict future changes in precipitation across the globe. As for the American Southwest, the outlook is grim. If greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise, the PDO will likely remain in its negative phase, and the drought will persist for at least the next three decades, Klavans said. “With this information, water planners could set new expectations and make proper investments in water infrastructure now, knowing this drought is here to stay,” Klavans said. For example, some Californian cities are already building desalination plants to turn seawater into drinking water. “This study can allow us to better quantify the costs of continued greenhouse gas emissions for Americans,” Klavans said. “That can only help our region plan for a better future.” https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09368-2 This anthropogenic influence was previously undetected because the current generation of climate models systematically underestimate the amplitude of forced climate variability. A new attribution technique that statistically corrects for this error suggests that observed PDO impacts—including the ongoing multidecadal drought in the western United States—can be largely attributed to human activity through externally forced changes in the PDO. These results indicate that we need to rethink the attribution and projection of multidecadal climate. https://www.colorado.edu/today/2025/08/14/human-emissions-drove-megadrought-western-us Greenhouse gas and aerosol emissions from human activity have been driving the prolonged drought in the western United States through a complicated connection with the Pacific Ocean, according to a new CU Boulder-led study. For more than two decades, an extreme dry spell has drained the Colorado River, devastated local farms, and intensified wildfires across the American Southwest. The new prediction, published August 13 in Nature, could help water managers region develop better water use plans or invest in infrastructure accordingly, with relief potentially still decades away. “Our results show that the drought and ocean patterns we’re seeing today are not just natural fluctuations—they’re largely driven by human activity,” said Jeremy Klavans, postdoctoral researcher in CU Boulder’s Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences and lead author of the study. Worst drought in 12 centuries The drought hitting the Colorado River Basin states and California is directly linked to a climate pattern of the north Pacific Ocean, known as the Pacific decadal oscillation (PDO). The PDO is a natural fluctuation of the Pacific that waxes and wanes every two decades or so. In its positive phase, waters in the eastern Pacific Ocean along the U.S. West Coast tend to be warmer, whereas waters near Japan are colder. In its negative phase, the pattern flips, bringing cold water to the eastern Pacific. Since the 1990s, the PDO has been stuck in a negative phase, an unusually long stretch for a typical cycle, Klavans said. That has had profound impacts on the United States. The cold air and water along the U.S. West Coast hold less moisture than warm air, causing a reduction in precipitation. This extended cool phase also pushed storms that would have brought water to the region farther north. As a result, scientists estimated that about 93% of the western United States is experiencing drought, with 70% facing severe dry conditions. Prior studies have shown that the past two decades have been the driest in the American Southwest in at least 1,200 years. Scientists had long thought that the PDO was entirely determined by natural forces, such as the heat exchanges between the ocean and the air. Even the latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a body of experts convened by the United Nations, said the PDO is controlled by natural forces with high confidence. If that theory was correct, the PDO should have flipped from negative to positive in 2015 after a strong El Niño event warmed the Pacific. Instead, the PDO shifted positive for a short time following the El Niño before reverting to the negative phase again. New reality To understand why the PDO has been stuck, Klavans and his team used a large collection of climate simulation programs to predict what would happen in the future. Using a new suite of over 570 simulations, the team found that between 1870 and 1950, changes in the PDO were almost entirely driven by internal forces. But since the mid-20th century, greenhouse gas and aerosol emissions have accounted for more than half of the variations in the PDO. The team discovered that existing climate models tend to overestimate the role of internal factors on the PDO while underestimating the influence of external factors, such as emissions. After correcting the imbalance, the team found that emissions, and their impacts on the PDO, have been responsible for nearly all of the precipitation decline in the western United States over the past three decades. “People have been trying for a long time to find out why this part of the country is so dry, and we have an answer for that finally,” Klavans said. Because the same imbalance has been shown in other regions, Klavans said the study’s implications could go far beyond the Pacific. For example, the North Atlantic Oscillation, a similar fluctuation over the Atlantic Ocean, is driving drought in places like Spain. He added that improving climate models to capture the role of external forces could help scientists predict future changes in precipitation across the globe. As for the American Southwest, the outlook is grim. If greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise, the PDO will likely remain in its negative phase, and the drought will persist for at least the next three decades, Klavans said. “With this information, water planners could set new expectations and make proper investments in water infrastructure now, knowing this drought is here to stay,” Klavans said. For example, some Californian cities are already building desalination plants to turn seawater into drinking water. “This study can allow us to better quantify the costs of continued greenhouse gas emissions for Americans,” Klavans said. “That can only help our region plan for a better future.” https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09368-2 This anthropogenic influence was previously undetected because the current generation of climate models systematically underestimate the amplitude of forced climate variability. A new attribution technique that statistically corrects for this error suggests that observed PDO impacts—including the ongoing multidecadal drought in the western United States—can be largely attributed to human activity through externally forced changes in the PDO. These results indicate that we need to rethink the attribution and projection of multidecadal changes in regional climate.
×
×
  • Create New...