Sea-breeze, or marine air, certainly has been a big killer as well, especially with early season events. What's interesting though is with waters running so much warmer than average I wonder if this has become less of a negating factor?
I do remember some posts from you in the earlier years regarding this axis. It makes a ton of sense meteorologically. This would be a super fun research study (I actually wanted to do something like this for senior research, but it was just too in depth and I didn't have the time to do such a study).
Ultimately, we can expect shortwaves to track:
1) North of the border across Quebec, in which the convective/severe potential is more far northern New England.
2) Right along the US/Canadian border, in which convective/severe potential is more northern New England
3) Just south of the border, in which the potential is northern and central New England
4) Right across northern or central New England in which the focus in central and portions of southern New England
But we want these shortwaves to either be de-amplifying or remaining steady state - not de-amplifying like yesterday. If yesterday's shortwave was not de-amplifying we probably would have seen better lapse rates as one product of an amplifying wave is to cool the mlvls.