Jump to content

Stebo

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    39,942
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Stebo

  1. The problem too is the band isn't exactly wide so noise level changes are making a huge issue. Like what do you do with DTX's CWA.
  2. Its like the 3km Nam, flatter, which helps both of us.
  3. There is one short range model that I watch because its been very good, the RDPS(RGEM).
  4. So far there haven't been any changes of the 00z models out there, the problem is they were still split.
  5. Both look like they may come in NW Meanwhile the HRRR is definitely in the south camp.
  6. We are as early as 36 hours out and have significant model discrepancies on location for the snow band.
  7. Bit flatter of a track too, and definitely south and east a bit.
  8. See out this way the GFS was the best for the ice storm, and has been the better model as of late, it locked in 4 days in advance and didnt move.
  9. I would be concerned about boundary layer issues for Chicago, the brunt of the snow there would be coming during the day in marginal temps to begin with. If rates can overcome then it should be alright, otherwise there will be issues.
  10. I thought it was here comes the rain again, or was it miss south stank, I forget.
  11. My issue with the ECMWF/EPS/NAM is their tendency to overamplify, I mean I would be shocked if this thing bottomed out at like 975, impossible no, unlikely yes in my opinion. So that strength change will dictate a lot of changes downstream. Not to mention that the ECMWF/EPS had moved south and east for like 5 runs in a row. Its solution is shaky as well.
  12. Of course as soon as I say I like the southern solutions the GFS/GEFS move north, because why the hell not.
  13. When I say consensus I mean more models having that solution, they could very well be all wrong too. I am not saying that as a predetermined outcome... Plus I have made it pretty apparent in previous posts that I don't know what is going to happen but I am leaning more towards the southern solution set.
  14. Bowme has been right here for years under another account.
  15. And this is why I like March snows. They melt within a few days
  16. Euro is still moving southeast to the concensus of the GFS/RDPS/ICON/UKMET. The only stinker is the GDPS which is too warm for appreciable snow until it's east of here. The NAM is way too NW and doesn't even agree with the SREF mean which is much closer to the GFS group. It is still close though for Detroit to get skunked if it shifts a hair north.
  17. Until the Euro budges I won't write anything off.
  18. So the GFS/Nam12/RDPS all are unchanged from 18z but the GFS/RDPS are a snowstorms here and the NAM12 is an ice storm. ICON moved south to match the GFS/RDPS.
  19. Yeah that would probably be a snow/ice/rain scenario here.
  20. The EPS mean if anything ticked a hair south, it did lose some of the bigger dogs too which isn't surprising. Path is still for the low to run from STL/Fort Wayne/Detroit.
  21. I don't know what to make of this one, I think the Euro is overamplified but I don't know if I buy the GFS being this far south. What I will say is that it hasn't moved much compared to the Euro and has the GDPS/RDPS/Ukmet in its corner, where as the Euro has the NAM12 in its corner, to an extent. The NAM12 is actually an ice storm here. The Euro has a straight snow to rain scenario which I completely don't buy at all especially with an occluding storm. Basically TL/DR is an idk emoji.
  22. I would really be surprised if it backed that far west, it would have to essentially go North from AR.
×
×
  • Create New...